Stevecorp Don't listen to the negative reviews

BoardChiri Bad Acting and worse Bad Screenplay

Merolliv I really wanted to like this movie. I feel terribly cynical trashing it, and that's why I'm giving it a middling 5. Actually, I'm giving it a 5 because there were some superb performances.

Voxitype Good films always raise compelling questions, whether the format is fiction or documentary fact.

kapelusznik18 ***SPOILERS*** Typical WWII Hollywood propaganda flick that makes the enemy Germans occupiers of the just defeated French nation-It was France that declared war on Germany not the other way around-look far better then the members of the French underground movement that's fighting them. We see the Frenchmen and women living in this little French town not at all abused by the German troops as long as they don't try to attack kill and sabotage them. In here we have former French POW Jean Blanchard played by, Dutch actor Philip Dorn, released from a German prison camp because he, suffering from acute tuberculosis, doesn't have long to live. Not wanting to get involved with the French underground movement Jean slowly joins it when he feels that it will exonerate him for being in the view of many fellow Frenchmen, because of his pacifist ideas, a coward and traitor to his country.It's also Jean's wife Yvonne, Brenda Marshall, who gets him to see the light but not for the reasons that you would think. That in trying to win her over since she's involved with Dr. Andre Marbel, George Sanders, not romantically like Jean suspects but in that Dr. Marbel is a major leader in the French Underground movement by running an anti-German underground newspaper! There's also the hot headed young but a bit overconfident French teenager Georges Benoit played by Raymond Roe who despite his prominent role in the movie is not even mentioned in the films credits! It's Georges who acts and looks so American instead of French that he both looks and acts like he just stepped out of an "Andy Hardy" movie. Trying to join up with the French underground Georges and those yo-yo's with him screw themselves up even before they get a chance to shoot off their guns getting caught red-handed by the German gestapo and later executed for their failed efforts.***SPOILERS*** It was in fact Yvonne who came out blasting by gunning down from her hospital window Nazi Colonel Pirosh,Robert Lewis, who order and did it himself young Georges to be executed! even though the person who shot Pirosh was right in front of them the deft and blind German Gestapo had no idea who his attacker was, the dirty rat did in fact survive, and thus ordered 50 innocent Frenchmen to be executed in retaliation. With the just recovered Col. Pirosh, who claimed that his death would be a great loss to humanity, going back on his word in not having them shot if he in fact survived and still ordering the French hostages to be gunned down our hero Jean who despite looking as strong as an ox decided to take the rap in him shooting Pirosh to save Yvonne, Who was ready to turn herself in, from being executed! P.S I didn't quite see Jean's act as that heroic, as Dr. Marbel broadcast on the underground radio, since he knew he didn't have long to live anyway and in his suffering from a deadly and incurable disease by him being executed by the Gestapo would have only put him out of his misery -as well as the movie-anyway!

Martha Wilcox George Sanders plays a French doctor without a French accent. He plays Germans well and even speaks in a German accent, but he can't play a French doctor without sounding quintessentially English.The young brother of the French protagonist, Jean, is quite bold and brave standing up for what he believes and speaking out against oppression. To be honest it;s the French characters that make this film work. Sanders merely lends his name to sell the film, but he contributes very little in terms of his performance.I would advise Sanders fans to stay away from this film as it comes nowhere near the quality of 'Manhunt' or 'Tales of Manhattan'.

