Afouotos Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

Curapedi I cannot think of one single thing that I would change about this film. The acting is incomparable, the directing deft, and the writing poignantly brilliant.

Paynbob It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.

Jenni Devyn Worth seeing just to witness how winsome it is.

theowinthrop Shown last night on Turner Classic Films, THE FUZZY PINK NIGHTGOWN was based on a novel that was published in 1956. The story is simple: A man has just been released from prison after four years, serving a major crime sentence for something he did not do. The man and his friend are hired by a conniving film studio head to waylay the studio's leading bombshell actress, who has just made a film about a kidnapping, and subsequently "demand" a ransom. Gradually the man and the star get to know each other, fall in love, and various complications emerge (dealing with the man's friend/associate in the fake kidnapping, with the miscalculation of the producer who finds few people in the public believe it's a real kidnapping, and with the suspicions of the Police Detective who has been involved with the man since arresting him in the first crime four years earlier). Like most situation comedies, the central story line makes little real sense. If a man is freed after any time from a prison, either because he was erroneously arrested or because he was guilty but has served his sentence, he will try to avoid idiotic plans that can land him back into jail again. Ralph Meeker was wrongly convicted of second degree murder, and then the real killer was discovered. He is (as is repeated several times) not a real convict (meaning he is not "hardened" - at least supposedly). If so, he certainly would not be roped into such a silly publicity stunt that could be made to look like he is criminal (and end up returning him to jail). Ironically Meeker would shortly play another victim of "judicial injustice" but in a great serious film - he was one of the three soldiers who are court-martial-ed and shot for cowardice under fire in PATHS OF GLORY.His friend Keenan Wynn is a sillier type of mug (Wynn at this time was usually playing side-kicks like Kirk Douglas' friend in MY DEAR SECRETARY or "mugs" like the gangster - with James Whitmore - who is trying to collect a debt from Howard Keel in KISS ME KATE). Interestingly enough, during this film Jane Russell quotes Shakespeare's line "Conscience doth make cowards of us all", and Wynn mulls over the line - making the viewer momentarily think of that glorious duet almost a decade earlier with Whitmore of "Brush Up Your Shakespeare". But KISS ME KATE was a better comedy. Anyway Wynn ends up a voice of reason (!) trying to water down Meeker's bitterness as much as he can. Again it stretches realism to a breaking point to think of Wynn doing this, but he is so disarmingly nice that one roots for him all the same.Russell, as the bombshell actress, is turned into a "Marilyn" clone. This too, like the "Shakespeare" reference for Wynn, makes one think of her appearance a few years earlier with Monroe in GENTLEMEN PREFER BLONDS (again, a superior film), wherein she briefly wears a blond wig to disguise herself as Marilyn. But she openly reveals it's a fake to Meeker and Wynn to help them avoid problems with the police (their friendly nemesis Fred Clark). For her pains Meeker just throws her gesture in her face as proof of her phoniness (which it really isn't).As the movie producer/chief conniver, Adolphe Menjou acts as voluble and dyspeptic as he usually does in such roles, but he was also Oliver Niles, producer - friend of Norman Main in the 1937 A STAR IS BORN, and he was the more wolfish but competent Broadway producer in STAGEDOOR (again two other better films). This movie is full of moments that ironically recall better films. Don't get me totally wrong. While not great cinema, or even good cinema, it is amusing enough. Watch the scene where Russell and Wynn get drunk on his eggnog (it's around Christmas time) made from eggs and straight booze. Or see Clark in any scene - especially when he confronts Meeker and Wynn at their "hideout" (he doesn't know it is one) which is too expensive for them to afford. His cat and mouse with them is worth watching, and reminds us of what a fine comic actor he was. Or Menjou telling the police (Clark and an equally unimpressed Milton Frome) and a "Hedda Hopper" clone (Benay Venuta) of how he definitely did not fake a kidnapping for publicity purposes. Venuta hands the bow-beating, supposedly sorrow-struck Menjou a handkerchief to wipe his eyes - which, of course, have no real tears in them!Towards the end, when Meeker and Russell are speeding in Clark's stolen police car (don't ask!) to get to the airport, they go up a road along a small cliff-side mountain that looks familiar to us. They are trying to stop Wynn from collecting a $100,000 ransom fee and fleeing with it to Mexico. The road and cliff are very familiar: they are the same road and cliff that Spencer Tracy and the cast of IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, WORLD drove in the opposite direction, when Tracy's "Captain Culpepper" had the stolen money in his car and was planning to flee to Mexico. I tell you, every point in this film reminds you of an earlier or later better movie!

