FeistyUpper If you don't like this, we can't be friends.

Moustroll Good movie but grossly overrated

ThedevilChoose When a movie has you begging for it to end not even half way through it's pure crap. We've all seen this movie and this characters millions of times, nothing new in it. Don't waste your time.

Geraldine The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

TheLittleSongbird But at the same time I didn't find Blood of Beasts a good movie. It is far better than the 2010 Beauty and the Beast also directed by David Lister though. Blood of Beasts' flaws come from some hilariously fake wigs, costumes that are not very authentic, the substandard effects especially the fires and the man in a prosthetic suit for the Beast, stilted dialogue and some rather forced acting from William Gregory Lee. On the other hand, I did like the fantasy-adventure nature of the sets, the photography and editing are above average and the score was cool with some beautiful and atmospheric themes. The story may strike you as standard, but it didn't feel predictable, it held my attention and unlike Lister's later Beauty and the Beast film the romance was somewhat believable. The acting is also not too bad, Jane March exudes beauty and is commanding also. Overall, not good or bad, more average to me. 5/10 Bethany Cox

purpleducktwo Once again I feel like odd man out, i read all the comments and wonder at all the would-be movie critics, with all the harsh comments, I cant help but wonder why there are not more people before the cameras for all their seeming knowledge of the acting profession and directors abilities. For myself, once again I just enjoyed the movie for its entertainment factor, and Jane March is still one of my favorites, my only disappointment was her death near the end, but thats just me, all I can say is to those who had such harsh feelings toward s the movie, why did you watch it all the way thru, then waste your time vomiting your comments in these columns? If you don't like a movie don't watch it, May I always enjoy what I watch and watch what I enjoy, tincancpo.....

Kate Weston ***********May contain Spoilers*********** Okay. I have to say it was a good movie. Okay a really rushed and sometimes stupid. The men in the movie, to make it a little more realistic could have grown beards, since most Viking men believed beards represented they were men. The battle scenes were a bit unrealistic at parts. William Gregory Lee and Justin Whalin suited the Viking parts, but William could've not forced his acting in some parts. The overall story is a Beauty and The Beast remake only in the Viking era. I liked it, but at some parts it does seem really forced. Most Dungeon & Dragons fans will like this movie.Hope this helps...

harbeau This movie is not great, by any stretch. It is the story of Beauty and the Beast retold from a vaguely new perspective.Having said that, its not as bad as it first appears. Sure, the costumes suck...it is obvious that this is a film with a very low budget.But the acting is decent, and there were even a few that stood out. The writing is decent. And the directing was obviously quite good. He/she did quite a bit with very little money spent. Even the production was decent. Not spectacular, by any means. But certainly could have been worse.So, does it top my A list? Not a chance. But if you are looking for a movie that is a pleasant diversion, this may be the ticket.