FeistyUpper If you don't like this, we can't be friends.

Stoutor It's not great by any means, but it's a pretty good movie that didn't leave me filled with regret for investing time in it.

Kaydan Christian A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.

Cheryl A clunky actioner with a handful of cool moments.

Leofwine_draca The success of the original WILD THINGS (a great little film, by the way, and well worth tracking down) led producers to demanding a second helping of the pie, so along comes this sequel (and a further two down the line, so somebody somewhere must like them). Sadly, WILD THINGS 2 turns out to be a lukewarm retread of the original, down to using almost exactly the same plot except with the character names changed.Unfortunately, the thing that helped WILD THINGS to achieve its success was the novelty: it stands alone as a uniquely thrilling compendium of twists upon twists, manipulating the story constantly to keep the viewer guessing. We've already seen and dealt with all that by the time of WILD THINGS 2, and it all feels very passé as a result.It doesn't help that this straight-to-video outing lacks any decent cast members (and low rent action star Linden Ashby playing a cop doesn't count) and as a result the acting is pretty poor. I didn't care about what happened to any of those involved, and it all felt very stale and predictable. The characters are drab and the presence of not one, not two, but three scriptwriters should be warning enough: stick with the original!

vineeth002 I watched the movie last month. It's an excellent movie with suspense and surprise at every moment. The strarring of my favourite actress Susan wards is so amazing (Besides she's beautiful too). The director of the movie needs an equal appreciation. I hope more sequel of wild things will be made.Another thing is its back ground music. The back ground music that is heard in the beginning of the movie and at the end. So pretty......... The ending is also nice. The end reveals how the robbery is planned.. So very bad for those who leave the chair upon seeing the credits. They miss the 'important part'.

insomniac_rod Susan Ward shines in this mediocre direct to video soft-core sex flick. While the original "Wild Things" has it's moments of thrilling scenes and a memorable plot twist, this sequel has only sex and hot women running around in skimpy outfits trying to figure out some stuff.I won't get into detail because believe me, this one does not deserves your time or your money.Susan Ward and a threesome scene (better than the one from the original!!) are the highlights. So my recommendation is: watch this on late cable and wait for the sex scenes to happen.This movie is a total robbery and a poor excuse for nudity.

preppy-3 Rich high school girl Britney Harvers (Susan Ward) has a dead mother she misses and a lousy stepfather who hates her. He dies in a plane crash and she's left all his millions. But cruel, obnoxious school girl Maya King (Leila Arcieri) claims Britney's stepfather was HER father and she deserves all the money...Pointless "sequel" to "Wild Things". It's basically the same exact plot with a few (minor) twists and turns....just done with a bad cast and a terrible script. If you've seen the first you don't need to see this--you already have. It even copies the infamous threesome sex scene from the original! (Trust me--the original is better). This is just made to show young, attractive women in bikinis--wet ones preferably.I'm giving this a 2 because it has some good points. Everybody looks good (Ward and Arceri are beautiful and Joe Michael Burke has a nice body); the settings themselves are lush; there's one good performance by Isiah Washington and a nice score. But you're constantly one step ahead of this movie and it gets annoying. See the original--you'll be much better off.