ThrillMessage
There are better movies of two hours length. I loved the actress'performance.
Humaira Grant
It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.
Portia Hilton
Blistering performances.
Branko Petrovic Era
It is such a crime calling this "movie" 3rd part of, well, nice movies if u like football. Story is so "ill", characters not so accurate, movie follows some World Cup with bad implements of characters on it. Than some so unimportant characters, I mean, not to go farther, really an mess of movie. I feel so sorry for guy acting Santiago Munez that needed to show up on this part. I mean, I hope he took some good money, because everything else will be so embarrassing. Putting that nice girl in it wont help u save this awful movie. Please, if someone is reading this reviews, such as I didn't, do not watch it at all. Imagine there are only 2 parts of movie called "Goal". Thx
florlemo
Horrible, it has nothing to do with the previous films. What happened to the story of Santiago and Roz? In the second, she was pregnant and did not say anything to him and at the end. And in this movie their history becomes others. i was really waiting for the moment that Santi realises that he has a child. but it didn't happened. one of the best parts of these movies was the relationship between them. and in this one, none of the romantics parts added anything to the movie. Regarding the special effects, this time they were worst than the other 2 movies. And the other histories... I didn't understood nothing about the Gothic movie at the beginning and the guys with the van. all seemed disconnected or nothing to do with each other. I am totally disappointed. i don't recommend it to anyone, boring ...
Jorge Fernandez
I don't even know where to start. I was so excited to watch this movie because I loved the first two but this one had nothing to do with them. Like seriously Santiago was barely in it not to mention his mother, brother, ex-girlfriend, or maybe even his child because of the way the second one ended. I really do not understand where the producers came up with the idea that this would fit as a good movie for anyone to watch or even to end a trilogy about a soccer player that becomes famous and in the last movie he doesn't even touch a ball during the whole movie. I think this movie was a waste of my time and hope that whoever plans on watching it "DONT" because you will seriously be disappointed.
James Cairns
Fire the director, fire the writer. What a dose of Rubbish. Watched the first two they were fantastic, could not wait till this came out. How dare they come out with this rubbish, Santi is in it for about 15 minutes, its all about two England players. They cannot help themselves was surprised we never saw anything from 66 what a rip-off. They advertised on the cover gerrard beckham ronaldo's but they are only in it because it was clips from the 2006 world cup. I can only hope that someone can see what a mess was made of goal 3 and have a look at the other films and do it justice and rewrite the whole film again. I would love to know how it goes for Santi and his family and his career after all that was the purpose of the film. SHOULD HAVE NAMED THE FILM DEFLECTED GOAL
