Lumsdal Good , But It Is Overrated By Some

Portia Hilton Blistering performances.

Blake Rivera If you like to be scared, if you like to laugh, and if you like to learn a thing or two at the movies, this absolutely cannot be missed.

Raymond Sierra The film may be flawed, but its message is not.

dbdumonteil In the magnificent verdant landscapes of old England ,a young girl and her sister stifle in a puritan sexually-repressed atmosphere;the father,a minister ,is surrounded by a family living in the past -particularly the grandma- ,the mother left the house a long time ago and the relatives tell them their branch of the family is degenerate ;the meal ,when the girls come back from France ,is subject to holy writ quotations (the prodigal "daughters " and the fat calf),and when the eldest tells her dad she needs an occupation,he suggest she give Sunday school lessons.This milieu is rotten to the core ,the heroine seems to live in a gilded cage .Leo ,the local bourgeois lad ,enjoys looking at the others when they work(the dam is a transparent metaphor which will be smartly used for the conclusion) .Even the "modern " couple" is not that liberal,particularly the woman who is horrified when the girl tells her she is in love with a gypsy:sexual liberation,OK ,but stick with your own kind! When th gypsy opens the car door and let the maid out ,he opens the floodgates :freom this moment on,the good girl will rebel against her milieu:the show,which includes risqué jokes and French can -can(not shown),the slap in Leo's face ,the visit to those "persons" who live like animals , the swimming in the nude ;in fact the gypsy's presence is not long on the screen ,he has no name ,he is the en-lightener : a crude uneducated man is the only person who has understood the girl's lack of love and tenderness.The bursting of the dam may be simplistic symbolism:it destroys the house,drowns the grandmother who represents a past ,a puritan past ,and allows the two lovers to sleep together in the girl's own bed! The last picture ,a car running across the smoking ruins makes sense,although the divorced woman might be a bourgeois rebel ,almost an oxymoron.In its muffled atmosphere,"the virgin and the gypsy " is really a sleeper which should be rediscovered.Like this?try these....-Lady Chatterley's lover (same writer,several versions) -the go-between (Losey) -Tess (Polanski) -Maurice (Ivory)

bob_bear Obviously made to cash in on "Women In Love" but lacking in the former's brooding atmosphere or rampant sensuality, The Virgin & The Gypsy promises much but fails to deliver.The racy (for its time) title and the full-on nudity of its predecessor must have brought out the dirty mac brigade in droves when it was released. If so, they were to be sorely disappointed. Here we find Franco "Sex On Legs" Nero paired with an unremarkable lead actress of charisma-bypass proportions. No chemistry between them. None.The editing seems to be remarkably clumsy and I've yet to see a print that has been remastered which all adds to the the impression of a moth-eaten also-ran. The pace is slow. The production values are cheap. It's just not very good.

stolenalice Christopher Miles' take on DH Lawrence is perhaps more delicate in its execution than Ken Russell's Women in Love, but no less appealing to watch. He strongly evokes the period of Lawrence's novella and the stifling home atmosphere that the heroine, Yvette, returns to. In that role, Joanna Shimkus displays beauty, spirit and conflicting emotions in equal measure, kicking against the straight-laced boundaries of her family and trying to come to terms with a dark secret at its heart, when no-one else will.Into her life comes Franco Nero's saturnine gypsy, who has an immediate and increasing effect on the young woman. Having recently seen him as the pure of heart, but initially pompous Sir Lancelot in Camelot, his performance here is more akin to that seen in Django - a man of very few words, inclined more to action to express himself. It's not hard to see why Yvette is attracted to him - not only strikingly handsome, but also the absolute opposite of the young men she knows in the village, who all seem pervaded with post-WW1 uncertainty. There are plenty of sensual moments and a strong feeling of the desire he has created in her, as much to escape the familial bonds as anything else.The denouement of the film almost seems a little rushed in the end, but perhaps this is down to its faithfulness to the original book which is just 10 chapters long. Worth a viewing if you enjoy other Lawrence adaptations, period tales or romantic dramas.

petergolson Browsing through and cataloguing my tapes just now (I genuinely had nothing better to do) I found this film 'The Virgin and the Gypsy', which I must have taped off channel 5 some time back for the sole purpose of forwarding through to the saucy bits, weapon at the ready and perched alertly over the remote.Now that I'm too old for such shenanigans (and not living at home has taken away the 'someone-could-walk-in-at-any-minute' edge), I thought I'd actually watch the film.To summarise, it's not that great, not that bad, some nice photography, I just found out the main bird is Mrs Sidney Poitier, she is very good looking in it, but provides very little amusement for adolescent armchair residents, especially in these days of the internet (where nothing less than a horse-midget combo will do). And I reckon the guy (the 'Gypsy' of the title) inspired Kevin Rowland's Dexy's 'look'.