Stevecorp
Don't listen to the negative reviews
Reptileenbu
Did you people see the same film I saw?
Intcatinfo
A Masterpiece!
bauhaus-80370
WTF 3.8 in Ratings for this great movie!?
I voted a 7 and i think its fair!
its a movie to enjoy with Friends or Family, i dont spoil anything but:
it got good Music too :-)
pilon-34719
My wife and I love this movie and have watched it many times. Good clean action the whole family can enjoy. This movie has a great story and characters that are easy to like and root for. I would love to see another movie or TV show of Pluto Nash. If you liked,Princess Bride,5th Element or StarDust you will enjoy this movie.
daworldismine
pluto nash is one of them movies, that was a box office flop, so people like to jump on the bandwagon and say its rubbish, when it is far from it, this is a great eddie murphy movie, and is funny, with a great cast, and a sexy looking rosario dawson, thats a pretty sweet hour and a half to me. most people that badmouthed the movie, didn't even watch it, its just cool to say it isn't good, well let me tell you know, if your a fan of eddie murphy, and why wouldn't you be, then you will enjoy this movie very much, no it isn't one of the best movies of alltime, it isn't even of eddie murphy's best but it is a great comedy, that delivers some good laughs, watch it you'll be surprised
oneguyrambling
The Adventures of Pluto Nash isn't the worst film ever made. It just might be the worst value for money though, with a reported budget topping 100M and a box-office of less than 5 it makes Jonah Hex look like a wise investment. But despite this it is more sad than bad.I can't possibly see where they thought the laughs were going to come from… I can't fathom which parts were supposed to be entertaining… Worst of all I can't really see where the money was spent…I just sincerely hope it wasn't Randy Quaid's salary.Pluto Nash was made by the same guy that made Tremors which is the inverse if Pluto Nash, a low budget / high entertainment affair that is remembered fondly by all that have seen it. Pluto Nash wants to be quirky, cool, edgy, funky and hip but is really none of these things.It is 2080 and the Moon has been made hospitable for humans. Pluto Nash (Eddie Murphy) is the guy who everyone on Earth's satellite adores – except the bad guys who want to force him to sell his bumpin' club to them.After a run in leaves his club a smouldering pile of rubble (like this film) Nash sets off with waitress Dana (Rosario Dawson – who obviously spent her paycheck on implants after filming ended) and his faithful robot Bruno (Randy Quaid).The trio traverse the moon trying to lay low out of the gunsights of the bad guys while working towards finding who is ultimately responsible for their situation. Along the way they encounter many recognisable faces that add nothing to the film, Jay Mohr, Peter Boyle, Pam Grier, John Cleese and Alec Baldwin among others.I think the aim was for Nash to be cool and likable, Dana the cute love interest and Bruno the comic relief. All fail. As does everything else in the film.But again Pluto Nash is as harmless as it is pointless, unlike the braincell shattering Tank Girl it made me want to sleep more than vomit – admittedly neither is an endorsement for the film – but the issue remains how could something cost so much look so ordinary?Now I know how the Miami Heat must feel.A big budget light comedy set on the moon and featuring its own fading star in Murphy was never going to be a big hit. This can't be the fault of director Ron Underwood but the big-wigs who greenlit it and opened the coffers. The absolute ceiling for this film was Demolition Man, itself decidedly average. The floor was Tank Girl, which Pluto managed to avoid but just barely.Now you tell me; is a ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLAR investment worth making for a film that at best could end up mediocre?Final Rating – 3.5 / 10. Pluto Nash sucks, but it is isn't the end of the world… unless you happened to be the one who covered the budget.
