SpuffyWeb Sadly Over-hyped

Lumsdal Good , But It Is Overrated By Some

Stellead Don't listen to the Hype. It's awful

Lela The tone of this movie is interesting -- the stakes are both dramatic and high, but it's balanced with a lot of fun, tongue and cheek dialogue.

beytibarbaros OMG!!! I ended up watching this movie because of the scene between Liam Neeson and Olivia Wilde where he grabbed her butt on the street. The whole movie, I was overwhelmed by the raw emotions from the cast members. And when I checked the reviews just out of curiosity, I was so surprised. From professional movie critics, to movie bloggers; everybody was in a race to insult and degrade the movie. I loved, loved and loved it. Music was amazing, adding extra emotion to shattered lives. Again, when someone comes out and creates something that very few could understand, it doesn't go unpunished.

jancapek-cz I found nothing fundamentally wrong with this picture. Is it slightly predictable? Yes, but breathtaking twists are not always necessary for a film to be good. And I did not feel insulted by the subtle hints that were carefully dispersed to lead us up to what was coming in the end. The acting was PHENOMENAL, the interior design a treat to the eye, the camera... the directing... the dialogues... What am I missing here? Why does "Iron Man: Civil War" warrant 7.5, but "Third Person" no more than 4 out of 10?

Lola A Enigmatic and confusing.Real-life link: when you are the 'other' you are always the other. There is a reason why you are not official its that bond that leads to marriage that is missing. Being attractive helps, not beautiful but attractive. Emotions are behind every action and every reason. Plausibility: all good. Jealous ex, jealous other. All real life situations that can happen. The only implausible one is the one where a men is ready to pat thousands of dollars for a stranger.Storytelling: very confusing. I personally believe that non of those tales were real and that they only existed in the writers mind. The writer lived through them. None of that was real. If that is not the case then the storytelling is quite boring since you have separate tales that do not link to each other. If it was not all in the writers head then the locations were also all pretty mixed up. Casting: great actors and fit for their roles. Good acting as a result and good chemistry between the actors. In general, a good movie. Just confusing in terms of what was real and what not.

Ravid Wow great movie. Spoiler alert !!! Don't read this if you haven't seen the film and intend to.It seems like 4 different story lines but something Dident add up, Mila cunis was in NY and the writer in Paris so how was it that she was in the same hotel room as the writer? This made me suspect something other then a linear storyline... Also when the Adrian brody character and the writer had an almost similar accident... Then the car with Moran and Adiran despaired i kinda knew thease where figments of the writer's imagination...so what was the real story? Only the writer? Was his lover even real? If not why was his wife blaming him on speeking to the lover while the boy was in the pool? Or did he talk to the publisher? Hell I don't know... It seemed like the writer was trying to make things right again in his mind. Good film