XoWizIama
Excellent adaptation.
IncaWelCar
In truth, any opportunity to see the film on the big screen is welcome.
Zandra
The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.
Michael Ledo
This is a Mark Polonoia film, iconic bad film maker. The main question: "Is it so bad it is good, or is it just bad?" Charles Humes (Ken Van Sant) was a carpenter who was working on the infamous Amityville house and he kept the leftover wood from the project. He used this wood on another project and his own home. The demon was transferred in the wood as Charles kills his family with a hammer in the first scene. He alerts Father Benna (Jeff Kirkendall) of the issue who seeks out the home which has the wood.Meanwhile at that house we have Jeremy Dukane (James Carolus) a man who is already possessed by the Jack Jägermeister demon. Amy (Marie DeLorenzo) is his "vulnerable" daughter.The film overall was bad and I doubt most people will make it past 10 minutes. It does have a few bad scenes I had to laugh at such as the "help me" scene, the doll scene, and the climax exorcism. Our demon consisted of a white guy in a red robe, a solid red mask, and a voice distorter. He breathes heavy at time. There was not one "wood" joke, apparently Polonia moving on to a new era. Line reader, Jeff Kirkendall gave us a performance worthy of the death penalty, at least a good egging.Guide: F-word. No sex or nudity.
imdbd1
This version was an interesting spin off of the original 1979 movie, The Amityville Horror, starring Margot Kidder and James Brolin. I enjoyed seeing and discovering the dramatic reaction work of the actress portraying one of the Sister / Daughter at the beginning scene, very convincing performance. Where she notices her mother's torso lying limp on the kitchen table. But very attractive in a bodice and cinematic sense and she could win future film roles in my opinion depending on her career choices.
jeremy-david-kuehnau
What a waste of time, what a load of garbage. There is NOTHING redeeming about this "film". There's not a single good thing I can say about it. Riding the long dead corpse of the Amityville name, it looks as if some kid in high school thought it would be a good idea to use their parents video recorder to try and make a film. Avoid this junk at all costs.
TdSmth5
Someone kills a family with a hammer. Years later this same person confesses to a priest and asks the priest to go to a house to exorcise it. So because of demonic transference, some lumber ended up demonized and the house he's referring to was made with pieces of that lumber and it was the cause for him killing his family.At the house live Amy and her alcoholic dad. The priest makes it over there and as luck would have it around that time Amy start becoming possessed herself when a guy dressed in red appear, so the priest will have to perform an exorcism and the house and then Amy.Yup, Amityville Exorcism is a zero budget horror movie combining the fashionable exorcism sub-genre with the deceptive Amityville title. It has nothing to do with the Amityville franchise. It has that cheap camera look, weird synth sounds, cheesy visual effects, poor acting, etc. It seems to be a two-man operation. Yet there is actually some skill involved. The director seems to have an idea what to do. I was actually going to rate this higher because I thought that the crew didn't have a whole lot of experience, but it turns out the director has directed 39 movies in three decades. The first thing a filmcrew should know is when it's feasible to make a movie and when to put a project on hold. If you've been directing movies for 30 years, why come out at this point with a no-budget movie?
