SpunkySelfTwitter It’s an especially fun movie from a director and cast who are clearly having a good time allowing themselves to let loose.

Rio Hayward All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

Portia Hilton Blistering performances.

Juana what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.

alkaizen This is one of the worse movies i ever seen...Oh god, i cant understand how a movie from 2003 can be much more worse than 80's trash horror movies. This movie is so ridiculous, bad acting, bad dialog, very bad CGI, a lot of non sense things... I like trash horror movie, but i need to warn people, this one is awful, is not even funny, i wish i be able to give 0 to this movie.This movie don't worth your time.*DONT WATCH!*---------------------------------- -----------------------------------------

agent_squirrel Let me just start of by saying that the original Scarecrow may indeed be considered a gem in harsh comparison to this movie. How they managed to get a hold of a semi-well known actor like Tony Todd is beyond me. Basically, this movie manages to lose any magic that the first one had. And believe me, some how making a movie WORSE than the first one is a feat. A great and marvelous feat. For those who have watched the first movie, remember lovable Lester Dwervick? OK well he's dead, but for some reason the same exact scarecrow is in this movie. With the death of Lester also went all those crazy one-liners and kung fu flips. That was the only redeeming factor of the first movie. Now, we come to Slayer which is just a half-assed attempt at trying to blah blah...rocket launcher to the face. God this movie sucks.

boltupright32 Let it be known, that I enjoy bad movies. I really do. I am an actor, and screenwriter, and have many talented film-making friends. A few of us truly enjoy watching bad movies due to their skill in teaching us how not to make bad movies. But I am afraid I must speak candidly about this "Motion Picture" (for lack of a better term). This is the single worst picture that has ever been projectile vomited onto the silver screen. Within the course of my good friend and I watching this film, we were stunned at the sheer "Badness" of the picture. Keep in mind this is not "Bad" as in Michael Jackson's "Bad", but "Bad" as in: maggots eating a delicious decaying corpse would actually stop gorging themselves, stare in unbelief at the television screen and instantly learn the English language just to be able to say "Please someone kill me now". My friend and I actually lost all of our talents & abilities for a short time watching this movie. We were actually so sapped of strength, that we forgot how to make movies, or how to act or how to create anything because the "Black Hole" of all bad movies had risen in our midst and we began to be stretched out into pencil thin rails as we were slowly and systematically obliterated from existence. The only thing that saved us was the shared experience of seeing the pinnacle of bad movies. Even wading through the immense landfill of "Hammer" films we realized that they could never compare to what was happening to us at that moment in time. At the very least Hammer films are entertaining. They at least gave us something to laugh at until we couldn't keep food down. Please do not get me wrong. This movie must be applauded for its sheer Ability to destroy anyone who watches it. They have succeeded in making a film that realistically could kill you in 7 days if you watch it too long. I gave it a rating of 1 only because -1 was not an option that was given to me.

Luciphyre Well, they got Tony Todd (Candyman) to appear in this movie, to bad it wasn't as good as the first Scarecrow. Yeah he runs around Kung-Fuing his way about killing people, but this time the Scarecrow seems more Serious. I guess if you see this before the first one you might think different about it, hard call though; Scarecrow was more laughs, one liners and just straight low budget horror movie. Scarecrow Slayer is less talk more CG killing and a more serious additude. Again like the first "Scarecrow," yep the girls all look good but no nudity, might have helped the first one, but even nudity in this movie wouldn't have gone over at all. The just of it is a fraternity prank gone bad with revenge upon people he knows, even the girl he loves(Since the Spirit came from her ex-boyfriend: cause he was shot by Tony Todd). The only part worth laughing at is their use of Marines. Ha those idiots couldn't have even been marines if god put them there. They try to shoot the Scarecrow with a Rocket Launcher..... Oops it don't work, ya like that would make sense in a movie. Wait the Marines are running away, ya in what world was this. Oh and to top it off they make a electrical sheet by plugging a power cord into a light socket attached to chicken wire on the floor trying to Electrify the Scarecrow, Uh I don't see that happening, even in another low budget movie. To bad...... well they always say "Sequals usually are no good, unless your Jason!"