Intcatinfo A Masterpiece!

FuzzyTagz If the ambition is to provide two hours of instantly forgettable, popcorn-munching escapism, it succeeds.

Numerootno A story that's too fascinating to pass by...

Scarlet The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

Eric Stevenson For a lot of bad movies, you can simply say to yourself that the person making them is probably a wonderful person in real life. Not with Boll. He actually physically attacks his critics and once backed out from a fight because the critic was a good boxer. I know little about boxing, but could try my hand at him. This is another one of his awful movies. They say there's no good direct to video movies, especially when the original film was terrible to begin with. This manages to even worse than the original as it repeats the mistakes and actually adds some new ones.So this movie takes place in the Old West and it's pretty easy to say that this is the worst Western I've seen in my entire life. Was this something from the BloodRayne games? I don't know and I don't care. It's awful no matter how you look at. We get to see the same idiotic slow motion scenes over and over. After the first ten times, it really becomes aggravating. He does this same thing again when a woman has sex with a guy after meeting him for a minute or so. A lot of this movie is filmed in the dark and it's just ugly to look at. This isn't your "Alone In The Dark" movie, Uwe.This film is also just plain mean spirited. There are actually scenes where children are being bitten and have their blood sucked out. There's a scene where half a dozen of them are about to be hanged at the same time. The scene where the guy cuts himself so Rayne can drink his blood isn't very pleasant either. There's one character who's a priest that talks about how God is sending people to Hell and hates gays. Guess what? He's actually a good guy! There's this obnoxious fat reporter who keeps appearing too. It looks like he's going to die a few times, but he unfortunately lives. 1/2*

Kritorian While i enjoyed the first Bloodrayne i think this sequel falls through completely. Every flaw of the first one is repeated here and made worse.Every bit of dialogue seems "out of sync" with what the movie is supposed to be. It simply takes away any chance of building intensity. The script is thinner than the paper it was written on. Cinematography is absolute crap, i'm guessing it suffers from low budget but definitely also from lack of vision. It does seem to want to recreate the feeling from certain old Sergio Leone western classics but fails so miserably at that and to the point where i can understand if some individuals would take offense. Throughout the movie every sequence is so slow paced it feels like the movie is made in slow motion. A proper director's cut would last 30 minutes at best.Strangely i feel that the score actually works. It's like its supposed to be even if the movie isn't.Most of the acting is poor but i think it's mainly due to bad script and bad dialogue. No actor in the world would be able to make a difference here. Unlike others i find the Billy the Kid character to work out fine, in fact both him and his crew manages to be nasty and unlikable like they should be. I find it hard to say much about Natassia Malthe because the script really doesn't produce sequences where she or anyone else would be allowed to shine much. There are a few scenes where she shows she could probably do it if she had something to work with.All in all not THE worst movie i've ever seen - but it comes close.

Flak_Magnet Unlike the first Bloodrayne, this direct-to-video sequel fails to deliver laughs as an unintentional comedy. I think we got one good chuckle out of it, but spent the majority of the time rolling our eyes and counting the minutes. As a plus, I think this is one of the worst Westerns I've ever seen and its also one of the lamest vampire movies. Unfortunately, though, its just too lame and unfunny to be worth most peoples' time. Expect to see the juvenility and incoherence that defines a Uwe Boll project, but also a drab story that limps along with the help of tired clichés. It isn't really campy; it just sucks. You can skip this one; its totally forgettable. ---|--- Reviews by Flak Magnet

harpy After watching the first movie in this installment, I thought to myself "well isn't this the worst movie I've ever seen." So why would I then watch the second movie? I thought it wasn't possible for a movie to get any worse...I was wrong, dead wrong. This has officially become the worst movie, no worst visual media presentation I have ever in my life seen. The acting was even worse than the first movie, the plot senseless. It has become the biggest waste of my life thus far. Seriously, why would you set a vampire movie in the old wild west? WHY? And truly...why make such a weak and pathetic heroine, with no idea as to strategy or how to save lives. This film was so bad, I'm considering recommending it to everyone I know just so I can inflict the pain that I had to suffer onto them. It really is that bad.