Neil Doyle JANE RUSSELL, wearing the worst looking blonde wig since Barbara Stanwyck went blonde for "Double Indemnity", does nothing to enhance the reputation she had after "Gentlemen Prefer Blondes", wherein she sometimes stole scenes from Marilyn Monroe and Charles Coburn. Here she plays a ditsy actress supposedly a blonde bombshell whose latest film is about a kidnapped bride.Here she's not exactly a scene-stealer--in fact, her performance is rather strained and only improves after she takes off that horrendous wig. Then, it improves considerably.No help is the script, a tiresome thing that is silly from the start and wastes some talented people--like ADOLPHE MENJOU, RALPH MEEKER and KEENAN WYNN. Meeker seems so uninterested in his role that it shows. Badly.Meeker and Wynn are partners in a kidnapping scheme that fails to go smoothly because Russell is a regular spitfire who proves hard to handle, until she decides the kidnapping would be good publicity for her latest film. The script only gets worse as it goes along, with only FRED CLARK able to put some laughs into a brief supporting role.Summing up: A really clumsy script, it does nothing for the careers of Russell, Meeker or Wynn who have all done better elsewhere.

David (Handlinghandel) Ralph Meeker looks great. He tended toward puffiness in the all too few movies he made after the great "Kiss Me Deadly." Here he is trim and does a good job (with little to work with.) Keenan Wynn is all right. He played sidekicks -- sort of the Tony Randall of the 1950s.Jane Russell wears the title outfit. She got a bad rap as an actress. She was hilarious in "Gentleman Prefer Blondes" and very convincing in her adventure/thrillers with Robert Mitchum.Here she is OK. Her acting is OK, that is. But she's supposed to be a movie star at her peak and this is a little hard to buy. I remember her TV ads in which she spoke of "us full-figured gals." These came a couple decades after "The Fuzzy Pink Nightgown." But the nightgown, and everything she wears, looks like a maternity frock. She looks big here. In the beginning of the film she wears a long blonde wig. It is monumentally unbecoming. She looks better when she takes it off.Still, the movie is a disappointment. It's always a treat to see Meeker. And the supporting cast comprises familiar faces and is amusing. But the movie is a misfire. Russell and Meeker have no particular chemistry. It isn't touching. And it isn't really very funny, director Taurog notwithstanding.

hooligan5 I recently saw this film for the first time, and thoroughly enjoyed it! I'm a big Ralph Meeker fan, so that's what motivated me to watch it, since I can't find many films in which he played leads. I liked how Jane Russell's movie star character who is in control of her career (who happens to be a smart business "girl") interacted with his angry man character! It's not the best movie ever made, but it is very entertaining...I can't believe it 'flopped' when it came out! Maybe it was ahead of its time, or maybe the idea of kidnapping isn't funny to moviegoers! Anyhoo, it's great fun, has a great score by Billy May (who worked with Frank Sinatra). One of my favorite scenes in the movie is towards the beginning, when "Laurel Stevens" (Jane Russell) is trying to charm/seduce the Ralph Meeker/"Mike" character: While they are talking to each other, he avoids looking at her the whole time, and he turns his body away from her every time she gets closer - through the entire scene! All the while, she is using every feminine wile she can on him to get her way! Very funny!