Steineded How sad is this?

Livestonth I am only giving this movie a 1 for the great cast, though I can't imagine what any of them were thinking. This movie was horrible

Gurlyndrobb While it doesn't offer any answers, it both thrills and makes you think.

Brenda The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

Eddie Cantillo Fright Night 2: New Blood(2013) Starring: Will Payne, Sean Power, Sacha Parkinson, Chris Waller, Jaime Murray, John-Christian Bateman, Liana Margineanu, Alina Minzu, Adi Hostiuc, Joelle Coutinho, Ada Gales, Constantin Barbulescu, G Catalin Banghea, Calin Andrei Razvan, Marius Chivu, Roxana Girleanu, Nicholas Lupu, Deliu Ionut, Andreea Mihalascu, Ana Maria Saragia, Costinel Lenghel, Banica Gheorghe, Banica Gheorghe,Mihai Verbintschi, Carmen Popa, Anastasia Pirogova, Dalila Poch, Ian Fisher Directed By: Eduardo Rodríguez Review NEW BLOOD Hello Kiddies your pal the Crypt-Critic is here with some rotten blood. I mean wow was this stupid and totally unnecessary. The Fright Night franchise started in 1985 with the cult-classic from Tom Holland, got a sequel. Years later the same thing happens remake style, we get a great remake of the original Fright Night with Collin Farrel and then this shitty sequel. This sequel has the exact same plot, beat by beat. If you've seen the original, the remake with Collin Farell then you basically have seen this movie. The only minor differences I can point out are is there is a school about I believe it's Romanian history and they talk about vampires and they say Dracula is a woman. Which the main vampire who is after Charlie and Amy is a woman, there professor. Peter Vincet goes to a strip club and doesn't get his show cancelled. Last difference which is actually a positive about the film it has a cool fight between Evil Ed and Charlie. You couldn't find a reason this film was mad even if there was a book about it. It accomplishes nothing and is a disgrace to vampires for not being scary and for just sucking, I have seen vampire films that people say are awful but I like to those people watch this then come talk to me. The acting if you can even call it that is one dimensional and lackluster because we've already seen two great films with these characters, I mean I give the actors credit for trying but trying doesn't give you a lot of brownie points in an awful movie. Fright Night 2: New Blood has the worst acting, no originality, spits on one of the most vilest villains in cinema history by making him a woman and is just downright awful, I hated this movie.

chris-cody This film does seem to pass over the 2011 Fright Night remake. It borrows many elements from the original Fright Night and its sequel. However, this does not make a film entirely devoid of entertainment. If you have not seen any previous versions of Fright Night then there may even be some surprises. If you have then it is quite enjoying ticking off the various 'nods' towards the previous movies. I felt the characters of Charley, Amy and 'Evil' seemed to be based more on their 80's versions than their 2011 incarnations. I also particularly enjoyed the teasing cat-and-mouse game employed by Gerri Dandridge upon Charley. Though I was slightly confused as to why he seemed to be specifically chosen for this.Overall, a fun little vampire flick that should divert your attentions away from the boredom of an average evening.Possible spoiler and pedantic point: Wasn't Elizabeth Bathory Hungarian not Romanian? Was this supposed to be explained by the mixing with the Dracula myth?

Shopaholic35 I wanna cry so bad. Fright Night with Colin Farrell was hilariously good but Fright Night 2 was terrible. I completely knew that it was a new cast and probably wouldn't have much to do with the first one but I was still hoping for better. The acting was D-List and not directed well. Probably the one thing I did like was the idea behind the lead female vampire and who she was. Congratulations on thinking slightly out of the box.Overall this movie was a bitter disappointment with very few frightful moments. It was lacking in suspense and you ended up not caring if the cast lived or died. They were all kind of awkward and their behaviour at times was bordering on inappropriate. Do yourself a favour and give this one a miss.

Peter Pluymers Again another vampire movie ....I really didn't like the remake in 2011 of the original cult film from 1985. And this sequel is also for me just a lame excuse to bring in money, feeding on the cult sounding movie title. There is absolutely nothing innovative or original in this film. It's just another story about vampires with all the familiar clichés. Just like its predecessor, the SE's are standard and nothing spectacular. Besides one thing that I have never seen in such movies : the production of sonar-like waves to locate the two students in the dark tunnels. That was an original contribution.The functional nudity and eroticism was taken to a higher level than in the movie from 2011. Murray as the biting vampire herself is one to bite and nibble on. Enormously tasteful to watch. But her delicious nudity isn't shown explicitly. What a pity. However, I think that this strategic move is a way to cover up the lack of talent.This movie isn't a complete disaster and ultimately the whole movie industry is only interested in one thing, and that's money. So I have no problem with the fact that there is a weak decoction made with a huge low budget, in order to hit the market with this product for the fans of such movies. Haven't you seen a Fright Night episode before, good advice, skip this one and watch the original.More reviews at http://opinion-as-a-moviefreak.blogspot.be/