Alicia I love this movie so much

Actuakers One of my all time favorites.

Beystiman It's fun, it's light, [but] it has a hard time when its tries to get heavy.

Kaelan Mccaffrey Like the great film, it's made with a great deal of visible affection both in front of and behind the camera.

JohnHowardReid Oscar Wilde would be hard put to recognize his off-spring in this updated film ver¬sion. Not only have his American tenants been replaced by billeted G.I.'s and his her¬oine's age lowered from fifteen to six, but the character of the ghost himself has under¬gone a remarkable transformation. No longer a bully who murdered his wife because "she was very plain, never had my ruffs properly starched, and knew nothing about cookery", he is a sadly penitent creature obviously modeled on Robert Donat's The Ghost Goes West for motivation and Bert Lahr's Cowardly Lion for character. At least his speech about death is still more or less intact: "Death must be so beautiful. To lie in the soft brown earth, with the grasses waving above one's head, and listen to silence. To have no yester¬day, and no tomorrow. To forget time, to for¬give life, to be at peace." Naturally, all the quips and satiric thrusts Wilde directed at Americans have been ruth¬lessly removed, e.g. "I come from a modern country, where we have everything that money can buy... I reckon if there were such a thing as a ghost in Europe, we'd have it at home in a very short time in one of our public museums, or on the road as a show." (This Wilde idea was actually used in The Ghost Goes West). MGM have fashioned Wilde's wit into a rather ponderous and hokey script. Nonethe¬less, it does offer some marvelously comic and wonderfully bizarre opportunities for Laughton who takes full advantage of every opening. Miss O'Brien proves a gifted assistant, but - with the exceptions of Reginald Owen and Una O'Connor - the rest of the players are somewhat hamstrung by forced and dated dialogue. No matter, as Charles Higham points out in his incisive study, "Charles Laughton: An Intimate Biography" (Doubleday, New York, 1976) Laughton is always most engaging. Whether "flying across rooms rattling his chains, screaming or groaning to frighten the G.I.'s, or, in a lyrical sequence, quietly speaking about his need for peace ... he makes the ghostly Canterville a touching and pleasantly grotesque figure of fun." Charles Higham also tells us that the film was started by director Norman Z. McLeod who relinquished his post in despair after seven days of shooting when he failed to win Laughton's confidence. Laughton helped the young Dassin with valuable suggestions in private, though taking pains never to argue with the director in front of the cast and crew.All told, Dassin's direction comes across as proficiently competent, though there is little to distinguish his input from that of the other minor MGM directors of this period - like Roy Rowland, say - except a couple of unusually long takes between Laughton and O'Brien, and a few shots stylishly framed by mullioned windows. Robert Planck's black-and-white photography tends to be grainy (to facilitate the special effects?), though some of the night interiors are very attractively lit (the television print is tinted green, or at least it was back in 1987. The current print aired by TCM has reverted to grainy black-and-white). Other credits are up to the mark.

TheLittleSongbird I can't say for sure how faithful The Canterville Ghost is to Oscar Wilde's story as it's been a while since I read it. What's for sure though is that I have always really liked this film. The story is slight and may get a little too schmaltzy at times, however much more than makes up for it. The costumes and sets are simply beautiful and lovingly photographed and directed, while the music is fitting with the film and story's mood. The script is on the whole delightful, piling it on with the fun and charm. And I can say little wrong about the performances either. Charles Laughton plays the title role with real gusto, and Margaret O'Brien is suitably cute as a button and exuberant. They are well supported by the amiable, charming Robert Young, the characterful Reginald Owen and the suave Peter Lawford. All in all, a lot of good fun. 8/10 Bethany Cox

Ed I don't blame the folks involved in this junk version of Oscar Wilde's beautiful, partly satirical, novella, "The Canterville Ghost". It was, after all, typical of the (well-deserved) propaganda films of WW2. But I too was a non-fan of Margaret O'Brien, especially when I was a child and the idea of revising the story to take place during WW2 turned me off. I admit she was in many better films than this one, even as a child star, and even though her line-reading was typical of the children on the present-day Disney channel. Oscar knew what he was doing, unlike the makers of this film.I also wonder why Charles Laughton who is still considered a major stage and film actor of his time got roped into this one but I suppose he considered it "fun". And, as usual for most actors, after a while they will seemingly do anything for a buck.I still cringe when I think about this film and the awful (supposedly naughty!) song about "Gertie from Bizertie" which was more acceptable, I suppose, than "Madamoiselle from Armentières".

PTullius00 I don't know that I will even give a movie a 10 out of 10, but this movie has "haunted" (in a wonderful way) my life since my childhood! Not only do the great actors of those days and the screen writing teach us what real life, courtesy, care, concern and speech are like, they can still flood our minds with hope! Not to say that good movies aren't still made, because they are! And not say that everyone was rosy and good then, either. But this movie still retains a way, and tugs on our minds and hearts, to still be good people, to not give in to the epithets of the present U.S. culture of 2007. It only takes honesty, care, understanding, concern and kindred souls to realize that we all are one on this planet, and may more planets than just this one. And actors such as Charles Laughton, Margaret O'Brien, Robert Young, Rags Ragland, Una O'Connor, Reginald Owen, and so many more, continue to teach us in ways that many of our present day actors will never be able to. And I'm not sure why!?! And isn't it interesting that 2 GIs can dance together, and do it wonderfully well, and it IS art!! And yet done today, people would look at all of that and make lurid judgments!! And a 7 year old could act with the likes of a Charles Laughton and we don't jump to all kinds of disreputable conclusions, at might happen today. I am thankful for movies and stories such as this. I am thankful for people such as Oscar Wilde, Edmin Blum and Jules Dassin. Unfortunately, the telling of the realities of war, though, although not as graphic then as now, (maybe that's not a bad thing), are still as haunting today as back then. But rather than end on a sad note, I say, let us all raise a glass to the hope that is part of the movies of such as the like as Charles Laughton, and to the hope that will continue in many ways in today's movies. I know they are there. I watch too many not to understand that. It's just that times were different. But people usually still fight for good and noble causes today as ever before, and isn't that what this movie is about?!!!