Jeanskynebu the audience applauded

BootDigest Such a frustrating disappointment

FeistyUpper If you don't like this, we can't be friends.

Hayden Kane There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

bbmtwist An interesting futuristic film on the premise of building a tunnel under the Atlantic ocean to link Britian and the USA. Richard Dix is his usual stalwart presence as McAllan, an engineer who has in this scenario already created a tunnel under the English Channel, uniting France and England as of 1940, five years in the future from when the film was released.There are the usual disasters, delays and money problems. The crux of the film though rises from the tragic flaw of hubris (pride), which causes tragedy within the family of McAllan due to his dogged determination to put his job/his vision above all else.A slight problem results from casting both leading women (Madge Evans and Helen Vinson) since they resemble each other so closely, one has trouble following who is on screen. The best moment is the meeting of the two late in the film and the touching and illuminating scene that results.Leslie Banks is excellent as the best friend. Henry Oscar is a marvelous villain, self-assured and wickedly serene. Arliss and Huston have two back to back scenes, beginning at 43 minutes in and one hour and fifteen minutes in. They are quite short and constitute cameos.The real star here is the art direction of the tunnel itself.It is kept vague as to exactly how the USA and the UK are going to benefit from this tunnel, however. Seems more problematic than somewhat as opposed to sea or air travel.It's quite gripping and quite enjoyable. Recommended.

utgard14 Fascinating story, set in the near future (for the 1930s), about a joint American-British project to build an undersea tunnel from London to New York. The tunnel is the brainchild of engineer Richard Dix, who leads the work on building it. The project takes years and costs him dearly in the end. I'm a huge classic movie buff but I had never even heard of this wonderful gem until today. It combines futuristic sci-fi technology with downbeat realism about how such a project could actually be accomplished and what it would cost, in terms of money and lives. The sets are absolutely jaw-dropping. This is 1935, people, and it wasn't even made with a huge Hollywood budget. Wait until you see the effort put into making this work. The sets, the gadgets, the special effects are all very impressive. No CGI here. This is a prime example of how good old-school could be. While this is all very cool, the movie does have more going for it than just looking great. The cast is solid, with iron-jawed Richard Dix taking the lead. Dix could be a wooden actor at times but here I thought he was very good. Beautiful Madge Evans is likable as his noble wife. Leslie Banks plays his best friend. Ladies, Leslie Banks has a shower scene. You're welcome. Good support from C. Aubrey Smith, Basil Sydney, and Helen Vinson. The characters in this film may be prone to melodramatics at times but I felt none of them were completely clichéd. I was surprised more than once by their actions. Also, nice guest appearances from Walter Huston and George Arliss, as the American President and British Prime Minister respectively. The soap opera elements seem to factor into most of the complaints I've read. I really didn't think this part of the film was that bad, especially for this period when playing to the rafters was expected. Your tolerance on this may vary, however. The work on the tunnel, which comprises most of the runtime, is gripping stuff. This is one film that should appeal to a variety of movie fans. I definitely recommend you seek it out. Oh, and dig that awesome movie poster.

Neil Doyle There's an art deco look to the streamlined images of many scenes from THE TUNNEL, giving it the futuristic look it needs to succeed as science fiction. There are even TV screens and/or videophones being used in 1935 for conversations between RICHARD DIX and his wife, MADGE EVANS, both of whom have to spend too much time on the domestic drama behind the main story of the tunnel.Their unhappy marriage comes into play when he becomes heavily involved in construction of an Atlantic tunnel connecting the British mainland to the U.S.A. "His real self stays behind in the tunnel," she tells LESLIE BANKS, her husband's co-worker. Later, their grown son becomes a worker in the tunnel but is tragically killed during a volcanic burst of lava that forces a section of the tunnel to be sealed off by emergency doors so that many other lives can be spared.There is much talk about the "depth of the Atlantic" and "the character of the sea bed", and references to "new steel and radium drills" that are supposed to make the concept of a transatlantic tunnel possible. And to the credit of the filmmakers, they do make such an undertaking look realistically possible, at least for the duration of the story.C. AUBREY SMITH lends his sober presence to a good supporting role but the film is largely concerned with the domestic troubles of Dix and his wife. MADGE EVANS looks so much like Norma Shearer in the glossy close-ups she gets and was clearly one of the most classically beautiful of the '30s film actresses.But when the action is centered on the tunnel, the film remains fascinating to watch, beautifully photographed in B&W. Unfortunately, RICHARD DIX is given to overacting at every opportunity, particularly during the melodramatic situations involving his marriage.Summing up: Melodramatic, but in many ways, ahead of its time in true sci-fi style. WALTER HUSTON as an American president and GEORGE ARLISS as a British Prime Minister have cameo roles.

bkoganbing It's always interesting to see science fiction from the past and see what the conception of the world is from years past. How close are we to realizing a tunnel across one of earth's oceans?In 1994 the English Channel Tunnel commenced operations and at that it is only the second largest tunnel on the planet. The Seikan Tunnel which connects the Japanese islands of Hokkaido and Honshu is the largest. At that the Swiss will have beaten both of these when the Gotthard tunnel is finished which will be under several Alps speeding transportation across Switzerland and Europe in general.Politics as well nature delayed the construction of the English Channel Tunnel. So when and if we're ever ready to cross the Atlantic Ocean, by that time we may be rocketing to different worlds.In the world that The Tunnel is set in the construction of this undersea passage will forever cement the home world of the British Empire to the United States of America. At that point the English speaking people's of the planet will take on anybody. At least President Walter Huston of the USA and future Prime Minister George Arliss hope that the powers will be joined at the hip forever so to speak.The reason this is all possible is a radium drill that scientist Leslie Banks has invented. The Colonel Goethals of the project is hard driving American Richard Dix. Dix sacrifices all for the project including family because he believes in it so. The women in both their lives at different points are Madge Evans and Helen Vinson.The sheer idea of the technological achievement dwarfs the story and the players. The special effects are primitive by today's standards, still the film does entertain. When we get into the personal lives of those involved, the film veers over into the melodramatic.Some thirty years after this film there was this Grade C science fiction film that involved a trans Pacific tunnel. But that was being worked on in secret by the Communist Chinese to invade the United States. That epic was called Battle Beneath the Earth and it is the worst nightmare of every demagogic politician who worked up the crowds concerning the yellow peril.I guess the moral of both stories is when Occidentals build it, it's a good thing, when Orientals do it it's bad.