ThedevilChoose When a movie has you begging for it to end not even half way through it's pure crap. We've all seen this movie and this characters millions of times, nothing new in it. Don't waste your time.

InformationRap This is one of the few movies I've ever seen where the whole audience broke into spontaneous, loud applause a third of the way in.

Siflutter It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.

Billy Ollie Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable

politidomenic I am a product of the LOWER HUDSON VALLEY, not that far from NYC, but I had never heard of HOOTON(on the Hudson), just plain Hooton, or Hooton, NY, until this movie. Looking for peace at the ripe old age of 64, could anyone help me to find Hooton, thus far I think it is on the west side of the river, but...? If all else fails, Ms. Day is fortunately still with us, just a few years older, if ANYONE can get into contact, please ask her for directions, or that she get into contact, or at the least send my an email address, so that we can straigten this situation out, and I can finally come to a peaceful ending...

Ecology Fan This film adapts a Jean Kerr novel about her life with a professor-turned-theater-critic. Apparently, the novel is hilarious, but this film is anything but. Even the trailer -- which for a comedy should really capture the best laugh lines -- elicited barely a chuckle. Or maybe audiences then were less sophisticated: who knows? Anyway, the best diagnosis of this film is that David Niven is horribly miscast. Doris Day is her usual charming self, if not a bit anodyne (no surprise there, sorry!), but there is just nothing by way of chemistry between David Niven and her that would make you think that this is anything but an attempt to cash in on two brand-name actors. Niven's character alternates between flying off the handle and almost robotically delivering lines better suited for some boringly handsome American actor than for an actor of Niven's caliber.Moreover, when the story line takes the characters to the fictional Hudson River exurb of Hooton (which sounds more like somewhere in Appalachia or the Mayberry South than anything in that part of the world), the pastiche of crazy local townspeople is almost too much to bear.That it goes on for just under two hours adds insult to injury.

TheLittleSongbird 'Please Don't Eat the Daisies' is another Doris Day film that was seen recently as a quest to see all of her films not yet seen. After seeing it, 'Please Don't Eat the Daisies' is worth seeing, it is not quite as fresh as a daisy but sticking with it and seeing it grow is worth it.Day has certainly done much better films, as has David Niven and Charles Walters, but Day has also done worse. 'Please Don't Eat the Daisies' at its best is delightful and doesn't try to do any more than necessary and be more than it is. Its reputation seems to be mixed to lukewarm, count me in as those who thinks it deserves better. It is certainly not without its faults.Like in 'It Happened to Jane', and almost as badly, the children are badly cast, try far too hard to be cute and end up being so sugary cutesy it'll give one toothache and are at their worst rather obnoxious. The film does drag a little towards the end, as a result of trying to do a little too much, and a couple of scenes at this point are not placed as comfortably as they could have been.Likewise with the otherwise pleasant songs, the title song coming off best. Once again Day sounds beautiful, musically and in an interpretative sense she's spot on and there is a lot of sincerity in her singing.Day is a sheer delight in 'Please Don't Eat the Daisies' too. She is perky and charming with a naturally sparkling presence and deft comic timing. David Niven is debonair and urbane and the two gel so well and dazzle together. Niven is particularly good with Janis Paige however, which boast some hilarious moments. Great support from lively Janis Paige, ever scene-stealing Spring Byington and suitably stuffy Richard Haydn.Charles Walters seems comfortable with the material, and handles it and the cast well and mostly handles the various subplots adeptly. There is a lot going on here with five subplots, the story could easily have been bloated but manages not to be and it's all done in a way that's fun and relatable.Much of 'Please Don't Eat the Daisies' has a fast, snappy pace, only being bogged down towards the end. The script is easy to relate to, very funny in a light way and has a surprisingly sophisticated edge.Visually it's all very colourful and stylish with exemplary use of CinemaScope, while the music has energy and nuance.In conclusion, not perfect but a nice film that passes the time inoffensively, and is more than a just for completests film. 7/10 Bethany Cox

