AnhartLinkin This story has more twists and turns than a second-rate soap opera.

Senteur As somebody who had not heard any of this before, it became a curious phenomenon to sit and watch a film and slowly have the realities begin to click into place.

SanEat A film with more than the usual spoiler issues. Talking about it in any detail feels akin to handing you a gift-wrapped present and saying, "I hope you like it -- It's a thriller about a diabolical secret experiment."

Erica Derrick By the time the dramatic fireworks start popping off, each one feels earned.

Ervin Zarka I did just 1 star rating coz i couldn't make it minus 10 stars. I was curious to see if this director has new facts about the hottest subject in the world. I am so dissapointed! After 1 hour watching this Steven talking and talking and talking and also crying an dbeing dramatic for no reason, i couldnt continue further. It was too much that this kind of visual production to go through my mind. It looked like he wanted to show off that he knew facts and he could talk and that he could be interesting but he didn't let the documentary to tell itself. He just collected some pieces of videos from the past, he got some half interviews from some "high personality" people and then h ejoined them. He didnt even edited well. I must say it is the most amateur video editing i ever seen. It is over all, the most useless "documentary" in the world. In 2017 this kind of video production is a shame!

mcw2112-715-105029 The first thing I feel compelled to point out is Greer made a 'big deal' point about Marilyn Monroe and her connection to the Kennedy's, along with her threat to divulge some secrets to Dorothy Kilgallen - and then showed us a few seconds of the lovely Arlene Francis, Ms. Kilgallen's co-panelist on "What's My Line?" When you're trying to persuade people to believe the incredible, you might want to have someone fact-check you on everything to maintain some semblance of integrity. This may seem like a small point to some younger folks, but Ms Kilgallen was very, very famous in her time (late 40's-mid 60's). If they made such a glaring mistake about that, what else did they just throw out there? There's also the blatant partisan Republicans bad/Democrats good garbage that has no place in a UFO documentary. Greer makes it clear that neither presidents nor members of congress, on either side, have this all-important 'need to know', so why do they only show us Republicans as the orchestraters of all things secret? All in all, it was more of the same from Steven Greer and in the final analysis, we still only know what we know and we don't know what we don't know.

Al Lehman If you think this is just another "ancient astronauts" kind of thing, think again. This is an excellent show, with current living experts discussing and describing recent (since the 1950's) events. The expert testimony is from people who were there. I hope this becomes a huge phenomenon and stirs action to that which has been hidden. Dr. Greer is thorough, smart, and low key. It also gives thoughts for much discussion. It even lists it's proofs and sources. Do a search on Sirious/Unacknowledged for what appears to be it's official site with said references.

trnjamesbond This film starts out as a very believable film, with proof and evidence galore then about an hour into the film it transitions from believable to out right ridiculous. From connecting dots to Marilyn Monroe's involvement in aliens and JFK and all that nonsense with the main storyteller to start talking about shadow people in one scene he talks about when they told him that a bullet has your name on it and so forth. It always seems to be in these sorts of films that it comes down to the men in black to "threaten the family" or "threaten the friend" or "threaten the co-worker" type of storytelling to make their story appear to be the absolute truth. But in reality this is just one person talking in front of a camera. With this being said, these people telling their personal stories and encounters sound a bit like science fiction not science fact. There are multiple era's of clips all slung together like they were all shot in 2017 the release year of this film. But that's the part that people are not seeing, clips are taken from interviews from many different decades, you can tell by the way the screen is stretched to make it look widescreen, also some interviews you could tell they were transferred from analogue to digital. This is very sloppy editing and quite frankly makes this film feel more like the television broadcast called Alien Autopsy starring Jonathan Frakes, we all know what became of that idiocy. I for one can't believe one word of what this person is telling the audience. Now don't get me wrong I do believe in aliens or just people existing on other planets or other realms but this film is just nonsense and they try to connect aliens to everyone that seems to have made a mark in the history of history especially the Marilyn Monroe portion of the film. Seriously a drug overdose now it's because of aliens and knowing they exist? Come on people I am not this stupid or naive about any of this information.