Maidexpl Entertaining from beginning to end, it maintains the spirit of the franchise while establishing it's own seal with a fun cast

ThrillMessage There are better movies of two hours length. I loved the actress'performance.

AshUnow This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

Fleur Actress is magnificent and exudes a hypnotic screen presence in this affecting drama.

Brucey D This film was the product of two main thoughts; 1) "Lets make a film about Nazi fifth columnists...." and 2) " hang on, let's make the bad guys ex-Nazis who are now Communists instead..." and so a muddled, overly expensive film is born. It would have been bad enough if the second thought had been shortly after the first, but it wasn't; the film had to be re-shot in part, and it shows.This film isn't entirely without merit, but for me the story just doesn't make sense; leave alone the usual business where the bad guys insist on explaining their dark deeds in detail whilst not disposing of the good guys, or taking the opportunity to push the button etc (as seen in countless films ranging from 'The thirty-nine steps' to various Bond outings); here we are expected to believe that one of the main bad guys has comparatively recently been the subject of an exposé in a national magazine, but, er, this didn't immediately alert the bad guys when the writer turns up. Even though they knew all about it.Oh, and while we're at it, you might notice that the good guy gets hit on the head twice, but in exactly the same place each time. What are the chances of that...? Quite high if you are trying to cobble a film together without having to reshoot the whole thing, as it turns out....Just about worth watching if you have an interest in films of this type.

drjgardner This is a fairly ordinary anti-communist film from the early 50s, slightly below the standard of other films from this period like Pickup on South Street (1953), Kiss Me Deadly (1955), I Married a Communist (1950), and My Son John (1952). It falls way short of allegorical anti-communist films such as High Noon (1952) and The Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956), although there are some who will argue that those films are not anti-communist but rather anti-American.In a nutshell, a vacationing magazine reporter stumbles (Elliott Reid) on a plot to destroy America with biological weapons. The devious plot is devised by former Nazi and current Communist Otto Waldis, who is assisted by Raymond Burr.William Cameron Menzies directs, but don't expect to see the marvelous work he did in such films as "The Black Book", "GWTW", "The Thief of Bagdad" and "Duel in the Sun".

LeonLouisRicci This is One Odd Movie. Starting with the Title that is Meaningless Unless One Knows About a "Riding" Term Meaning the Upper Hand or Some Such Thing, Suffice to Say it is Meaningless. Add to That the Story was Changed Midstream from Nazis to Communist at the Insistence of Howard Hughes.Still, Director Menzies Manages to Make the Thing Look Good, Despite Some Bad Acting that He Left Unattended. The Film Still Manages to Bring the Paranoia of the Time Front and Center with Bizarre Scenes and a Foreboding Atmosphere.It Really Kicks In with the Third Act that Includes Mad Lab Scenes, Female Bondage, Zombie Like People Used as Guinea Pigs, and Some Communist Nut-Case Speeches. This is One of Quirkiest Entries in the Anti-Communist Movies Made During the McCarthy Era and that is Saying Something because Most of Them were Really Quirky.The Commie Characters All Look Like Something Out of a Comic Book with Exaggerated Features and Props. They're One Scary Looking Bunch. The Protagonist and His Love Interest are So Sanitized and "Normal" Looking They Seem to have Stepped Out of a Disney Movie. The Contrast is Quite Startling and Add to the Surreal Nature of the Movie When Watched Today.

jim riecken (youroldpaljim) I was 12 years old when I first learned of this film from reading John Baxters chapter on William Cameron Menzies in his ground breaking book "Science Fiction in The Cinema.' The plot concerning germ warfare and Baxters praise of the film made me want to see it. I later learned from other sources that this film was made from a finished film called THE MAN HE FOUND, about Adolph Hitler being alive and well and living the USA. RKO studio heads did not like the film and ordered a new story written and new footage shot that would use as much footage from THE MAN HE FOUND as possible. This made me want to see it even more. But for years this film eluded me. It never showed up on TV, never shown as part of a Menzies retrospective and never turned up officially on video. It then turned up in the early 1990's late one night on TNT, where I taped it and have watched several times since. While I found the film of some interest, I can certainly say Baxter over praised this film. Its not a bad cold war era espionage thriller, but other than the plot, its nothing special either. It is no doubt the least interesting of Menzies fantastic films that he both designed and directed. The court yard where infected guinea pigs wander around like zombies and Otto Waldis's lab are of some visual interest, but over all there isn't much of Menzies design genius evident. To comment on his direction is pointless, because Menzies was never a good director of actors. The reshooting and incorporating old scenes with the new scenes is done fairly well. I noticed where new scenes were inserted, but only because I was looking for them. Note that this film uses a lot of close ups. Otto Waldis as the former Nazi scientist, now working for Russian Communists is a bit hard to take. He praises his new adopted ideology. While its true Nazism and Communism have more in common then with western style democracy, most of the Nazi scientists who went to work for the Commies after the war did so more out of pragmatic and mercenary reasons than ideological ones.