CrawlerChunky In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

TaryBiggBall It was OK. I don't see why everyone loves it so much. It wasn't very smart or deep or well-directed.

Loui Blair It's a feast for the eyes. But what really makes this dramedy work is the acting.

Guillelmina The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.

andrew jones There is nothing new about the old dark house routine...the family members gathering on a stormy night and some hidden treasure in the mix...The House in Nightmare Park, however, manages to escape the cliché and turns out to be perfect...I wouldn't change anything about the film.Struggling ham actor and general vain coward Foster Twelvetrees is invited to give some of his "inimitable renditions" (as he calls them) at a remote Gothic country mansion by head of the family Stewart Henderson (Ray Milland)After being dumped some distance from the house and his bags thrown at him Foster makes his way to the sinister looking mansion. We are shown how well Foster copes with scares when he hears a scream and takes off like a scalded cat. Also note some very good lighting and close ups with the lightning effects as Foster firsts sees the house. Very well done. Ray Milland is faultless in his portrayal of Stuart Henderson. Some of his looks of disbelief at Foster's acting are priceless.What ensues for the rest of the film is an amazing blend of comedy (sometimes subtle sometimes blatant) superb camera work and lighting and of course first class acting from all concerned. Another star of the film that must be acknowledged is the interior set used. The imposing Oakley court was used for the exterior shots so the interior had to be equally intriguing. The film is set in 1907 and the interior of the Henderson home captures the faded charm of the recently ended Victorian era. The wall paper, carpets, fire places all pay tribute to this era as well as conveying it in a slightly run down format. The well worn look has been very well dealt with. Finishing touches such as damp running down the wall near Foster's bedroom at to the effect. The Henderson family having spent a number of years in India have converted to the Hindu faith and brought back statues of the goddess Kali. This aspect worked very well and added a new dimension.Things don't get any easier for our cowardly hero Foster as more of the Henderson family turn up in the middle of the night under mysterious circumstances, a bed ridden Henderson is discovered..Or is he? , and to top it all a deranged old lady hidden in the attic offers him tea and then tries to end his ham acting career with a meat clever. Some excellent comic moments are shown between Hugh Burden as Reggie Henderson and Howard. Reggie takes an instant dislike to Foster and a series of mini stand offs come and go. These range from a battle over the last egg at breakfast (complete with antique silver in true mansion style) to Foster being called a swine endlessly. Another attempt on Foster's life comes in the form of a third Henderson brother named Ernest. Ernest and his wife Agnes are more switched on than Reggie and I dare say a lot more murderous. After quickly working out Foster is the key to finding a missing fortune in diamonds they try to bump him off with an injection of poison to the gums! Ernest is posing as a dentist while actually a vet! Kenneth Griffith turns in a top notch performance as Ernest if a bit short on air time.The Henderson family and their "dance of the dolls" routine is a mix of the bizarre with hilarity and sinister over tones added. The camera work is again top notch and you get the effect like looking in the back of the spoon.I first taped this film many years ago on VHS late one night. It never seems to be shown on TV so I had a long wait until it was realised on DVD. The wait was worthwhile. The quality is excellent; visually it looks like it was made yesterday. Director Peter Sykes had already directed a hammer horror film prior to The House In Nightmare Park so you get his amazing use of odd camera angles and creepy lighting shown off to the max. I don't believe the horror element would have worked as well if a director with no horror film experience had been hired. Sykes also does another brilliant thing... He keeps Frankie Howard's performance from getting to over the top and too full of ooooo aaaaa's the balance is great. I once read that Howard thought this was his best film. I certainly believe it is.I hope you enjoy this film as much as I do; it seems to have a timeless charm. Ps, spare a thought for poor Foster Twelvetrees as he's left alone on his newly acquired bleak estate digging for diamonds. I wonder if he ever found them.

