Tarzan and the She-Devil

1953
5.3| 1h15m| en
Details

The king of the jungle fights off ivory poachers.

Director

Producted By

Sol Lesser Productions

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

IslandGuru Who payed the critics
Cebalord Very best movie i ever watch
Smartorhypo Highly Overrated But Still Good
FirstWitch A movie that not only functions as a solid scarefest but a razor-sharp satire.
a_chinn Director Kurt Neumann directed the horror classic "The Fly" but the dull Tarzan material here is nowhere as good as that classic. Despite a rather provocative title, this film doesn't have any She-Devils who look the Tura Satana or anything close. Instead, all you get is a lot fo stock footage of animals, jungles, and a boring story about ivory hunters needing to be stopped by Tarzan. One of the ivory hunters is played by George Sanders' sound-alike brother Tom Conway, so that's a bit fun. Its' also funny because Conway earlier played a great white hunter who tricks Tarzan into helping him find hidden gold. You'd think Tarzan would have learned his lesson the first time! Raymond Burr plays the main baddie, so that's a good thing, but there's not much besides Burr and Conway to recommend about this one. Probably a low point all the Tarzan pictures, which was also the last time Lex Barker played the role.
Michael_Elliott Tarzan and the She-Devil (1953)** (out of 4) Lex Barker's fifth and final time playing Tarzan is a rather strange one. In the film, ivory poachers (Monique Van Vooren, Raymond Burr) are wanting Tarzan to help him but when he refuses they try a different method. Poor Tarzan thinks that Jane (Joyce McKenzie) has been burned to death so in his depressed state he doesn't fight off the poachers when they capture him. They plan on forcing him to help but what Tarzan doesn't know is that Jane's still alive. TARZAN AND THE SHE-DEVIL has been called the very worse Tarzan from a major studio outside the Bo Derek version but I think that's a tad bit harsh. There's no question that it appears Barker was bored with the material and there's no question that we get one stupid scene after another but at the same time there are still a few decent elements here. I think the best thing going for the film is the performance by Raymond Burr. Everyone will always remember him for playing Perry Mason but he was a terrific villain and if you're unfamiliar with his bad guy roles you'd be doing yourself a favor by checking them out. He does a terrific job here playing the cool, laid back jerk who will stop at nothing to get what he wants. Burr just has a certain snake-like quality about him and you can't help but see he's having a ball being as bad as he can. Van Vooren is also quite good as the leader of the poachers who isn't afraid to use a wink to get her way. McKenzie, the fifth person to play Jane in this five film series, isn't all that memorable but then again her screen time is very limited. Barker turns in his worse performance as the ape man as you can tell he's bored out of his mind and it's easy to see he's not too interested in anything that's going on. The story itself is a rather weak one and the ivory poachers thing had been done before and put to much better use. When it's all said and done, this is perhaps the worst of the Barker films but the supporting characters keep the film going. Without then I might have agreed that it's one of the worst films out there but the villains are good enough to where "B" movie fans might want to check this out (after they view the classic MGM Tarzan films of course).
tom_amity My fellow-reviewers have commented that the "She-Devil" in the title is a misnomer, and that the lady in question is far less of a "devil" than her two male flunkies--one of whom, wonderfully played by Raymond Burr, is easily the most frightening, hateful, detestable villain you'll ever encounter in any film, period. But emphasizing this point too much will entirely miss the point of the film.It is, after all, the "she-devil" who concocts the horrible idea of robbing Tarzan of his power by robbing him of his love. What man, however evil or intelligent, would ever be able to think of that? I refer you to the earlier and more celebrated film "Tarzan and His Mate": in the earlier film, a white hunter launches an evil plot against Tarzan's life, but that scheme is child's play in comparison with this one.As in "Tarzan and His Mate", the jungle man and defender of animals is opposed by callous ivory hunting white men. "Whenever I am close enough to the elephants - the finest ivory in the world - Poof! Tarzan, he calls them away!", says one of them. We hear no such useless whining from the boss lady. She knows what Tarzan lives for and she knows where to hit him. Consequently, she comes closer to destroying him than any of his other (usually male) enemies ever could. And she doesn't need to do the overt evil; she gets her male flunkies to do it for her. She knows that Tarzan is above all a man of love, and her scheme is simplicity itself: make him think his love Jane is dead, thus breaking his spirit. Then, as a climax, reveal to him that she's alive, and make a deal: call the elephants for us, and the two of you are free. Is that a she-devil or not? You bet!Tarzan, of course, outsmarts her; his famous quick mind returns in a flash when he sees Jane alive. "Tarzan call elephants", he says, doing such a good imitation of a broken man that the viewer is totally fooled along with the ivory hunters. Then he has an enclosure built (to attract the elephants into) and says to the native attendants, "Tarzan say when close gates." The native gives him a dirty look, as if to say, "Yeah, 'Tarzan say when close gates'! Cop-out!" Tarzan calls the elephants, and when they're stampeding toward the gates he yells out, "Close gates!" and the camp is stampeded. The ivory hunters are presumably killed as Tarzan rescues Jane and rides off with her on an obliging elephant. The ending is magnificently happy.The earlier "Tarzan and His Mate" is best seen in a double feature with "Tarzan and the She-Devil." The earlier film, a lyrical celebration of Tarzan's life with Jane, features a fellow named Holt, an old flame of Jane's. Holt has apparently killed the ape-man and made it look like an accident. Armed with this false report, he woos Jane into agreeing to accompanying him back to "civilization." (It goes without saying that Holt is an ivory hunter, and that his style is greatly cramped by Tarzan's presence.) As those who have seen the earlier film will recall, Jane's interest in Holt and in "civilization" disappear when she realizes that Tarzan is very much alive.Well, "Tarzan and the She-Devil" pursues a rather interesting and similar angle. Here, the plot against Tarzan is ten times more evil than anything Holt or any other man could have come up with in a million years. Women, as also men, can be good or not so good. But the female of the species bears the more watching.
Hermit C-2 Tarzan looks like a real hero of the '90's here, not only stopping illegal ivory poaching but upholding human rights by foiling some latter-day slave trading. This time it's one of those curiously light-skinned tribes that inhabit Central Africa in some of his movies.The film's title is something of a misnomer. The nominal she-devil here is Monique van Vooren, who sponsors the poachers, but she's a pussycat compared to Raymond Burr, full into his "heavy" role. This was the last time around as Tarzan for Lex Barker, no reason to shed any tears, though admittedly the character isn't one you can do a whole lot with. Joyce Mackenzie was the fourth actress in a row to give a single performance as Jane, and she does an OK job. There are some nice scenes of domestic bliss with the happy couple in this movie. All in all this is just another Tarzan flick, not so great, a little better than most. But you always knew what you were getting with these movies.