richard-1787 This movie has a lot of weaknesses, but its heart is in the right place, and there are definitely good moments for those who enjoy this sort of movie.The only other reviewer of this movie here on IMDb mentioned "Mrs. Miniver," and the comparison is very valid. That very stirring if often melodramatic movie was made to convince Americans in the early 1940s, still given to isolationism, that the English were worth helping because they were good, decent, and courageous people."Paris After Dark" is very similar in that it was made to convince Americans that France, too, merited our help. The situation was very different, however, so the convincing had to be different.France had declared an armistice shortly after being overrun by the Nazi war machine in 1940. Maréchal Pétain, head of the French armed forces, convinced the government to do so, and then collaborated with the Nazis for the rest of the war, for which he was tried after it. As a result, many Americans saw the French as cowardly and lacking in the sort of moral fiber that "Mrs. Miniver" spends all its time demonstrating to be the very essence of the English character.So "Paris After Dark" spends a lot of time arguing that 1) the average Frenchman and -woman, Joe/Jane France, was really courageous, and had had nothing to do with signing the armistice, and 2) that all of France, all classes and both sexes, were already fighting the Nazis through the Resistance, even at the risk of their own lives - thereby showing their courage, moral fiber, etc.This produces a lot of stirring speeches by various of the characters, which, admittedly, often come off as unnaturally oratorical. But you can see what the scriptwriters and the director were trying to achieve.The acting is uneven. George Sanders and Philip Dorn are both very good. Both are men who have to be won over to the Resistance efforts, and their conversions are convincing. Brenda Marshall, the female lead, sometimes overacts, and is not at their level. Marcel Dalio, so good in so many movies, doesn't do a convincing job with the traitor barber.If you've seen American movies made in the 1930s that are set in France, you know that Hollywood had often presented the French as rather foolish. Here it does an admirable job of presenting a wide spectrum of French folk, among them lots of average but very noble individuals.Yes, it's preachy at times. But the cause justified that.If Hollywood's contributions to the war effort interest you, you will find much of interest here.-------------------A note after a second viewing: This movie, released in 1943 before we had landed on the Normandy beaches, deals with France at what was a real turning point in the Occupation.On the one hand, the collaborationist prime minister, Pierre Laval, had just negotiated an exchange of workers to be sent to Germany - the STO, Service du Travail obligatoire - in exchange for French prisoners to be released home to France. (The Germans were holding 1.9 million French soldiers prisoner as part of the Armistice Pétain signed in June, 1940.) The ratio was 3:1, three Frenchmen - or women - sent to Germany to work in exchange for one French soldier to be released. It created further hatred for Germany, as the occupying forces began enforcing the "obligation" for men to leave. Many faced with such deportation joined the French Résistance, as Georges and his three friends try to do in this movie.On the other hand, American forces landed in French North Africa - Morocco and Algeria - at the end of 1942, and after a rather swift campaign, defeated the Germans and Italians there. (If you've ever seen "The Desert Fox", you know that story.) It was called Operation Torch, and, as we see near the end of this movie, it gave the French their first real shot of hope that the Allies had not abandoned them and would, someday, free France as well.As I wrote above, a lot of this movie is oratorical. People give speeches, sometimes even to the camera. But the last part, where Jean is won over to the cause of the Resistance, is really very moving.

Danryd80 Set in German-occupied Paris, the plot concerns the day-to-day struggles of the French resistance during WWII, made all the more believable by a cast chosen from among real-life refugees – in other words those who were eye-witnesses to the film's historical backdrop. I suspect that when "Paris After Dark" played in small-town America, the world it unveiled was still rather exotic. Even with full-on U.S involvement after Pearl Harbor, the idea of an underground resistance for most Americans was something shadowy and obscure. New York Times reviewer Bosley Crowther, though not at all impressed, did acknowledge "the terrible tragedy of the French people under Nazi occupation" which the film evoked. However, this is a film that holds its own alongside similar portrayals of the war in Europe, such as Robert Stevenson's "Joan of Paris" and William Wyler's "Mrs. Miniver", the latter in which the inimitable Greer Garson and Walter Pidgeon bolstered the moral imperative of continued U.S. involvement.Fans of "Casablanca" (1942) will recognize the lovely Madeleine LeBeau in a supporting role. According to Wikipedia, LeBeau, along with her husband, Marcel Dalio, escaped from Paris in June, 1940, just ahead of the Nazi advance, eventually finding their way to the U.S. Fans of George Sanders will love his role as a heroic leader of the underground movement. But the stars of the film are Brenda Marshall and Philip Dorn. Some viewers may recall Marshall as the scientist Nora Goodrich in Anthony Mann's "Strange Impersonation" (1946). The Dutch-born Dorn was better known as an actor in Germany but who also moved to the U.S. with the war's outbreak. Director Leonide Moguy sought refuge in the States in a similar manner. He also directed the interesting noir, "Whistle Stop" (1946), with George Raft and Ava Gardner before returning to France. In short, this was a cast and company that appeared to know first-hand what they were portraying during one of the war's bleakest periods.As of this writing, it is available as a Fox Cinema Archives release, and well worth tracking down, if only for the history lesson it movingly portrays.