SimonJack One who watches this movie simply for the comedy would be hard-pressed to rate it more than six stars. Viewing it only as a story about a family may earn it six or seven stars. Then there's a story about career and family conflict, about love, and what's most important. And, how about a standard theme of a man who works late or away from home and is enticed toward infidelity? What about the drama of a major change in one's profession and how it affects a person and one's spouse? Then there is the move from the city to the country, and associated major changes in lifestyle.A number of reviews have doted on that last point, seeing this film as a leftover from other films such as "George Washington Slept Here" of 1942, or "Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House" of 1948. But the whole plot of those films revolves around the move from the city to the country and renovating a condemned property. If that's all I saw in this film, I would rate it no better than 4 or 5 stars. Because it doesn't have the humor of those two true comedies.But, "Please Don't Eat the Daisies" is much more than a simple plot film. It's really four or five or more plots neatly interwoven. 1st plot – Laurence Mackay (played by David Niven) moves from teaching theater at a major college (Columbia University?), to writing a book and becoming the latest Broadway critic for a major New York newspaper. 2nd plot – His loving and devoted wife Kate (played by Doris Day) manages four young boys in their Manhattan apartment with the help of a maid. She rushes to join her husband for the opening of a musical play being staged by a long-time friend and godfather to their children – Alfred North (played by Richard Haydn). Laurence struggles over his review with Kate. Finally, he has to tell the truth. He pans the play.3rd plot – North is furious about the review and vows to get even; and the star of the play, Deborah Vaughn (played by Janis Paige) joins his vendetta to get even with Laurence. 4th plot – The family moves from the city to the country, with all that entails – and it's a lot. 5th plot – Kate sees changes in Laurence as he has his new position of power. He's now more self-righteous and self-centered. He's unkind, even mean. He doesn't see it at first, naturally. More subplots fit in here – the community is going to put on a play and Kate is part of it. Deborah makes a play for Laurence, and although he is in unconformable situations with her, he remains faithful to Kate.Now, if one watches this movie from this standpoint, it is much more interesting and enjoyable. It's a movie about a major job change for the main breadwinner. It's a movie about a change in personality. It's a film about a feud with one's closest friend. It's a film about moving from the city to the country and upending of lifestyle. It's a film about raising four small boys and all that goes with that. It's about a couple who are madly in love with one another and who struggle with all of these things. And with this, there are sprinklings of humor here and there. Now it's a different movie, much more interesting, and even fun in places.Now it earns 7 to 8 stars – and I go for the 8 for two reasons. First, it has a fine cast all of whom give very good performances. Second, it's based on a best-selling 1957 book of essays by Jean Kerr with the same title. It's autobiographical, and the people and situations were real. Kerr was an author, playwright and songwriter. She wrote two books, several plays and stage scores and scripts for several musicals. Her husband was Walter Kerr, a writer, lyricist and director of several plays. So, his character in real life succeeded on the stage where Niven's character in the movie doesn't succeed. And, in real life, Walter Kerr was theater critic for the New York Herald Tribune from 1951-1966, and for The New York Times from 1966-1983.To top it all off, the couple collaborated on several musicals and they won two Tony awards for "Golidlocks" in 1958. In 1978, Walter won a Pulitzer Prize for criticism. The couple was married for 56 years and they had six children. Walter died in 1996 at age 83, and Jean died in 2003 at age 80. References about the couple state that Laurence Mackay in this movie is based on Walter Kerr. All of this would seem to lend credence to this film as being based on real people and events, with many interwoven plots.And, here's a closing punch that some may find interesting. It's a true example of how Walter Kerr could be a harsh critic if the play was bad in his eyes. It's from early in his career as a critic. The original musical of "Candide" opened on Broadway Dec. 1, 1956. It was directed by Tyrone Guthrie. In his New York Herald Tribune critique of the musical on Dec. 3, 1956, Kerr wrote, "Three of the most talented people our theater possesses – Lillian Hellman, Leonard Bernstein, Tyrone Guthrie – have joined hands to transform Voltaire's Candide into a really spectacular disaster. Who is mostly responsible for the great ghostly wreck that sails like a Flying Dutchman across the fogbound stage of the Martin Beck? That would be hard to say, the honors are so evenly distributed." The musical was a box office disaster. It had just 73 performances and closed after two months.