Stometer Save your money for something good and enjoyable

Mjeteconer Just perfect...

Moustroll Good movie but grossly overrated

Donald Seymour This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

creationstems I give this film a 10/10 for personal reasons, though I think an average score of 5.9/10 is an awful joke. It goes to show the mainstream are as often wrong as they are right. The Time Machine has everything I love in a movie: existentialism, loss, abstract symbolism and reflection, mystical fantasy of the serious kind, bold adventure and traveling to the far-far reaches of the future, a beautiful and passionate main character, a powerful lesson learned in the end, and easily one of the best soundtracks I have ever heard. Listen to halfway through Stone Language. This movie itself is up there with Mulholland Dr.

A Lazy Bear The movie is suitably casted, the visuals are nice, diverse, vibrant and the score is good. It is a well rounded, fun action-adventure without anything sticking out (neither good nor bad), although i did like the villain who sadly appears not for long.Compared to the book and 1960 version, this movie seems rather bland though. Every bit of message you could take away from them, is lost in this movie. The novel/1960-version made you feel alienated among the humans, their culture, their looks, their behavior and the language barrier. I don't want to go into too much detail with explaining and interpreting the contents, instead I just want to give a tip: either watch both movies (this first) or only watch the 1960 version. Its easier to follow, closer to the book and has more thought-provoking content.

allyatherton A poor retelling of the original novel and bookStarring Guy PearceBased on the book by H G WellsScreenplay by David Duncan and John LoganDirected by Simon WellsI was quite excited to catch up with this movie as I am a big fan of the original novel and the original film, but I was less than impressed.I felt deflated watching this. Fair play to them that they have tried to create something different rather than just copying the original movie but it has lost all of the magic and charm completely. The original Time machine kept you glued to the screen, it captured your imagination, this didn't sadly.There's plenty of action and thrills but that didn't make up for the loss of the awe and wonder. And Samantha Mumba? Really? That's just poor casting. She couldn't act her way out of a packet of crisps.6/10

Gemini54 sorry totally away from the wonderful,original there was never a romantic interest in it oh dear truly awful cant stand when any classic is remade away from the original leave great classics alone. I mean it doesn't even start of properly with his friends there at the end before the beginning why is it set in new York it should be London, if your going to base it on H.G. Wells novel at least get the location right I'm sorry this was naff. There is no romantic interest in it at the start he was Emglish not American I'm sorry but why did it not follow the same time line pattern in his journey wherever gets off innthe first. world war to meet his friends son. also as if their going to learn English while others talk cave language the young girl,didn't look surprised st all All so daft.