Nonureva
Really Surprised!
CrawlerChunky
In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.
Tymon Sutton
The acting is good, and the firecracker script has some excellent ideas.
Lachlan Coulson
This is a gorgeous movie made by a gorgeous spirit.
Gafri Ariansyah
Jurassic Prey is a fictional horror film from United guild directed by Mark Polonia .. I watched this movie a few minutes ago via DVD media, this movie is so silly, ugly, so bad, terrible acting, cheap dialogue, plus silly CGI ...Dinosaur appearance in this movie is so ugly and looks fake once ...... It's really the most boring and the worst movie I've ever seen!
maxwendland
I can understand the camera quality. But the CGI? I swear there was stop motion. It was hard to understand. What was with the police with the human dogs? Bad camera shots, bad acting. Not to mention how it was sexist. Also, why would the lady who was robbed become a bad guy?The film made no sense.
Daniel Biehl
****WARNING: There may be spoilers ahead!****This is a Polonia movie and I think most people go into these flicks not thinking quality. That is the case with this movie and I can forgive that when it comes to no-budget flicks. There are, however, a few cardinal rules I have that filmmakers NEED to follow when attempting to make a movie at any budget.1. Don't be boring.Boring usually happens when there is an over reliant on padding. Padding usually means that the producers are putting stuff in to make the movie longer. There is padding in this flick. A lot of people cautiously walking around looking for victims and the monster/dinosaur. I guess stealth is needed as this large t-rex/raptor (could never tell as the scale kept changing) had the keen ability to creep up behind people and eat them without them ever knowing. Well, until it was too late.Another source of padding is expositional dialog. Talking heads presenting (usually setting up) key parts of the story. This leads us to rule 2.2. Show, don't tell.If the characters in the flick are talking about key plot points or character traits then it might be a good idea to take that dialog, throw it out, and write up a few scenes showing the plot point or personality trait. Case in point, the bank robbery scene. When the "real" guns are brought out and passed around there is an argument about using real guns. It plays out like a married couple arguing and is no fun to watch. Especially since the actors aren't top actors. Then it plays out like a poorly acted scene. I think I would have had the lead actor mutter, under his breath, something like, "real guns. I hate real guns. People end up getting hurt." He then could have turned to the provider of guns and said, "you shoot somebody then I'll shoot you." To me this is more interesting and suggests the lead has a bit of a past. Of course this should have been worked out when they were writing this story.If these two rules are followed I generally will find the movie to be entertaining despite the budget or technical limitations. The flick then becomes one of those "so bad it's good" style flicks.
Zach Klinefelter
I have very few positive things to say about "Jurassic Prey". Like most dinosaur flicks from the last few years, it's neither a good movie nor a so-bad-it's-good movie. It probably isn't one of the absolute worst movies I've ever seen, but I'm fairly sure it is somewhere in the "bottom 100" I have watched. It is one of the worst of the prehistoric genre and should be avoided or watched with extremely minimal expectations and some hard liquor.The cast is generally awful in uninteresting ways; there are in fact ways B-movies can save a poor script with colorful characters and/ or colorful character actors, and this movie doesn't attempt to give us anyone to really care or root for, let alone laugh at. The visual effects are hilariously bad, however I cannot condemn them to the degree some reviewers have. Yes, the puppetry and stop-motion is not commendable, but I still prefer it over most of the cheap CGI in low budget dino-flicks the last few years. In fact I was bothered far more by other effects, such as the bad digital flames, blood, and gun flares among other poorly-executed shots.If there were at least a few more redeeming elements (better gore, characters, and script for starters), I'd elevate my rating to a "3" or "4"; as it is, a "2" feels fairly generous.
