V.I.P.

1998

Seasons & Episodes

  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

EP20 True Val Story May 04, 2002

4.2| 0h30m| TV-14| en
Synopsis

While attending a Hollywood premiere with a famous action star, a crazed fan pulls a gun—but her movie hunk turns into a coward, and it's Vallery who becomes the hero. Suddenly, she's thrown into a world of action and danger as owner of a Hollywood protection agency, Vallery Irons Protection (V.I.P.), taking risks to protect others at a price few are willing to pay.

Director

Producted By

Global Medien KG

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Also starring Shaun Baker

Reviews

Artivels Undescribable Perfection
JinRoz For all the hype it got I was expecting a lot more!
Stellead Don't listen to the Hype. It's awful
Guillelmina The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.
cselby_ghetto this show isn't so much good as it is addictive. i mainly watched it for Pamela Anderson. but i watched it so much i became hooked, hooked on the bad acting, fake fighting, and unreal plots. yes for you people like me Spike TV(channel 39) usually plays two episodes in a row at 11 am and 12 am everyday. and sometimes at 9 at night and if they show movies or something its usually on at random times later at night. Now that i have seen most episodes its safe to say this show is "okay" i like shaun baker(quick williams) and dustin nguyen. molly culver is not bad looking either. unfortunately the cheesy lines and unbelievably fake fight scenes ruin this show. i could have shot better scenes with my sister in a dark basement wearing sunglasses strung out on dark coffee. at least make it look like you hit the guy. anyway that is all.
spinin Before I comment on the show lets get my credentials out of the way. I recently graduated from Indiana University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry and a minor in Mathematics. I have also taken several film/arts courses because of my intense interest in them. I love art, but I am most familiar with film. There is nothing that I enjoy more than a thought-provoking movie. I understand film as art and I appreciate all the great directors (and I'm not talking Spielberg here). Color or B&W, old or new, domestic or foreign, it doesn't matter as long as the film is good. I'm not bragging here, but I'm trying to establish that I do have some intelligence before I get crucified for being an idiot that actually enjoys "VIP" from time to time. One of the things that upsets me is when people complain about a film being stupid when they don't even understand it. This happens with just about any non-conventional movie. However, the same thing can partly be said about "VIP." From most of the negative comments I can see that people are completely missing the point (not all the negative comments). Yes the show is ridiculous, unrealistic, predictable, and features one-dimensional characters, but does it ever pretend to be something better? NO IT DOES NOT. It never pretends that it is not any of the above. It wallows in its ridiculousness and embraces its one-dimensional characters. For those reasons, it will never be a great show, but it can be kind of fun.One comment I read complained about Pammy spying at night in a tight purple outfit and stiletto heels. The reviewer was really bothered by this and believed that it could never happen. Let's think about it... OF COURSE IT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN! THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT! Yes it is simple and silly, but don't miss the fact that that's the point. Would you also complain that Lt. Frank Drebin from the NAKED GUN doesn't really act like a very competent cop? Did the inflatable autopilot in AIRPLANE seem a little too "literal" to you? If so, then you are stupid. The quality of "VIP" and the show's humor cannot be compared to those great comedies, but "VIP" is in the same vein. There have been several witty moments in the series. Not genius, but witty.The characters are supposed to be one-dimensional. Every member of the VIP team has pretty much one characteristic and they just go with it. Is it redundant? Yes it is. But it also makes them into cartoon characters. Why would you watch the Road Runner cartoons many times? It's always the same thing, but it can still be fun. The cars, the colors, the outfits, and the people are all beautiful, but that's the show's style. IT IS NOT AN EXERCISE IN REALISM.Before I give the show too much credit, I do want to say that this is definitely nothing to admire. I think the show is decent if you have nothing else to watch and can be kind of fun. At the same time, there is always that tug of war going on in my brain between the intelligent me and the me who needs to stop thinking in order to enjoy the show. Because "VIP" is so one-dimensional, I don't get much satisfaction from it. The MTV-style editing can be kind of annoying. Everyone in the show is a walking arsenal of guns, but the only time they use them is to shoot other people's guns out of their hands (which is also kind of a funny thing). Everything comes down to hand to hand combat. And when they shoot those gorgeous vehicles, the bullets just bounce off. So all of these things get on my nerves, but they are kind of funny as well. It's all a part of the ridiculous nature of the show. The only time the show is really bad is when it abandons its nature. Anytime it tries to be serious or dramatic it becomes terrible. When the bodyguards actually believe that they are more important than the FBI or the cops, that's when the show is a little stupid. This would be fine if that belief was yet another joke, but the characters do appear to be a little too serious about what they are doing sometimes. Then again, even that can work well in contrast to Pammy's goofiness.The bottom line is there