sanookdee
it's hard to know where to begin with this movie. I Saw Billy Jack in the theater as a teen. I found this sequel on youtube and watched it. I had to pause it regularly because it was so bad. it really has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. Unlike many bad movies that are so bad, they are good, this one is so bad it does not even have that quality. bad script, bad acting, bad directing, bad story line. it's to political to even be political. it's like one of those really horribly made Soviet propaganda movies from the 50's and 60's. so over the top. every character is cartoonish in nature. Usually I like past era films with a political statement but, this one rambles on and on and on. the best part of this movie is, it finally ended. worth watching if you are totally bored. it will get you off the couch to clean the bathroom grout. or, inspire you to do your own dental work on a toothache.
romanorum1
The original "Billy Jack" (1971) showed some promise and was so popular that it grossed nearly $33 million on a budget of only $800,000. Even though excessive violence was used to combat violence, folks eagerly awaited the sequel and lined up at theaters in 1974. The result was a major disappointment. "The Trial of Billy Jack" certainly began with hope, with its scenic vistas of Arizona's Monument Valley and the Elmer Bernstein score. But this overlong, three-hour flop takes an early exit and goes nowhere quickly. Virtually without plot, the movie jumps from one social issue to the next: cultural clashes, child abuse, crooked politicians, the establishment, hippies, the military, Vietnam, the police, etc. Jean Robert's sobs in her hospital bed, and begins to tell a long story to a young female reporter. So, almost everything that follows appears in flashback.The trial itself only occupies a short portion of this film. There were good reasons for Billy Jack's killing of Bernard Posner in "Billy Jack": after all the young man was a murderer and rapist. But the defense of Billy Jack (Tom Laughlin) seems inept; the lawyer does not ask about the circumstances. On the other side, the prosecution essentially asks Billy Jack about his philosophy of life. Then we get flashbacks about the Vietnamese War and accompanying atrocities. In the end, Billy Jack goes to prison for involuntary manslaughter and serves four years, so that Laughlin is off the screen for perhaps three-quarters of an hour. This screen time allows attention on Jean Roberts (Delores Taylor) and the progress of her Freedom School. Previously the students themselves renovated an old abandoned military academy in the desert. They worked hard and begged, borrowed, and scrounged for funds. They governed themselves by "love" (oh, oh). They learned and practiced about various topics, like meditation, body awareness, exercise, dance, band, music, arts/crafts, yoga athletics, math, and psychology. They discover an effective treatment for abused children (and even their abusers). When Jean hosts a child abuse conference, she reveals that the solution is love and patience. The hippies build a radio station and gain royalties by selling their recordings "door to door." They start a newspaper to expose right- wing corruption. Several long- haired geniuses even invent a lying machine! Yep, they can tell when a politician is lying, even on TV. The kids say that the FBI, CIA, and police are totally corrupt. When these young geniuses began to expose the top bigwigs of the country, the moguls begin to take notice. The masterminds claim that the Nixon White House and oil barons "manipulated" the entire 1973 energy crisis and engineered the Arab-Israeli War! Really? Esteemed journalists the world over missed this one. Actually the Arabs and Israelis detest each other and have been at odds for many decades, up to the present day! Anyway, the students seem to know so much that the barons apply pressure on the school. When they illegally tap the telephones, the kids outsmart them (again). Eventually the school's TV station gets wrecked. Damn Republicans! Given their dialogue, it is utterly impossible to believe that the kids are superlative masterminds, or even have learned very much. For they are as self-righteous and pompous as ever: with them there is no compromise. So when they attempt to work things out by themselves, they descend into chaos, and even scream at poor Jean! Meanwhile ignorant louts from town bully students, punch a girl, and burn the school bus. This becomes an excuse for a vengeful Billy Jack to take off his boots and socks before he lowers the hapkido boom. Oh, oh, someone is gonna get hurt! Billy Jack reprises his role when Blue Elk (Gus Greymountain) gets battered by rednecks for no obvious reason except that he's an Indian. Then he's inexplicably dragged amid a town dance, with the local judge in attendance. Folks could only stare; no one even tries to help. Billy Jack though takes over. Then another Posner (Riley Hill), also a jerk, dies trying to kill the hapkido master. The corrupt police also try to set up and kill Billy Jack, but he escapes. Meanwhile, the Indians continue to be gouged on the reservation and their lands shrink, assisted by their paid-off brothers. They too argue among themselves. Some starving Indians get ten days jail time for deer hunting out of season. A black woman who cannot keep up with furniture payments is dispossessed. A ski rescue (under clear skies!) is used to vilify a prejudiced doctor. There are so many plot points that come and go quickly. Fine editing would have helped immeasurably. Besides its extreme length and inept editing, the movie is weak in its pretentious dialog and political posturing. In addition, the hippies are amateur actors. They are also inferior guitarists and singers (Nice music department, Freedom School!). The pacing is torpid and several scenes take up too much screen time, like Billy Jack's spiritual vision to conquer his demons (while painted in red). Except for Teddy Kennedy (at Chappaquiddick) and the hippie rock thrower near the end, the left-wingers are good and do no wrong. The few good whites are those associated with the school, Sheriff Cole (Sparky Watt), and the founding fathers of Virginia, like Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe. The rest are bullies and racists. Republicans are wicked: Eisenhower, Nixon, and Ford are mentioned by name. In frustration, Jean eventually calls for a revolution on school TV. Did real life husband and wife Laughlin- Taylor really believe this stuff? The last part of the film imitates the 1970 strife at Kent State: National Guard vs. students. After that, Blue Elk says while holding a torch, "If this country must have another Civil War, then let it start here." Ugh!!! Then the surviving kids tell Jean that they are going to start their own schools everywhere. "With what?" one might add! Extremely disappointing!!
Uriah43
After serving his sentence for involuntary manslaughter, "Billy Jack" (Tom Laughlin) is released from prison and returns to the Freedom School on the Navajo Reservation. However, the residents of the nearby town still hold a great deal of animosity toward both him and the students at the school and the illegal harassment continues unabated. It gets so bad that both the students and Billy Jack retaliate in kind and this only aggravates the situation even worse. Now rather than reveal any more I will just say that this was a fairly long and dull movie which featured an incoherent plot, bad acting and equally awful music. That said, while I have no doubt there are some who either identify with this particular era in American history or idolize this motion picture, I honestly found it to be quite boring and very difficult to view to the very end. Again, it was long and dull. Because of that I recommend it only to fans of the series and have rated it accordingly. Below average.
daviddaphneredding
In this sequel to "Billy Jack", Tom Laughlin and Delores Taylor continue to strongly and clearly convey, via the motion-picture medium, that the situation with which this movie deals is extremely, again, controversial. After all, the movie deals with the matter of bigotry and injustice. It begs a big question. What can a person do within legal limits to stop harassment of minority groups when the law will not cooperate and defend these minority groups? Following, it may also beg the question concerning whether or not Billy Jack is a villain or hero, since the caring person has no mercy on the mean people who do the harassing and does not care what happens to such horrible people. I like this thought-provoking movie. I like it because of the subject matter, but I also like the aesthetic qualities: the west is, in its own way, beautiful. The acting is convincing as well. Whenever I think about the controversial subject matter, I never reach a conclusion, but because of this, the acting, and the beautiful scenery, I will always be glad I saw it.
