Twilightfa Watch something else. There are very few redeeming qualities to this film.

Bluebell Alcock Ok... Let's be honest. It cannot be the best movie but is quite enjoyable. The movie has the potential to develop a great plot for future movies

Rosie Searle It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.

Cristal The movie really just wants to entertain people.

DCfan I honestly think the main reason why I don't like this show is mainly due to it's art style and character designs. However the voice acting is pretty good (especially since I know Jason Spisak can voice little boys) apart from Rodney's voice because it just sounds terrible, I like Richard Steven Horvitz as a voice actor but his Squirrel boy is just a miscast. They should have gone with someone like Josh Keaton, Dee Bradley Baker, Johnny Yong Bosch (even if he would have been stuck in anime at this time), Jason Marsden or even David Kaufman. I have to admit though the intro is good but the designs of the show (even if its by the same person who made Duckman) just put it down.

GravityLoudHouseLover1 Squirrel Boy was a show about a Squirrel named Rodney and his owner Andy and their misadventures. The Show Ran on from May 27, 2006 - September 27, 2007 on Cartoon Network. I like this show when I was 10 to 11 years old. However Cartoon Network hasn't shown it Since March 2009 and it doesn't have a home video release for this show. Anyway the show ran for 2 Seasons & 26 Episodes in Total. The Voice acting was Pretty Good I Mean you got Richard Steven Horvitz as Rodney J Squirrel and Pamela S. Aldon as Andy Johnson and Kurtwood Smith as Mr. Bob Johnson and Nancy Sullivan as Mrs. Lucille Johnson. Anyway Squirrel Boy was okay show not as good as FHIF. I Give Squirrel a 6 out 10 stars for being Decent. I'm GravityFalls2 have nice day. BYE.

tommypezmaster this show is basically another CatDog rip off. this time with political icons pasted on as the characters. unlike other Rocko's Modern Life successors such as Lil' Bush and Pucca this show is not in the least bit funny. Lil' Bush and Pucca are always insulted for "not having good storytelling elements" but at least they're funny if the viewer enjoys crude and over the line humor. Squirrel Boy just isn't funny at all, no matter what kind of humor the viewer enjoys. i realize that comedy doesn't always have to make since to be funny, but i believe that when a parody of a pop culture(or in this case CatDog-like figure) is made it should at least make some since. i'll admit the evil Kyle thing is somewhat ugly, but it really doesn't make any since at all. this show would fair much better if it didn't reference any CatDog characters and instead had unoriginal characters that haven't been joked to death. this leads to my next point, the jokes are all overused. i watched like 8 episodes so far and I've yet to hear any original material. again, it seems a writer and artist teamed up, the writer recycled CatDog jokes and scripts from other animated sitcoms and the artist attemped a Rocko's Modern Life/Pucca merger with CatDog-like figures.I really tried watching this show. My little Brotherloves this show so I've seen a couple of episodes. This brings me to this conclusion, This show is crap. No seriously, this is another mockery to all animated shows from Cartoon Network. The characters and stories in this show is pitiful. All the characters are stiffs. Their dialouge is stupid. Their jokes are corny and unfunny(even though they try so hard to be). There's nothing that stands out with any of the characters. The stories are badly written. the storyline is stupid. A Squrriel & his owner dose stupid stuff to become popural. It's another real bad Family Guy clone.And it really wouldn't be much of a squrriel power cartoon without stupid music, corny plans, and stupid way in getting into trouble.I know recently, there has been a trend of 'Squrriel Power' cartoons, but this is just sorry. It tries to be a Yakkity Yak clone, but fails at it badly. Seriously, this show is just sucks. If your looking for some idiot brain power, watch Cormartie High School, Mr. Meaty, and dare I say it, Coconut Fred's Fruit Salad Inland.The only redeeming quality for this show is the decent animation. But it doesn't save it for being an extremely bad show.So let's see if I covered everything; Bad stories, pitiful characters, corny voice acting, retarded humor, stupid piece of Cartoon Network S**T, and bad poses. Yep, your everyday generic Juvenal Dequent cartoon.

Papagatero I wondered where I had seen this stomach-churning style of art-house character design before, so I looked up the show's creator, Everett Peck. Sure enough, he was also the creator of Duckman, a really raunchy and only slightly uglier comedy cartoon for adults. While the grotesque style certainly worked well with a show as bizarre and often disturbing as Duckman, it isn't as effective on a show aimed at kids. At least the animation is smoother and up-to-date, but that scarcely saves it from its own inherently ugly art-house style. Duckman was able to pull it off due to the deranged nature of the show, but it just doesn't hold up in "Squirrel Boy."The voice acting is good, but therein lies another downfall; these are voices most cartoon-watchers have heard a LOT and can connect to famous characters from better cartoons. The two lead voice actors pull out their tried-and-true voices for this show. Pamela Adlon, the voice of "Andy" on this show, provides a voice that's quickly identified as the same voice used for Bobby Hill (King of the Hill), Otto (Time Squad), Milo (The Oblongs), and Spinelli (Recess), just to name a few. Richard Horvitz, the voice of "Rodney J. Squirrel," also provides a familiar voice. The voice of Rodney isn't that much different from other famous characters played by Horvitz, such as Billy (The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy), ZIM (Invader ZIM), Dagget (The Angry Beavers), and Kanchome (Zatch Bell, an anime currently shown a LOT on Cartoon Network). True, they're great voice actors, but we've heard these voices before, and have come to identify them with other characters (or likely the actor themselves when the voice is overused enough). It was a bad casting decision to imbue the two main characters on a brand new show with voices that are far from new or unique. A good character has a unique look and voice; that's the kind of character that kids will remember.So, the character design style of the show share's Duckman's art-house ugliness (but lacks the twisted humor to go with it), and the two characters around whom the entire show revolves have overused voices. What's the show itself like? How's the writing, the plot? Well, unfortunately, there's no saving grace in the show's writing. The story and gags aren't anything to get excited about, though not terrible, they pale in comparison to some of the other shows on Cartoon Network that are overflowing with charismatic writing. Basically the show's about a boy, Andy, and his squirrel friend/pet, Rodney. Rodney is the driving force of the show, always imposing his will upon Andy and getting the two of them into trouble. The humor is pretty basic and enough to get a laugh or two from kids, but there aren't any cleverly inserted jokes that'll have adults cracking up (unlike "Billy and Mandy" for example). Rodney stands out as one of the only truly influential characters on the show, and possibly the only interesting one, with everything essentially revolving around and hinging upon the actions of this character. Aside from the strength of Rodney's character, the other characters on the show are considerably weak. One character does not a series make.It might not be fair to judge this show so harshly based on the merits of Cartoon Network's other shows; it might actually be "decent" if it didn't have other shows of higher quality to measure up to. But, this IS a Cartoon Network-distributed show, and thus, it SHOULD measure up to the quality viewers have come to expect from the network. "Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends," "The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy," and "Ed, Edd, & Eddy" are all shows that radiate with originality, first-rate writing, and great voice acting (with voices that are, for the most part, unique to those characters). Those are shows that appeal to all ages, are visually appealing, with extremely effective characters: all of those qualities are lacking in "Squirrel Boy." Though it's not the first of Cartoon Network's new shows to disappoint those who've come to expect high quality original shows from the network, it still comes as a disappointment to be handed another lemon. Just because a show is aimed at children is no excuse for mediocrity... not for the same network that continues to produce exceptional cartoons like those mentioned above.