is nothing amazing about this show, but it can be fun in a "cartoonish" way. It does not satisfy in a large variety of ways, but "VIP" can be enjoyable if you are willing to accept its nature. The acting is one-dimensional because that is how it is supposed to be and as that, it is quite good. Pammy herself has never been better. If you look at "Baywatch" or BARB WIRE, there she is a weak actress because she is stretching for dramatic levels that she cannot reach. She is perfect in "VIP" and is very willing to mock herself. Let's not forget all of her great outfits since she does look real good. It's definitely one of the reasons why people watch. "VIP" is a perfectly acceptable show because it is not an insult to our intelligence. It comes straight out and says, "I'm incredibly stupid. If you want, enjoy my stupidity. If not, change the channel." It is infinitely better than a show like "Baywatch" where the melodrama is truly ridiculous and insulting and the acting is pure garbage (because people are trying to act in dramatic ways they cannot). "Baywatch" actually pretends to have a serious story and "VIP" does not. That's what makes it much better. And if you are getting angry about how stupid "VIP" is and how a girl in high-heels could never be a bodyguard, think for a moment. You may be missing the point.
mixedmessage Don't confuse this lighthearted comedy-action series with lightheaded. It never pretends to be anything but a fun distraction. It's got fun people, cute lines, and the plot is clearly intended only to move the characters into a few situations to play around. Yes, it is unlikely; the standard assumptions about bodyguard services are being played upon here. The show is built on caricature and unlikelihood: a curvy beauty concerned with little more than fashion leads a former top Russian agent with a dark past, a weapons-and-explosives expert mob princess, a research and computer expert with a cute naivete, and two guys with style to fight and be extra-masculine among all the curvy women. The characters have perfect hair, custom outfits, fame and money. The settings are saturated colors, big money, celebrities, and expensive toys. Lots of fun stuff so many of us dream about. Sure it's ludicrous and mostly nonsense. Fun nonsense, even silliness, is part of the point. It's not that the characters are thin, they are deliberately light. Their interactions are playful, friendly jibes rather than character assassination. They aren't founded in ego but in exaggeration, and they succeed at each challenge because of ability, effort, and proper social responsibility. It's not that these people can't act -- this style simply doesn't let them show negative or complex emotions. More importantly, the show doesn't degenerate into simple sex gags, innuendo, and adult horseplay at every turn, even though everyone there is acompletely appealing adult. That's not accidental; it would be too easy to let these situations degenerate into prurient coitus interruptus action and almost-saw-you-naked jokes. Typically, plot background is given in simple research dialog, carefully explained by the cute computer expert as the others plan and grimace at the foolishness of clients or the inhumane threats of criminals and spies. The beautiful antihero distracts herself with unusually playful costume changes every few scenes, as she observes the plans and efforts of her colleagues and often confounds both. It's a simple formula, but it's the playful approach and cuteness of the accidents and dialog that make this style work. It's not a tongue-in-cheek approach to action like a Schwarzenegger movie or Die Hard. This is a sassy 'sometimes any of us can do well in spite of how others define us'. Anderson portrays not a dumb blonde, but a hopeful and playful participant making a little from every opportunity. Her character makes the observations and witticisms that seem silly and wise at the same time, and wins the day through some fortuitous quirk or accident. It's not badly made, either. It's got it's own lighting style, some unusual wipe techniques, and the editing focuses on movement. It's dialog is timed just long enough to get character reaction, rarely overlapping each other or rushing the script. Each episode features musical background from a single new album, usually something uncommon and stylish rather than mainstream. (However, I really liked the episode featuring Lit, partly because they so clearly enjoyed fitting the show around a few video-style performances, but mostly because Lit plays such fun, straight-forward rock.) So why isn't it much more popular? That's pretty easy -- not everyone wants to spend time with such a simple story. Such a light formula, simple characterizations, and unlikely plot events requires the user to lower his expectations and just enjoy a show for the fun of it. "VIP" accomplishes that without the lowbrow humor and ridicule that often ruin sitcoms, without mood-thickening personal philosophies, and without the drama and tragedy that expand your understanding of personal motivations and philosophies. "VIP" knows how to be simply fun. This is entertainment.
Bev-7 Like so many I know, I have little interest in any show with a high jiggle factor. I was prepared to hate V.I.P. I caught one episode to watch a guest star and found myself laughing and actually enjoying the show. V.I.P. comes at you on at least two different levels. On one, there is exciting action and uncomplicated plots typical of the A-Team: bad guys who do bad things always get caught by an eclectic team of good guys, each with special talents and rampant egos. On another level, there is glamour, glitz, ditz, jiggle, and jokes making fun of glamour, glitz, ditz, and jiggle, most at Miss Anderson's willing expense. I would recommend V.I.P. and ask that you give it a try. It's actually a fun show.