Paul Andrews The House in Nightmare Park is set in England during 1907 & starts as stage actor Foster Twelvetrees (Frankie Howerd) is invited to perform his one man show at an old stately mansion owned by Stewart Hendersen (Ray Milland) & his sick brother. More of the Hendersen family arrive & seem to start arguing about money & their sick brother, Foster learns that he is in fact the rightful heir to the Hendersen fortune as well as a million pounds of diamonds that are hidden somewhere in the manor. Unaware that he holds the clue to the diamonds whereabouts the Hendersen's try to trick Foster into revealing where they are but to no avail, soon the bodies start piling up as someone in the house will kill for the diamonds & wealth they will bring. Can Foster survive long enough to solve the clues & find the diamonds?This unjustly obscure British production was directed by Peter Sykes & is a mix of dark Gothic Victorian horror, innuendo laced comedy & gags & a murder mystery whodunit all neatly packaged together in an old dark house style chiller. The script effectively juggles laughs, one-liners, a bit of horror, a passable murder mystery, some hidden diamonds & some weird scenes that make The House in Nightmare Park really quite an enjoyable watch. At 90 odd minutes it moves along at a decent pace & there's a decent double twist ending that is reasonable but maybe not as effective as it could have been, the final shot of Howerd planting his spade into the ground & the camera zooming out for literally miles is a nice way to end things. The horror ranges from killer Snakes & meat clever wielding bald women living in the attic (!) to fog swept moors where murder takes place, the comedy ranges from one-liners like 'Yoo-hoo! I'm here... the entertainment's arrived! I've played empty houses before, but blimey...' when walking into an empty house to 'It's a bit dry for my taste. I prefer it a bit... wetter' while drinking some wine to visual gags like Howerd not being able to get anything to eat while the murder mystery aspect is quite good with a fair few bodies although no-one is killed on screen. There's an amazingly weird & odd scene in which the Hendersen's dress up as puppets & perform a song & dance which is frankly bizarre & has to be seen to be believed.Almost impossible to find these days I don't think The House in Nightmare Park has ever been released on DVD & it hasn't been shown on television over here in the UK for over a decade. I'm not sure why really, the atmospheric house & sets coupled with the murder mystery plot & a name like Frankie Howerd surely makes this worth releasing on a digital format? Surprisingly well shot with some Hammer horror style atmospherics & Victorian era production design. The murders occur off-screen & there's no real blood or gore in it.The imposing house featured in The House in Nightmare Park was actually Oakley Court in Windsor in Berkshire which was used for all manner of films such as The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975) & lots of Hammer horror films including Dracula (1958), The Brides of Dracula (1960), The Plague of the Zombies (1966) & The Reptile (1966). The cast is great, Frankie Howerd puts in a good performance full of sly sexual innuendos & funny faces while Ray Milland as the villain is also good.The House in Nightmare Park is a fun horror comedy murder mystery with a great atmosphere that works surprisingly well on many levels, while maybe not for all tastes I found it highly amusing & very watchable. Much better than expected, while not as out & out funny as Carry on Screaming (1966) it's creepier by far.

Stink_Face First off this is the only review I've ever posted for a film, so that must say something about how strongly I feel for this one in particular, it really is a good film and I assure you is most enjoyable, you will not regret watching it.Secondly I would like to Pooh-Pooh The_Void from Beverley Hills, England's review (see above or below or wherever it is located) what utter tosh! this film is remarkable, a great cast, great atmosphere, engaging story of horror and in-family skulduggery, I don't know what film you were watching mate but to be honest you say that the jokes fell flat and blah, blah, blah but you then put your very own handle as "The_Void from Beverley Hills, England" is that supposed to be some sort of "funny" joke? Well, if that's the extent of your humour, no wonder you didn't enjoy this flick.This is a very rare film and if you get the chance to catch it I'd seriously recommend it.

smithers-5 This would be a fairly ordinary British seventies film but for its two main stars. This is a rare opportunity to see Frankie Howard in a starring role, and he does not disappoint. Ray Milland, too, is at his best, as a less camp (and in my view superior) version of Vincent Price. Direction is good, and tension and atmosphere are maintained well throughout the film. A must for Frankie Howard fans.