Claysaba Excellent, Without a doubt!!

BallWubba Wow! What a bizarre film! Unfortunately the few funny moments there were were quite overshadowed by it's completely weird and random vibe throughout.

Usamah Harvey The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.

Dana An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

shubhamsrivastavalu What does a 14 year old do when he enters the game of adults. The fight against Dragons, the direct encounter with Voldemort were scenes enough to give goosebumps. The yes the unfateful demise of Cedric Diggory was a heart touching one. Friends for all times, the beautiful age of loving making; the chemistry of Hermoine, Ron and Victor Krum added to the story. Harry comes ous strong and victorious yet suffers the death of his friend. Most amusing of all parts. Must watch for all.

brendon_mccann Does no one else think it odd that children are thrown up against real dragons, murderous underwater creatures and whatever the maze might do to them after having been warned in no uncertain terms of the danger to life and limb ........ and then horrified, shocked and grief stricken that " a boy was killed" in the end. What were they expecting could happen in the three contests?

EBJ Directed By: Mike NewellStarring: Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert GrintOverall: This movie is good. It's not great but it's good. It's one of the worst Harry Potter franchise but they are all pretty good.Good:1. It's my personal favourite individual storyline of the series and sets things in motion for the next 4 entries to the franchise.2. Ralph Fiennes is marvelous and spectacular and phenomenal as Voldermort that, in perhaps 10 minutes screen time, he becomes one of the most memorable and interesting components of the series.3. Brendan Gleeson does an excellent job as Mad Eye Moody, who is also one of my favourite characters in the Wizarding World.4. As per usual, Maggie Smith, Alan Rickman, Robbie Coltrane and Michael Gambon do great in each of their roles.5. A thankful improvement from 3, is the acting capability of the main trio. Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint are all much better in their roles this time around than in 'Prisoner of Azkaban'.6. Set, Costume and Creature design were all spectacular and really added to the wonder of this world.7. The grand reveal at the end was excellent.8. The action scenes are 10x better in this movie than in Prisoner of Azkaban with each trial having spectacular set pieces and just plain action in general.Bad:1. I really hated the cinematography in the movie and it just looked horrible.2. More peaceful and character driven scenes, such as the Yule ball, suffered due to the greater focus on action. For example, the sweets scene in PoA or the breakfast scene in CoS feel natural and character driven were these scenes feel like filler to bloat run time, even if they were in the books.3. I despise the opening to the movie with the Qudditch world cup and could be much better if it was better wrote and perhaps a tad bit longer, thus replacing some scenes later on.4. {SPOILERS}: The Death of Barty Crouch feels like it goes nowhere and makes you wonder how their wasn't more security and defence to stop this from happening.7/10

mistoppi After the magnificent Prisoner of Azkaban, The Goblet of Fire is just a horrible downgrade. Yes, the book is long and there's no way every scene would be in it, but so much has been left behind. The beginning is butchered, so is the school year. Now it seems like nothing else happened except for the Triwizard Tournament. The main characters had like one class during the entire year. They should've made the movie longer. Three hours may be a long movie, but it's better to make it long than make it seem like all this happened in few months instead of one school year. Seasons barely changed!This film includes the one change everyone hates: Dumbledore was supposed to calmly ask Harry if he put his name in the goblet of fire, but for some reason Michael Gambon's Dumbledore is furious 24/7 and even violent. It makes no sense. Of course Dumbledore is quite a reckless headmaster, but with Richard Harris he seemed gentle, just the right way. If Michael Gambon can't pull of that kind of gentleness, they should've cast someone else. Everyone loved Harris, he was the perfect Dumbledore. After he died, did the people in charge of casting just think, "Ah, f@#k it, let's choose someone completely different". One thing I like is how dark the ending is. It's a good prelude to how dark the last movies are going to be. Of course now it seems like the movies are starting to be too scary for kids. It's hard for me to watch few scenes because of how gruesome they are, so how do they except children to watch them? All the charm Prisoner of Azkaban is gone. If one Harry Potter movie clearly needs a remake, it's this one.