A Christmas Carol

2004
6.3| 1h27m| en
Details

Miser Ebenezer Scrooge is awakened on Christmas Eve by spirits who reveal to him his own miserable existence, what opportunities he wasted in his youth, his current cruelties, and the dire fate that awaits him if he does not change his ways. Scrooge is faced with his own story of growing bitterness and meanness, and must decide what his own future will hold: death or redemption.

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 7-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

TrueJoshNight Truly Dreadful Film
Griff Lees Very good movie overall, highly recommended. Most of the negative reviews don't have any merit and are all pollitically based. Give this movie a chance at least, and it might give you a different perspective.
Paynbob It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.
Staci Frederick Blistering performances.
Doug Kranz I have seen several live performances as well as about every DVD/VHS and TV special of A Christmas Carol. This one is second favorite of all time, first being Live at the wonderful Pabst Theater in Milwaukee, WI. I don't mind that creative license was used during this musical. The meaning of the story is the same. Kelsey Grammar plays the role of Scrooge perfectly. I have no thoughts of his role as Dr. Frazier Crain, as he brings the role of Scrooge to life. There is something special about seeing a heart being softened, and it is as if you can feel the heart of Scrooge soften, and grow. My Christmas season does not start nor is it complete without seeing this musical.
Michael_Elliott Christmas Carol, A (2004)** (out of 4) Musical version of Charles Dickens' novel features Kelsey Grammar as Ebenezer Scrooge, the old miser who is visited by three ghosts who hope to show him the right way to live. A Christmas TALE has been filmed dozens of times since the silent days so it's always a challenge for filmmakers to tell the story in a new way. This one here decides to have Alan Menken do the music and I'm sure fans of his are going to enjoy the treatment. With that said, I think fans of the story are going to be disappointed because the heart of Dickens story is pretty much removed and replaced by scenes that are either boring or really serve no purpose on the story. We get more footage from Scrooge's childhood and this includes seeing his father taken away to prison as well as him working in a boot factory. Neither item is from the original novel and neither add anything here. The creepiness of the story has pretty much been watered down as the ghosts aren't a tad bit scary and none of the situations are directed to further any of the story. Instead we get a lot of musical numbers but I found most of them to be boring. Again, fans of musicals might enjoy them more but I found all of them to be rather poorly staged and they didn't do anything for the actual story. If you're going to film Dickens most famous story then you might want to write your musical numbers around the actual story. There's one nice number between Cratchit and his son but that's about it. The stuff with the three ghosts really don't work, although Jason Alexander does a good job as Marley's ghost. Those who have seen the 1910 version of FRANKENSTEIN are going to notice that his ghost looks exactly like the monster from that film. Grammar isn't too bad as Scrooge but he pretty much gets lost in the musical numbers. Jennifer Love Hewitt, Jane Krakowski and Geraldine Chaplin appear quickly but add very little.
bigmura One of the interesting things about A Christmas Carol is that, since there is no copyright on it, anybody can do anything with the story that they wish. This version has some interesting twists. Scrooge and Marley refusing to help old Fezziwig himself!? Wow, I'd never seen that. And the Spirit of Christmas Yet to Come played by an old woman who wears a chicken costume (Sorry, that's what her costume looks like.) I know it's Geraldine Chaplin and all, but it seemed a little weird.NEvertheless, it was a fine production. My only real complaint is that the songs ran on and on...they seemed much longer...and repetitious...than necessary. But maybe it's just me.Definitely worth a look. I say Kelsey Grammar is one of the best actors of our time. (Not based on this movie, necessarily, but that's what made me want to see it in the first place.)
