Greenes Please don't spend money on this.

ChanBot i must have seen a different film!!

Calum Hutton It's a good bad... and worth a popcorn matinée. While it's easy to lament what could have been...

Jakoba True to its essence, the characters remain on the same line and manage to entertain the viewer, each highlighting their own distinctive qualities or touches.

jacobjohntaylor1 The is a great movie. It is has a great story line. It also has great acting. It is better then Spider man 2 and Spider man 3. But it is not has good has The Amazing Spider man. But still this a very good movie.

shivpsn This film is just ok. It is better than the first film but thats as far as it goes. Electro was an extremely disappointing villain and the rhino doesnt appear until the last 10 minutes of the film. Gwen staceys death feels very rushed and it was not emotional at all. Apart from that it is a half decent film.

supersilvertoon Can we bring Tobey Maguire back please. I love Andrew Garfield and all but as Spiderman he lacks any real emotion as being the Spiderman character he is supposed to fill. Spiderman is a teenager still in high school and Garfield looks like a grown 25 year-old man. The motivation and reasoning for the blue electro "no-one-cares-about-him" villain portrayed by Jamie Fox is completely abysmally stupid. "Spiderman doesn't remember me from that one random time I said hi to him and even though I LOOK NOTHING LIKE I DID BEFORE he should remember me". Shut up. This villain character sucks and is forgettable in every way possible. I'm glad Gwen died in this movie honestly. It's a perfect representation of this catastrophe that was "The 'Amazing' Spider-Man" franchise. Was it enjoyable? not really as the SGI for Jamie's character made it look like he had an extra 20 chromosomes and was not believable whatsoever. Even at the age of 13 I didn't understand why electro dude hated Spider-Man so much. It made no sense. You ruined my favorite superhero and I will hate you forever for it. Waste of money and time, but it is the perfect example of what NOT to do in a movie. Thanks

Leofwine_draca This follow up to the Andrew Garfield-starring reboot of the SPIDER-MAN franchise is marginally better than its predecessor, but that really isn't saying much. This is another overblown, bloated, and unappealing mess of a movie, with a ridiculously overlong running time at two and a half hours. It just goes on and on and on, through the same old plot scenarios (the Green Goblin AGAIN?) and cheesy romance already witnessed in the Sam Raimi trilogy, and failing to add anything new whatsoever. Okay, so the CGI web-slinging scenes are better, but the film is still light and superficial and doesn't even try to connect on an emotional level. Garfield is stuck playing an immature character and the rest of the cast aren't much better. This film is at its best in the energetic opening and closing sequences, both starring a cameoing Paul Giamatti, and in the scenes involving Jamie Foxx's entertaining villain. The rest is merely mundane, and the 3D effects are completely uninspiring too.