GrimPrecise I'll tell you why so serious

Afouotos Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

AshUnow This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

Jenni Devyn Worth seeing just to witness how winsome it is.

Platypuschow I tend not to like the "Ghosty" films, though I'm a horror fanatic I find this sub genre highly clichéd and very boring. Once you've seen one you tend to have seen them all.For this reason I went into The Visitant with no expectations so was pleasantly surprised to see that this is actually a competently made horror title with a few good ideas under it's belt.It's not going to win any awards for originality but I got what I wanted out of it regardless, entertainment.With a decent lead, an interesting story and less of the usual genres tropes I have to say this is one of the better "Ghosty" films I've ever seen.The Good: Solid lead Some good ideas Neat double bluff twist The Bad:You'll have seen most of it before Things I Learnt From This Movie:Ghost themed films can be entertaining, who knew!?

rosecalifornia Like most people, when I watch films I want to see something interesting and entertaining....neither of which is found here.You can read the review for the background of what the film is about. However, the nuts and bolts - just are not in this film. The acting is forced, not natural. The script is incredibly poorly written. The beginning is actually worse than a high school play or script. This film spells out everything surrounding the world of the "fortune teller" within about two minutes, it is actually laughable - and if this were done in school, the student would receive an F.As the story attempts to unfold it is just more and more of a mis-mash attempt at fear using loud sounds, music and screams at varying points. There are strange points in the film where they use the annoying shaky-cam, but then again flip to the level cam - it doesn't make sense....even taking into consideration the script at the point.You see a "fortune teller" living in a multi-million dollar decked out home (they make $20 per reading prior to taxes), it would be more believable if she were in a small home. There is more attached to this point of the film, but I don't want to give away any information in that regard - but it is not believable in the least.Hopefully - someone in Hollywood will give backing/funding to one of the many talented people with film ideas that are pounding on doors.....but it hasn't happened yet.

loomis78-815-989034 Samantha (Feren) works as a fortune teller at the local amusement park. She doesn't really believe in the supernatural but she needs the job since she was widowed a year ago when her husband died in a freak car wreck. An after-hours client named Lee (Glaner) shows up and demands her help. Lee has been plagued by a demon that she can't shake. Samantha goes through the motions and tells the spirit to leave Lee alone. Samantha goes home and the suspect spirit has attached itself to her and her big house starts playing supernatural tricks on her. Samantha's best friend Maya (Wiu) consults with her by telephone and web-cam. Maya is a supernatural expert and the one who talked Samantha into being a fortune teller. As the night progresses Samantha becomes more terrified until she gets the idea that it could be her dead husband trying to communicate with her. Will she open herself up to the spirit? And is it her husband or something more evil lurking? This tightly made independent film claims to be based on actual events. Who knows, but Director Jon Binkowski makes the most out of a very small cast and limited locations with a strong production and a flair for delivering some spooky moments. Using lighting and very subtle digital effects at just the right time, Binkowski raises some goose bumps and keeps the viewer engaged. A great moment happens when Samantha just misses seeing a charging spirit on the screen of her TV she just turned off. An above average musical score from Stephen O'Connor helps the overall effectiveness of the film. Written by Binkowski and Stephen DeWoody, The Visitant's biggest flaw comes from the two characters having a constant conversation to further the plot. More characters would have helped break this up a bit. It didn't help having the two characters arguing over the validity of the paranormal which begins to wear on the audience as the movie goes on. The scares are well done, and at least this movie has some, even though more hardcore audiences might find it a bit on the light side without any blood or gore. Hey it isn't "Insidious" but it isn't trying to be either, it is a simple straight head haunting thriller with a chilling ending that may be predictable but still works.

myplane150 I have been watching and very much enjoying horror movies for a long time. In fact, I rarely get scared anymore. My nephew and girlfriend think I am weird because nothing gives me the heebie jeebies. So I love it when a movie gives me the chills. Last effective movie I saw was The Conjuring (see it!!!). Anyway, this movie actually gave me said chills on a couple of occasions. Not because it was really scary but because it was effectively creepy. The movie was well acted throughout and the story wasn't bad. I think most gave it a low score because it is kinda slow but, in horror, slow is good. Also, the ending could have been a bit less hokey. All in all though, not too shabby.