Afouotos Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

Hayden Kane There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

Verity Robins Great movie. Not sure what people expected but I found it highly entertaining.

Jonah Abbott There's no way I can possibly love it entirely but I just think its ridiculously bad, but enjoyable at the same time.

kosmasp But having watched this as a double bill with "Killer Ants", I have to say this was the better movie. Just for the fact alone they used color filters for their lighting. It's not perfect or anything that people would show in their film school or anywhere they teach. Still there has been an effort on that technical side of it. But being a late 90s movie it is also a TV outing that looks dated in more than one way on your 16:9 TV (because it's shot in 4:3 you see).So the technical side kind of undermines itself, though I guess you can't fault it too much for that. The acting and sound design though is horrible to say the least. And not in a good way. What's really surprising though: this for some reason go treated to a sequel. No I haven't watched that

TheLittleSongbird The first movies from The Asylum and an example of a company that debuts with a terrible movie and carry on making countless others that are even worse. Killers I really do have to agree was a disaster on all levels. Well...maybe not quite all, Kim Little was not too bad, actually she gives a very impassioned performance, though she was much better in the sequel(which while not great was a significant improvement over this). And you can't help shake off that feeling that she was too good-seeming for someone so low. But her performance isn't enough, and that is mainly because the rest of the acting is so bad, more a case though of people trying too hard rather than non-tryers, especially from Paul Logan who makes his clichéd role even more so with a permanent scowl on his face, I wasn't sure whether it was because he was trying too hard to be villainous or whether it was because he didn't want to be there in the first place. A lot of things don't help the actors though, their characters are stereotypical, blandly developed and even annoying(Erica Ortega's character does come out as over-the-top), and the dialogue is vomit-inducingly inane. The story did have an underwritten and over-simplistic scenario to begin with, but does nothing to do something with it. It was too dull, predictable and completely lacking in suspense, and further spoilt by direction lacking in tautness and some of the most irritating camera work(enough with the rapid camera shots already) and lighting schemes of any movie I've encountered. All in all, apart from Kim Little Killers is a disaster. 1/10 Bethany Cox

michaelzap ...but you can see it from here.I definitely don't understand why anyone would recommend this movie. Not a bit of plot, not suspenseful, not well-made. No point to having made it, really.Completely forgettable in ever way.

killers Just rented the flick, and was at the edge of my seat the whole time. Turn the lights off, and the sound up, and you can really get into it. A friend saw it at a few festivals and told me to rent it. I did. I loved it. GO RENT IT!!!