The Mummy Resurrected

2014
1.8| 1h20m| NR| en
Details

A team of archaeologists discover an ancient mummy, unleashing a deadly curse from its eternal tomb.

Director

Producted By

Halcyon International Pictures

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Also starring Sarah Schreiber

Reviews

Karry Best movie of this year hands down!
BootDigest Such a frustrating disappointment
Micitype Pretty Good
Steineded How sad is this?
mlwitvliet This movie learns me that I'm one of the stupid ones that believes that a movie can't be that bad as they say it is. Fortunately i saw this movie in the internet so I just spend about 10 minutes to watch the movie and conclude "Wow it really IS that bad".The acting, the filming, the story line and the music is as cheap as it can get and if they told me it was a school project I would have believed it.I really can't understand where the $ 3.000.000,= is spend on certainly not if you think that Cult movie "the Evil dead" from 1981 is made with a budget of $350.000,= OK, this was in another era but still! They should have given the $ 3.000.000,= to me. I would have put a much better use to it.
climbingtiger957 more of my life wasted!i truly believe when they make these films there gonna come somewhere near making a spielberg classic!its just 100% absolute trash !probably up there with the worst b movies of all time.it didn't look to bad when it started ,that lasted about 30 seconds, from then on in it just follows a downhill trail until it arrives in a pile of crap.worst acting I've ever seen ,some sort of Egyptian hell hound with smoke shooting out of its eyes.I'm pretty sure the script was made up the day before when they went out and picked up some actors from the local boozer !sadly there were parts of the flick i missed ie when i fell into a coma or tried chewing my own leg off .seriously folks its a terrible,terrible ,pile of crap.
karennuilcoco First of the reason why I watched the movie, was because of the title and the cover picture. I remember when I first saw "The Mummy" (1999). I couldn't get enough of it. And I thought: Oh! Another Mummy movie! *-* I need to watch it! And when I watched it then I was like....What...?For my luck I watched it on the internet so I could skip most of the scenes. Thanks God we can do it. The be honest by good movies I am not doing this. First of all I didn't like the actors. They couldn't act! When I saw they act then I thought: Okay....Are we back in the early 2000's?? And second the storyline was just horrible...In the end I was like: THAT'S IT!? ARE YOU KIDDING ME!? I can't believe what I just did watch....The only thing what good about the movie was, were the effects. Those were well made.I would recommend you not to watch it. It is just waste of time....
drew-962-366474 I quite like 'bad' movies, but this contains none of those minor merits to even lift itself into that category. Its low budget, but for 750k dollars, really, it contains no real acting (a local drama group could do better), no real plot (really none, and no ending either), no atmosphere and nothing that would make you want to watch this, go play scrabble or trim your toe nails.... time better spent. The film title deliberately uses the same font and style from the altogether way better Mummy films (Brendan Fraser).... but that is it... special effects just make you yearn for an episode of Blakes Seven.... Seriously - don't bother.....