Odelecol
Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.
Jenna Walter
The film may be flawed, but its message is not.
Raymond Sierra
The film may be flawed, but its message is not.
subxerogravity
The original Wild things is a classic. They're not going to ruin that with these non-inventive low budget straight-to-video sequels, it's more embarrassing for the ones involved with it. All the attempts to make it like the first one fall short. The movie has the same twist and turns as the first movie and it's sequel, which is now formulated and makes nothing that happen a surprise.Normally, I would give a point for nudity, but naked boobs is not even enough to make this film appealing.just really crap.
Kris
Some Sundays you just want to stay indoors, sheltered from the poor weather, watching movies and eating popcorn. And mostly you do not really care about the quality of the film you are watching. Unfortunately, having too little to choose from, this does not always end up being the case: I had a bad feeling about this one, and did only see the movie because a friend of mine gave it to me for free (and I wonder why...). This boring and VERY predictable flick contained tons of cartoonish stereotypes, pisspoor acting, lousy editing and a script worse than in most cartoons for kids. Even the wannabe sexy seminude girl-on-girl scenes are so put on that they get you less hot than outdoor swimming during a snowy winter. Be warned, spend your two hours doing something better!
DJGilby
Even though everyone knows this movie doesn't compare to the original movie, it's still a great movie. Personally I think Marie and Elena are good actors even though they could have done better. Let me also say the sex scenes were really hot. This is not deja U all over again like the last person said. It is a completely different movie with a completely different plot. Maybe one or two twists were predictable, but most of them weren't. It was a lot better than Wild Things 2 and I don't know why everyone dislikes this. The girls weren't as hot as the ones in the other movie, but they were still extremely hot. My grade for this movie is a B+ and I really recommend it.
kaiisgod
I think WT3 is a pretty decent movie, much better than the second, but don't expect a clever movie because you'll be disappointed. The plot doesn't differ too much from the first movie, a man accused of raping a young girl plus the difficult relationship with his step-daughter (Sarah Laine) with the diamonds in the middle. The low-class girl is interpreted by Sandra McCoy as Neve Campbell did that role in the first. Both girls are very good-looking, especially Laine. There's treason, blackmail and a well-thought scheme (at least in the minds of the characters). The revealing ending shows with flashbacks during the credits the key points of the plot, a surprising finale that is hard to anticipate. So, if you like WT1 you definitely will enjoy this one. I give WT3 Diamonds in the Rough 6/10.
