Containment

2015 "No water. No power. No explanation. No escape."
4.9| 1h17m| R| en
Details

Neighbors in a block wake one morning to find they have been sealed inside their apartments. Can they work together to find out why? Or will they destroy each other in their fight to escape?

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

Pluskylang Great Film overall
Matialth Good concept, poorly executed.
Rio Hayward All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.
Fleur Actress is magnificent and exudes a hypnotic screen presence in this affecting drama.
shellbyjones-75305 This movie kept me on the edge of my seat the whole time. Lee Ross is fabulous as Mark and Louise Brealey is always wonderful. Great movie, would recommend to anyone looking for a scary, claustrophobic thriller!
mutlut-13121 Another bad British film it looks like they got actors from a supermarket they simply can't act im wondering did they get paid to act in this rubbish film or did they pay the film makers to give them a role in this film shame I couldn't rate 0
cmovies-99674 PROS: Something that I can say without a doubt that was at least better than OK was the location. The movie set up a great environment with some greatly scripted characters. One location, a common enemy, and people who don't trust each other. The way the movie was set up it would've thrived as a psychological horror, but instead they went down a different alley. If they stuck with what the knew, then this movie would've been a blockbuster hit and set apart from other films of its time. The last good thing that I can say about this film was the way the plot was slowly revealed over time. You went back and forth from knowing to not knowing which gave this movie a pretty good amount of tension.CONS: From beginning to end the one big fault lied in the actors. Although the dialogue was realistic the way that it was delivered was poor. For the readers that don't know, I participate in theater and theater related activities, and as an actor I become really alert to how characters should be acting in specific environments, with specific lines, in contrast to the other characters around them. This movie however, was just very frustrating. When an actor didn't have lines they weren't relevant and they just sat their waiting for it to become their turn, this in turn slowed down the rising action leading to an uneventful climax. The only thing in the movie that was bad though was the ending. All the things I talked about earlier were "ok", but the ending was just plain bad. If you see the movie you'll understand, but the ending just fell flat and was very worthless.www.chorror.com
duncan_cowan This is a first rate low-budget thriller. There's obviously shades of early Cronenberg in the subject matter, but more to the fore are wonderful nods to John Carpenter in the staging, photography and siege theme: Your enemies are inside as well as out; think Assault on Precinct 13 meets The Thing. The lighting often relies upon ambient sources and this adds tremendous atmosphere the to proceedings. Performances are very good, growing stronger throughout the runtime and dialogue is often crisp, to the point and wonderfully witty, squeezing the most out of each scene, without slowing down the pace. I found this just as satisfying as the big studio tentpole releases.