Lovesusti The Worst Film Ever

Brendon Jones It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.

Deanna There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.

Zlatica One of the worst ways to make a cult movie is to set out to make a cult movie.

Bana25 Coogan was excellent in this, the whole part with him and his daughter passing away was extremely well done and certainly jerked the heart strings, after watching this I read lots on his life, it was very sad to see his only real love was his daughter and after her nothing replaced her, and he lived a recluse much like Howard Hughes did in his high rise Penthouse, all his money when he died went to distant relatives who now live in his Penthouse rich without a worry in the world, and probably without knowing what went on there. Coogan is a good serious actor, I would like to see him in more things like this, he is a very versatile actor.

M MALIK i saw this film recently and it got me thinking about it for sometime after it was over that there are many ways to make money and one of them is this the sexy way many people have done that in the world including playboy magazine founder Hugh Hefner but not like this guy Paul Raymond did in UK through 60s & 80s he later became one of the richest men in the country this film highlights everything you need to know about the business he was in & his life.the plot:Paul Raymond is a entrepreneur who looks back at his life of how he created a new empire in UK by creating strip joints,soft-core magazines & many more to be the ultimate king of entertainment in UK also known as king of Soho & sophistication, & his relationship with his daughter Debbie & family membersthe cast:Anna Freil,Imogen Poots are two ladies to lookout for but one man has clearly stole the show he is Steve Coogan as his portrayal of Paul Raymond was spot on also funny at some places specially when he mimic Sean Connery James bond shaken not stirred in one scene he gave one hell of an amazing performance.there is a lot of nudity in this film and sex like usual soft-core films but its passable because your in for the story not for sensual scenes most of all it was about how Paul run that business & family and kept them all together despite they were falling apart Paul tries hard but what fate has in-store for him is definitely a worth looking story, Paul Raymond became also gets accused of running prostitution inside his club and Soho the sex entertainment district,this film is not about rise and fall Paul was on rise till his death in 2008.overall its a story of the king of sex as far as i see if your looking for a good story and great performances plus if you are a Steve Coogan fan then this is a must see for you i am also surprised that not many critics from Singapore and India have picked this up i am happy for that as critical reception kills it this film is purely for audience members i enjoyed it for what it was.My Rating For The Look Of Love 2013 Is 7/10 Highly Recommended Go See It.

kosmasp Another reviewer stated, that this is not as engaging as other Steve Coogan and Winterbottom collaborations. I won't comment on that, but try not to think in those categories if you can, because your movie viewing experience will suffer. You shouldn't compare previous works with the newer ones. In this case, Steve Coogan makes an otherwise not very likable character at least interesting. And that is sufficient enough to carry the movie through.At least in my book. Steve Coogan had obviously fun playing this character and it is showing on the screen. Of course there are some usual clichés you get thrown at you, but it's almost impossible making a movie of this size, that is at least a bit commercial, without stepping into them. If you don't mind too much, you will get an entertaining enough movie to pass the time.If the real "Paul Raymond" was half as charming as Steve Coogan in this, than you understand his charm. You also should be aware, that there is a lot of nudity (not really a big surprise considering the theme of the movie).

Matthew Stechel The Look of Love from Steve Coogan and director Michael Winterbottom was definitely something to look forward to--between the two of them they've cooked up 24 Hour Party People, Tristam Shandy, and The Trip--all three of which are top notch films in many ways. They're all moving and quite funny in addition to being very well done dramatic portrayals of guys begrudgingly reflecting back on the choices they've made in their life as well. This film has the latter part but nowhere near the good humor of the former part. Its possible the two men wanted to play the seriousness of Coogan's character's plight for straight dramatic value or maybe they felt that the character being portrayed wouldn't be as funny as the ones Coogan played in the other films, either way the movie itself mostly just lays there on screen. There's not much to engage you or pull you into the story this time around and Coogan's character who's supposed to be the central figure of this "character study" never begins to come across as a vivid, fully fleshed out person the way he does in the other films...i kept waiting for the details of his life to get filled in but the film mostly glosses over the details that would've made his character someone to root for (or against) Instead what we get is a barely there stick figure, you can sympathize with some of the things his character has to goes through towards the end, but you can never fully feel for his character.Coogan plays somewhat of a British Larry Flynt here...someone who becomes a wildly successful entrepreneur and real estate tycoon on the strength of a pornographic empire and his successful attempts to have frequent nudity and stripping in proper polite public society. Its said at the end of the movie that his character was the richest man in Britian in the mid 2000's,--tho the film itself is set during the late 70's/early 80's (Relying on the soundtrack to tell you when you are is what i did, as Donnovan's "Sunshine Superman" pops up towards the beginning, and Soft Cell's "Tainted Love" pops up in the last half hour, i got that we were moving from the 70's thru the 80's here but its honestly hard to tell because there are so many different period signifyers all kind of just thrown on screen.)The film's storyline involves Coogan's ever evolving relationship with his daughter whom he refuses to leave when he walks out on his wife and son, apparently he shares a significant bond with her, we're told that she's a lot like him character wise and you can see why that is as the story moves on. When she ends up being kicked out of boarding school, against his better instincts he ends up taking her on as a performer (she wants to be a singer) and eventually a full on partner in his various business dealings. The bulk of the story is essentially how the business he very successfully built for himself ends up destroying his own daughter little by little (you know it isn't very long before she ends up over-indulging in drugs and the lifestyle in general and getting in way over her head, etc, etc) Meanwhile Coogan keeps whatever difficult emotions he's feeling bottled up while witnessing the slow decline of his daughter, preferring to over-indulge in the nightlife himself.This could have all been a nicely effecting story about a guy who never took the time to share or process his feelings towards the other people in his life suddenly having to grapple with the choices he had made having such a significant effect on the one true loved on in his life. Unfortunately, again, none of it really comes across--i don't know if this is because Coogan's character steadfastly refuses to take responsibility for his actions, or because Winterbottom purposefully keeps Coogan's character at such a remote distance from the audience that again it ends up being difficult to feel for him when the difficulties in his life start up. You can see how much pride he takes in how he presents himself to everyone else, and how little else matters to him which may be the point, but it doesn't make it any easier to latch onto him as the main character in a movie. Unlike the other three films the star and director made together, the film's central character never comes across as an even remotely likable person so the attempt in the last half hour or so to make him more relatable to the audience never works because you were never really on his wavelength as a person/character to begin with.As a whole, the film is an interesting attempt at doing a whole seedy 70's esque character study, but it just doesn't quite work as a whole and while Coogan does get in a good handful of one liners--although those are so few and far between one another tho that they might as well have not even been there tho i was thankful while watching it that they were-- so while itself is never exactly a dead zone, the film overall is way too inert to really pull you into the world of its central character and that is sadly the complete opposite of what the other 3 films the star and director have done together.