Code 46

2004 "How do you solve a crime when the last thing you want to know is the truth?"
6.1| 1h33m| R| en
Details

In a dystopian future, insurance fraud investigator William Gold arrives in Shanghai to investigate a forgery ring for "papelles", futuristic passports that record people's identities and genetics. Gold falls for Maria Gonzalez, the woman in charge of the forgeries. After a passionate affair, Gold returns home, having named a coworker as the culprit. But when one of Gonzalez's customers is found dead, Gold is sent back to Shanghai to complete the investigation.

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

Cubussoli Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!
BallWubba Wow! What a bizarre film! Unfortunately the few funny moments there were were quite overshadowed by it's completely weird and random vibe throughout.
Numerootno A story that's too fascinating to pass by...
Philippa All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.
zeppelin-fest In the secured dark of a soon to be closed down theater, we found this rare moment of in-between time. The camera painted our salty mood in light colours. The cast absorbed our trembling worries in fast pace. We were about to lose cinematic time. Still, this piece offered no reason to why we traded our seats so readily. The heroine is not yours. She stays out of reach. Some will complain and as soon as they do you will cherish her even more. The less they comprehend her actions, the more you will fall for her. But be aware of her heart which is divided in seemingly small compartments. She feeds the lonely and takes out the suicidal. She could be the harvester of every scene. She embodies the illusion of a combat without opponents. Her body swings in each direction. She is the engine of every moving image. The hero is far easier to digest. Almost as pale as the city he seems defeated. As a result you will swallow each and every word. Luckily, this story is not about words. Between the holes of architectural voids and fast tracks of epic-free sound something strange occurs: for a fleeting moment tragedy is caught lying. Sublime tastes sweeter when you stir in beauty. This is the formula they try to feed you. Delicious but restless. Every angle is shot with culinary knowledge. Only the last track leaves you hanging: the final pop piece falls short. Imperfection always strikes when art is planned. We sighed without regret. When the lights came back, we were quite happy. We were content to leave before the building was taken down. Behind us they closed the premises and declared our state cinema-free. Reflecting on this peculiar circumstances, I believe we watched in memory of our past while dreaming a wonder.
markandkarenfitz Few movies manage to convey, between the "lovers", real elemental love. This one does within the premise of a doomed relationship in a futuristic love-antithetical world. There is a reason for this depth of love, which is both pivotal to the plot and to the legitimacy of the emotions felt by the characters. Maybe it is just the superb gifts of Samantha Morton. She is impossible not to love in this film and most of her others. There is a love scene of remarkable power; accomplished with single prolonged head shot.I am at a loss to say more about this film. It is really very simple in terms of plot; though the plot is ingenious. The plot serves to underscore the love between these characters; period. This movie is greatness.
Joseph Sylvers There should be a genre of film dedicated to watching Samantha Morton dance around in neon lights at nightclubs. A good chunk of "Morvern Callar" was dedicated to just that, and really it's the kind of "special effect" I could watch for hours on end. Roland Emmerich could do a "They Short Horses Don't They?" remake where she has to keep dancing or else the world explodes, and every time she takes a water break, another continent can sink into the ocean, he could even purchase the name from Richard Linklater's documentary about Speed Levitch, and call it "Shiva's Dance Floor". Such is the allure of the only S & M that interests me on screen today, which at one point does involves some bondage, but I swear it's the most purely romantic, almost metaphysical, bondage ever.Aside from my obvious personal gushing, I have no problem calling Code 46 one the best science fiction of the films of the decade. Code 46 is about a relationship that defies laws, languages, and borders both genetic and national. Where "Babel" saw separation, Code 46 sees the potential for new tangential encounters, even in an over-regulated world where everything is kept in it's place and monitored (many times the camera becomes Big Brother POV of leering security cameras, creating true paranoia by not showing us Orwell's rat-men hunched over endless observation screens, just camera's recording indifferently anything and everything).The planet seems to be sectioned into two kinds of area and two kinds of people; those who have health insurance and those who don't. This insurance is often just called, "Coverage" (don't leave home without it). The Code 46 itself, we are told in the opening credits, is a law which forbids genetically similar couples from