Karry Best movie of this year hands down!

Odelecol Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.

Keeley Coleman The thing I enjoyed most about the film is the fact that it doesn't shy away from being a super-sized-cliche;

Juana what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.

Platypuschow This fourth and final movie in the original "The Mummy" franchise picks up from where the last one ended but despite being made the very same year has recast our leading lady which is a damn shame.It tells the story of our mummy once against being brought back to seek out his reincarnated lost love. This time however after the events of the last film she is suffering from amnesia and every one in her life is in terrible danger.Oddly the quality of this franchise in regards to cinematography has been inconsistent and this is one of the worst. Combine that with some hammy performances and yet again the movie cannot rise above being distinctly average stuff.Despite all this the entire franchise has had a certain charm, but I think 4 movies were sufficient especially considering how similiar they all are.A fitting finale.The Good:Carries on the story nicelyThe Bad:Timelines of the series make no senseCinematography has dippedRecastingMuch of the plot is confusingThings I Learnt From This Movie:Everyone who wears a Fez is evilAmnesiacs are a great source of free labourI can't take a character seriously if they're wearing a safari hat!

jacobjohntaylor1 This is a really scary movie. This is scarier then The Mummy's hand. And that is not easy to do. This is also scarier then the The Mummy's tomb and that is not easy to do. This is also scarier then The Mummy's ghost and that is not easy to do. This movie has a great story line. It also has great acting. It also has great special effects. 5.6 is a good ratting. But this is such a great movie that 5.6 is underrating it. This is a 9. If this movie does not scary you no movie will. It is scarier then The Shining. And that is not easy to do. This is scarier then A Nightmare on elm street and that is not easy to do. This is scarier then Halloween and that is not easy to do.

Uriah43 At the end of the previous movie "The Mummy's Ghost" the mummy known as "Kharis" (Lon Chaney) carried the beautiful "Amina Mansouri" (Ramsay Ames) into the Louisiana swamp and while they were sinking into quicksand she had morphed into the "Princess Ananka". This movie essentially picks up where the previous movie ended with some workers for the "Southern Engineering Company" trying to drain the Louisiana swamp where Kharis and Ananka sank some 25 years earlier. While work is progressing two people from the "Scripps Museum", who go by the names of "Dr. James Halsey" (Dennis Moore) and "Dr. Ilzor Zandaab" (Peter Coe), come to see the owner of the company "Pat Walsh" (Addison Richards) to tell him that they want to dig up Kharis for their museum. Unfortunately, while they are talking the dead body of one of the workers is found near that site. Also found is a bandage which could have only come from Kharis. Not long after that Princess Ananka (now played by Virginia Christine) is also freed from her underground resting place and as she wanders in the swamp she gradually changes back into her old identity of Amina Mansouri. Naturally, Kharis wants her back and he will stop at nothing to get her. Anyway, rather than detail the rest of the movie and possibly ruin the film for those who haven't seen it I will just say that this is the 4th sequel to the original movie "The Mummy" which was filmed back in 1932. As such it follows the same standard plot which admittedly gets a bit old in subsequent re-tellings. And while there are a couple of twists thrown in which have a certain appeal the fact that this movie only lasted 62 minutes doesn't allow for any depth to the characters or the plot. That said, in my opinion this "paint-by-numbers" approach doesn't lend any quality to the movie and as a result I rate it as slightly below average.

AaronCapenBanner Lon Chaney Jr. returned for the last time as Kharis the living mummy, who is unearthed(along with his beloved Princess Ananka) from their swampy grave by builders excavating the area for re-development. Once again, a high priest(played by Peter Coe) and his native assistant(played by Martin Koslek) are after them as well, and want to return them to their native Egypt, but local Scripps Museum representatives have other ideas, leading to a final climax to the "saga"... Bizarre film is set 25 years after "Ghost", placing this in the year 1995!(Or so)Huh? It still looks like the 1940's to me! Even worse, the previous two pictures were set in Mapleton Massachusetts, now they are located in Louisiana! Huh? It makes no sense, and poor continuity only makes this tired, dated and redundant film worse.