David C. Bohn I am a huge fan of Charles Dickens' 'A Christmas Carol'. I've read the short story at least once, every Christmas Season, since 1995, and it is my absolute most favorite piece of literature ever written. It therefore follows, that I am also a huge fan of the major cinematic productions based on the story, which I have seen over the years (Though that doesn't necessarily mean that I like them all).The many different cinematic productions of this story are practically uncountable. But, of the major versions I have seen, I have chosen 8 as my favorites, based on their adherence to Dickens' original story: Under the title of 'Scrooge', there is the 1935 version, with Sir Seymour Hicks , the 1951 version – With Alastair Sim, and the 1970 musical, with Albert Finney. Under the title 'A Christmas Carol', there's the 1938 version, with Reginald Owen as Scrooge, the 2009 Disney version, with Jim Carrey, and the made-for-TV productions: 1984 – With George C. Scott, 1999 – With Patrick Stewart, and this one – Officially titled: 'A Christmas Carol: The Musical' – Which I must rank #4.Two years ago, I could hardly contain my excitement, when I heard that the Mike Ockrent/Lynn Ahrens Broadway musical had been turned into a TV movie. There are many who had fallen into the 'Oh-no-not-another-version!', attitude, but not me. I was, however, a bit apprehensive about the fact that it was a musical. I'm not, and never have been a great fan of musicals, but, the two musical versions of this story have made me appreciate them much more, and they've begun to grow on me – Especially this one. And… I gotta admit… I was pretty darned impressed! Kelsey Grammar is the 2nd American to play the central character, and does a heckuva fine job. He was 49, at the time, and some good makeup gives him a few more years, to bring him more visually into the role. He does some fine singing, and – Though he's no George C. Scott, or Alastair Sim – He does quite well in the acting department. He did, however, seem to be having a bit of trouble, here and there, keeping his English accent, but, his "Bah! Humbug!" is the best I've ever heard.Jason Alexander makes an acceptable Jacob Marley. He's a pretty good singer, and does well with some complicated choreography. But, the real stars of the scene, in Scrooge's home, that Christmas Eve night, are the various other ghosts, and some marvelous 21st century special effects, courtesy of Zoltán Benyó, and his Team of Digital Artists.In a film so full of fine performances, it's tough to single any of them out. Edward Gower shines as Bob Cratchit, with some great singing and acting, and Jacob Moriarty makes an excellent Tiny Tim. Moriarty is obviously a competent Actor and Singer, and the chemistry between him, and his on-screen Dad becomes quite evident in some heart-tugging scenes that they have together.Jane Krakowski's graceful moves, and gorgeous singing voice make her performance as 'The Ghost Of Christmas Past' a delight. Jesse L. Martin makes a fine 'Ghost Of Christmas Present'. He's gentle at times, tough at others, and his singing and dancing are marvelous. Julian Ovenden handles quite well, the role of Fred (Scrooge's Nephew), and, Geraldine Chaplin does very well, as The Ghost Of Christmas Yet To Be. The only female, to date, to play the part, Chaplin's face is fully visible, thanks to a costume far different from the traditional black, hooded robe.Other notable performances include: Jennifer Love Hewitt as Scrooge's lost love, Emily (Why these Writers keep changing the name of this character, I'll never know. What's wrong with the name Dickens gave her?!), Brian Bedford as Mr. Fezziwig, Josh Wilmott, as the 10 year-old Ebenezer, Leah-Verity White as Scrooge's Sister, Fan, and an outstanding performance by Steven Miller, as the young Scrooge. It takes a good Actor to make you hate his character, and Miller's performance had me cursing at him. In fact, I was tempted to throw things at my TV, during one particular scene. Also, pay particular attention to a wonderful little Actress by the name of Emily Deamer, who plays Grace Smythe – The little girl whose Mother has passed away, and whose Father asks for sympathy from Scrooge. Deamer's screen time is short, and her lines few, but her voice is Angelic, and it didn't take much for her to steal my heart. And, as you'll see, she comes very close to melting Scrooge's frozen heart, in one very brief scene, early on.Lynn Ahrens' teleplay doesn't adhere to the book as well as I'd have liked. She rewrites some book scenes, omits others, and combines still others. But it all works, fits, and flows very well.In short, this is a delightful movie. Excellent photography, editing, sets, costumes, special effects, and score, were all expertly put together by Director Arthur Allan Seidelman. Some spectacular dance numbers – Including the outstanding 'Mr. Fezziwig's Annual Christmas Ball' – And the absolutely beautiful Mike Ockrent/Lynn Ahrens songs – In particular: 'Christmas Together', 'You Mean More To Me Than Anything', and 'God Bless Us Every One' (Not to be confused with the different song of the same title, from the 1984 version) – Make this movie quite an enjoyable experience.