Marketic It's no definitive masterpiece but it's damn close.

Lumsdal Good , But It Is Overrated By Some

TaryBiggBall It was OK. I don't see why everyone loves it so much. It wasn't very smart or deep or well-directed.

Kaydan Christian A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.

Smoreni Zmaj This film is just an excuse for several beautiful women to show their breasts. Its stupid trashy script, unconvincing and dull acting, boring direction, poor editing and cheap production made it probably the worst and sleaziest Dracula movie to date. If you decide to watch it because of boobs, I'll spare you the agony of watching whole damn thing. Just watch from 0.50.30 to 0.51.40. to see two female vampires sucking blood from the tits of the third and skip everything else.2/10

jacobjohntaylor1 This is a Dracula sequel. It is very scary. It has a great story line. It also has great acting. It it has great special effects. This is one of the scariest movies ever made. 5.3 is underrating this awesome movie. This movie is a must see. I give 7 out of 10. For being one of the scariest movies of all time. Paul Naschy was a great actor. He is very scary in this movie. Rosanna Yanni is a great actress. Javier Aguirre is a great film maker. Dracula (March 1931) is better. Dracula (1992) is also better. Nosferatu (1922) is also better. Dracula (April 1931) is also better. But still this is a great movie. See it. Dracula (1958) is also better. But still this is a very scary movie.

Woodyanders 1870. A quintet of wayward travelers -- one jerky guy and four hottie ladies -- wreck their stagecoach in the middle of nowhere and seek refuge in the opulent castle of Dr. Marlow (glum, stocky, plain-looking Spanish horror icon Paul Naschy, who's miscast, but not half bad in the part), who turns out to be none other than Count Dracula. Dracula develops a special interest in Karen (lovely, charming brunette Haydee Politoff), a sweet and chaste virgin with pure blood Dracula needs to resurrect his long dormant daughter. Javier Aquirre's bluntly effective direction may lack grace and subtlety, but it does the crudely pleasing trick just the same: there's plenty of nicely creepy'n'misty atmosphere, cruddy dubbing, gorgeously voluptuous actresses who happily disrobe with satisfying frequency (Rossana Yanni, Mirta Miller and Ingrid Garbo are all absolutely ravishing as deadly, yet enticing bloodsucker babes who attack their victims with ferociously uninhibited abandon), lurid, ratty photography, a suitably abundant amount of sleazily graphic sex and violence, a few endearingly hokey cheap scares (a black cat jumps out from behind a door), a spooky ooga-booga score, and a hypnotically slow pace. Granted, this flick sure ain't no work of exceptional sophisticated art, but it still hits the scuzzy spot as a perfectly trashy serving of Eurojunk horror fun.

Aaron C. Schepler DRACULA'S GREAT LOVE (1972) ** ½ Paul Naschy, Haydée Politoff, Rosanna Yanni, Ingrid Garbo. Four women and a man wreck their stagecoach and must take refuge in a nearby castle. Unfortunately for the travelers, the castle's owner, Dr. Wendell Marlow (Paul Naschy), turns out to be none other than Count Dracula. After Dracula falls in love with one of the women, she must decide whether to live eternally as Dracula's bride or reject him and continue to live as a mortal. Her not-so-surprising choice leads to a strange and surprising ending. Like a lot of '70s European horror movies, the film suffers from slow pacing and a somewhat muddled plot. But there's lots of gothic atmosphere and a few creepy moments here and there to keep things interesting. Worth a look.