reproducing. "Everyone is genetic family" the titles say, and the first rule of genetics after all is to spread the genes around to increase variation. Reproducing with more genetically similar people increases the chance of preserving the same "bad" genes, inherited diseases, deficiencies, etc. Apparently, these genetic quirks are enough not only to be deemed uninsurable, but to cause mandatory termination of any resultant pregnancy and for repeat offenders other more serious measures. Those without insurance cannot travel from one country or even city to another. There is an "Outside" largely in the Middle East, where these new laws are not applicable, and the corporations less sway. Language has now become a more pronounced multi-lingual affair than it is today, where all citizens speak a Pidgin dialect of mostly English but also Spanish, French, Arabic, Italian, Farsi and Mandarin.This new language is an especially clever creation, in relation to the post-modern melancholy of films like Babel (which I liked) and Shijie (which I am not such a big fan of). In Code 46 the world becomes a global village, and like a village its regulations are tighter, stricter, and more interested in the collective than the individual. Many sci-fi films play this game of good individual vs. bad group-think, and there is nothing new about that, but Code 46 has no bad guys, outside of its main two characters, who betray each other in the most romantic of ways. Its essentially a tale of romance gone sour, told in a world less futuristic than it is "more modern", a soft sci-fi world cloned in a pitri dish from a fragment of this very decade and moment in history.Perhaps this split between the quirky Wong Kar Wai-ish romance at the beginning and the Oedipal abstraction of the end, seems too distracting and unnatural after first viewing, and admittedly it is jarring, but even though the film expands its sci-fi universe and by default the stories internal logic with an almost reckless abruptness, it ends up capturing an emotional logic that's even more effective. Emotions are abstract things, and what to me feels right might to another smack of bullshit, which is why I try to refrain (sometimes) from talking about how movies "feel", but forgetting for a second the implication that Robbins is looking for a mother/savior surrogate to save him from his humdrum dystopian life (ala Terry Gilliam's "Brazil"), the movie is about a couple who have a one night stand, resulting in unexpected sexual consequences (something besides incest, a subject more ticklish in fact, and much closer to real life) who take a romantic risk to have one moment together in impossible and doomed-from-the start conditions. Why doesn't Robbin's stop her from using the phone, for example?Memories are stored, erased, and reformed throughout the film with a shocking casualness (which lesser films would build an entire plot around), and I say shocking because if memories can be manipulated by government/corporate groups, it would be a dystopia more horrifying than anything in Orwell. You can't rebel if you can't remember what you were angry about. More interesting remembering is used as a form of punishment to those who would rather forget, which as we see in the film, is an even crueler fate.Basically the small details of Code 46 could amount to entire film franchises, but thankfully that's not what Winterbottom is interested in. It's a simple story about a complex world, both strange and sincere, and strange again. As a modern rendition of an ancient Greek classic, updated with much of "Until The End Of The World's" romantic globe spanning cyberpunk ambitions, and what Duncan Jone's called the "I-pod chic" of Soderberg's "Solaris", Code 46 is full of the kind of surprises, ideas, sounds, styles, and images I go the movies for. Sad to think I ignored this when it was first released as it could have only been improved on the big screen. I never thought any film could end with a Coldplay song and evoke anything in me but utter contempt, but God help me I was moved, and Morton wasn't even dancing at the time.
odo5435 I really wanted to like this film; and for the most part it fulfilled my expectations. The acting was above par as was the cinematography. Placed in a highly plausible near-future setting, the scenario of genetic violations had promise. The film had the potential to be one of the sci-fi greats.But I finished watching this film feeling that something was missing and it took me a while to put my finger on it.I believe the movie was let down by writing and/or direction that took too long to get to its main plot. Which would not have been a problem had it not failed to reward me for maintaining my interest along the way. Not that the film was slow, there were enough sci-fi near-future tit-bits for this buff (language, sets, plot, etc.), but I couldn't keep from thinking to myself "When are we going to get to the point?".Once there, somewhere about halfway through, the story picked up and we had a highly watchable futuristic flick.More attention to the script and direction, especially in the exposition, might have lifted the film from run-of-the-mill and turned it into a classic.My vote - Act 1 = 5, Act 2 = 9