Fluentiama Perfect cast and a good story

Matialth Good concept, poorly executed.

Murphy Howard I enjoyed watching this film and would recommend other to give it a try , (as I am) but this movie, although enjoyable to watch due to the better than average acting fails to add anything new to its storyline that is all too familiar to these types of movies.

Ginger Very good movie overall, highly recommended. Most of the negative reviews don't have any merit and are all pollitically based. Give this movie a chance at least, and it might give you a different perspective.

JohnHowardReid Copyright 27 February 1935 by 20th Century Pictures, Inc. Presented by Joseph M. Schenck. Released through United Artists. New York opening at the Rivoli, 24 February 1935. Australian release: 5 June 1935. 9 reels. 83 minutes. U.K. release title: The MAN FROM THE FOLIES BERGERE.SYNOPSIS: Baron hires an impersonator who falls for the Baron's wife.NOTES: Academy Award, Dave Gould, Dance Direction (for the "Straw Hat" number in this film and the "I've Got a Feelin' You're Foolin'" number in Broadway Melody of 1936).Re-made as That Night In Rio (1941) and On the Riviera (1951).A dismal failure on Broadway, The Red Cat opened at the Broadhurst on 19 September 1934 and closed after only 14 performances. Reviews were uniformly scathing: "A dated comedy with an old-hat plot and threadbare situations." Bertram Harrison directed a cast that included Francis Lister (in a dual role as the entertainer who impersonates a look- alike nobleman), Ruth Weston, Tamara Geva, Rex O'Malley, Porter Hall, and Barnett Parker.20th Century made a French version of Folies Bergére simultaneously with the English-language version. And I do mean simultaneously. I've not seen the French version, L'Homme des Folies Bergére, but an examination of the stills reveals that not only were exactly the same camera set-ups employed, but exactly the same extras occupy exactly the same positions in both movies. For this reason, the French version is officially credited to Roy Del Ruth, though the actors were actually directed by Marcel Achard, who translated (and some say improved) the dialogue, while Albert Willemetz re-penned the French song lyrics. Aside from Chevalier, most of the players were replaced. Natalie Paley was assigned the Merle Oberon role, and Sim Viva was Mimi. Others in the French version included André Berley, Jacques Louvigny, Fernand Ledoux, H. Ramsey Hill, André Cheron, Jules Raucourt, Ferdinand Munier, Marcelle Corday, Barbara Leonard, Georges Renavent, Albert Polet, Mario Dominici and Olga Borget.COMMENT: The old The Guardsman plot — deduct five points for censorship emasculation — splendidly enacted by Chevalier and company, with Miss Oberon never looking more beautiful (soft focus photography by Barney McGill and costumes by Omar Kiam) or Miss Sothern more sexy. Director Roy Del Ruth's marvelous sense of comedy and expert timing makes the most of the witty screenplay. The songs are delightfully tuneful and include two fabulous production numbers — Gould won the Dance Direction Academy Award for 1935 — that out-Busby Berkeley. These musical numbers rejoice in sharp photography by Peverell Marley. Richard Day's magnificent sets are also a joy to behold and the sound recording could not be bettered today. The smooth film editing reflects Hollywood craftsmanship at its best. The film is a credit to all involved. Truly outstanding entertainment.

Richard Burin Folies Bergère de Paris (Roy Del Ruth, 1935) is a Lubitsch-like confection with numbers inspired by the kaleidoscopic choreography of Busby Berkeley. It's also among the best films I've caught this year. The story sees a vaudeville entertainer (Maurice Chevalier with his familiar persona) impersonate a baron (Chevalier again), leading to romantic complications for both. Ann Sothern is the entertainer's good time gal, with Merle Oberon the baron's flighty wife. It's witty and invigoratingly entertaining, with a fine performance by Chevalier in his dual role and a top supporting cast that includes Eric Blore, Robert Greig and Halliwell Hobbes. Despite the enjoyable plotting, the film's finest moments come through the slew of great numbers at both the beginning and the end of the film. The Singing a Happy Song finale, which won an Oscar for dance direction and features several hundred straw hats of varying sizes, is really something, but all the tunes are great: Valentine, Rhythm of the Rain, Au Revoir l'Amour and You Took the Words Right Out of My Mouth. This was Chevalier's last Hollywood musical until Gigi, 23 years later.

didi-5 A double role for Maurice Chevalier here, as a performer at the Folies Bergeres plus a rich Baron he impersonates as part of his act. When misfortune hits the Baron, the performer finds an off-stage assignment which can only lead to fun for him and the audience.Great musical numbers (especially Rhythm of the Rain and the finale with straw hats), strong casting (Ann Southern, Merle Oberon, and the hilarious Eric Blore), and a mixed identity plot which moves along with class and verve, 'Folies Bergere' is an extremely enjoyable example of Hollywood's 1930s flirtation with Europe.Chevalier's last US role for more than a decade is perfect for him, and the dual roles showcase his acting skills as well as providing lots of chances for that old Gallic charm.

MartinHafer In the early to mid 1930s, Maurice Chevalier made some exceptional American films such as LOVE ME TONIGHT and THE MERRY WIDOW. While I usually am not a fan of Jeanette MacDonald films, his presence elevated them to great heights thanks to his on screen personality and lovely singing voice. While this film is fun and is well worth seeing, it is clearly several steps below these other films in quality--mostly because the script is a tad silly. The main idea is a giant cliché. The audience is supposed to believe that there are two men who are unrelated who look and talk exactly alike. While such an idea worked pretty well in THE PRINCE AND THE PAUPER and THE PRISONER OF ZENDA, here the writing wasn't good enough to enable many audience members to accept this idea--especially because the two are so exact that even a wife cannot tell the difference! If you can ignore the central idea as well as the film going on a bit too long and having too many Busby Berkeley-style dance numbers, you are left with a film that is still worth your time and is a little better than your standard time-passer.