Lucybespro It is a performances centric movie

Taraparain Tells a fascinating and unsettling true story, and does so well, without pretending to have all the answers.

Portia Hilton Blistering performances.

Kayden This is a dark and sometimes deeply uncomfortable drama

paulclaassen Oh, look, Nell is back for another round of possession. Jeez, how many false scares can you cram into one movie? There was a lot going on here without anything happening. It was like a bunch of ideas put together, but did not form a concrete plot or story. It felt like it was going in circles. This was a completely unnecessary sequel. There are some nice effects during the climax, but I'm afraid I've lost interest by then.

yaktheripper I wasn't a big fan of the "The Last Exorcism"; for myself it was an average scare flick, not a really a gem of the genre. The creatively titled "The Last Exorcism II" however is an inspired and creepy journey towards one woman's and perhaps humanities doom. The low score you'll see on the home page is due to a lack of imagination in today's average movie goer. A great deal of suspense built into this movie is visceral...it's what your NOT seeing that is disturbing. And that is what ticks me off about the low scores. Okay...so there's no monster chopping off heads or people being physically tortured or women showing their breasts. So it burns a little slow...so it uses atmosphere and environment to build tension, is this a reason to rate it low? If you have no imagination and can't focus on a movie for more then 10 minutes if there's no blood or CGI monsters to be found then yes....I guess it is. The director's behind this little gem hopefully are off to make even better movies and I look forward to what they can do in the future. Well done! Fans of demonic movies with a little bit of intelligence...this flick is for you...fans of gore and sex ONLY...steer clear.

kosmasp After the first movie being Found footage, this goes the "traditional" ("normal" movie) route. Of course it does make sense to have watched the first movie, before going into this. It does work without it (especially because you do get remarks and everything else you need to part 1), but it works better if you have seen the first one.When I saw the rating, I was expecting something much worse. And while it does have clichés and you will know where this is leading to (beware of some nudity and sexual situation if that "destroys" a movie for you), it also has some very nice touches - no pun intended. We get some people from part one reprising their roles (some expected some unexpected). Not great but still way better than generic stuff such as "Nothing left to fear".

SnoopyStyle Nell Sweetzer (Ashley Bell) is trying to recover from the events of the first movie. She is sent to a safe house in New Orleans with other girls trying to restart their lives. She is an innocent, and still haunted by the demon Abalam. She gets a hotel housekeeping job, and even a boyfriend Chris. But she can't escape Abalam, and mysterious Cecile may be able to exorcise the demon once and for all.The original had the benefit of an indie realism. That is to say that it pretends to be real like 'Blair Witch Project'. It also had Ashley Bell bending over backwards in a (is she?)/(isn't she?) story. This one is much more traditional. Ashley Bell is quite effective as the naive Nell. The movie has a slow moving gentle feel. But when the time comes to pump up the scares, they pull all the punches. The kills are happening off screen. The traditional camera moves just aren't there. If Ashley Bell wasn't there, I would definitely fail this movie.