Lovesusti
The Worst Film Ever
BallWubba
Wow! What a bizarre film! Unfortunately the few funny moments there were were quite overshadowed by it's completely weird and random vibe throughout.
WillSushyMedia
This movie was so-so. It had it's moments, but wasn't the greatest.
jyuktirat
To be honest I didn't even know this movie was based off of a game. But I enjoyed it. It has good action scenes and to me the ideas for how the characters see things I found innovative and pretty cool. Good cast. Good acting. Caught stuff the second time I watched it which made the story make more sense. Its like any movie translating from a book. There are changes, but unlike video games, books are much more indept with the details. I feel like video game movies get more freedom because it doesn't have as much development.
Joshreynolds-47
Pros: I stopped watching after 20 minutes so I didn't waste too much of my life.Cons: 47 not bald Absolutely no silence whatsoever. Explosions, explosions everywhere. Stupidly boring acting from whoever is playing 47.And the main thing that really bugged me from minute one of that awful monologue, they didn't even get the name of the cloning scientist right. It was Dr Ort-Meyer. Not whoever in the blue hell this "Litvinenko" chap is.Honestly I would have settled for them using ANY of the Five Fathers to be the "creator" or "monetary backer" for the cloning program, but no, instead they made it up.
maaariia
One week after I saw this movie I couldn't recall one single thing that happened, almost like I believed I hadn't seen it at all. Apparently Ididn't like it particularly much and something tells me it can't have had that good of a story if it's possible to forget it after just one week. After having seen the trailer it looked promising, and some of the scenes from the trailer I actually remember. Maybe I'll see it again sometime in the future, but right now that's not an very appaeling idea.Fun to see Rupert Friend, who played Mr Wickham in the 2005 production of Pride and Prejudice. Not entirely easy to recognize him maybe, but there he is. I haven't seen the later season of Homeland, but he appears there as well.
shinsrevenge
A nearly invincible enemy, who can't be defeated by knifes, bullets or car crashes: check. Ability to see into the future to prevent bad decisions: check. Ah yes, there's also Agent 47.With that told let's see what this movie has to offer. A decent amount of action, an okay story, a few nice and surprising plot twists and some almost psychic elements that are too far stretched to be believable.Now I'm not familiar with the world of Hit-man and only saw the first movie from 2007. I appreciate a good action movie. For that we have Agent 47. But the other actress, "Katia van Dees" has some really weird and out of place powers. She can see what happens in places beyond her vision or even what's going to happen next.Surprisingly enough I'm not complaining about their antagonist, the Terminator-like John Smith. He has some skin modifications that prevent him for getting severely wounded and even though he can bleed a lot after taking a few bullets in the chest, that won't have him lying down for long. But that's technology, not some kind of psychic foretelling magic.Anyway, Agent 47 helps Katia find an old man. The bad guys are also after him, because he knows how to make Agents (and apparently witches too). There are high speed pursuits, lots of shooting and kills. The usual. I think 7 out of 10 is a fair rating. While it may be far from flawless, it will keep you entertained. Even though it's not as good as the first movie.
