SnoReptilePlenty Memorable, crazy movie

Sexyloutak Absolutely the worst movie.

Humaira Grant It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.

Mandeep Tyson The acting in this movie is really good.

Vincent Black I was flipping through Netflix when I saw the cover art of a man duel wielding auto pistols. I new from the artwork alone this movie had serious problems. Against the warnings of the Netflix, I proceeded to watch the movie.I don't need to really sit here and add what has been cited over and over about this film. To give you a rough idea on how badly the movie is written; one scene in the movie has Sinbad telling his tech that he plans to use the small 2 man sub. The tech explains the sub requires 2 people to operate it. So he takes Loa, a jungle warrior woman... obviously unskilled labor wasn't included in that conversation. During the scene inside the sub the actress playing Loa did her best to look confused or frightened, honestly I could not tell. The tech contacted the sub and told them that he was going to light up a button to press. Loa pushed that button. Great job! Meanwhile I am certain that the crab scene (already on You Tube) will become the next internet meme, second only to "I took an arrow in the knee." So I won't complain about this movie being junk or garbage since I went against all the warning flags and watched it anyway.

igost This movies is hilarious - I was laughing most of the time. It's really good in being bad - pretty much like Tarantino's spoofs of B-rated horror movies, only in adventure genre. And I'm quit sure it's a spoof, these people can't be serious. My favorite part was Sindbad about to go inside volcano for stones and Loa asks him "Do you need anything else?" He doesn't say a word, just reaches out and kisses her, so perfectly cheesy - it's unbelievable. There are zombies, long-lost father, rogue sailors, giant octopuses and even Somali pirates! And everything is done with serious faces and emotions worthy of Twilight Zone (and yes, special effects are just as cheap). Well done!

Mike Boyd I really think the voting system ought to allow negative scores, just to counter some of the positives given by people clearly connected with the film - either on the production side or acting side.I guess I'm referring to Mr. "joemorph from United States" who wrote a ridiculously long and praising review that was clearly aimed at him getting some of his investment back.Hard luck Mr. joemorph from USA. This film is appalling.Even worse than the film was the acting of the lead actor. Apart from the ridiculous "crab" scene where he had a little tantrum, his face rarely broke into a smile, a frown, or gave any other indication of what he was feeling other than a look that said "I don't believe I'm in such a pathetic film".

Elswet As far as Sinbad movies go, this is pretty wretched. It starts off weak, continues weakly throughout its contrived story, what story there is, and terminates climatically but flat. If this were Made-for-TV, perhaps I could be a bit more forgiving, but even with a tiny infinitesimal budget, it should have been far better than this.Competent talent could not have hurt, but unfortunately for the audience, no one tried that tack. Had they, perhaps invested a little love in the earlier stages, paid the least bit of attention to necessary elements such as wardrobe, staging, props, or details of any kind.The story is weak, the production style is M4TV, the acting (other than the two principals) is elementary at best, and the direction seems to be disorganized and lacking in intent. That might be the fault of the film editor instead of the director, but the direction itself does seem haphazard.All in all? I wish I'd read a book.It rates a 1.7/10 from...the Fiend :.