Linbeymusol Wonderful character development!

Dotsthavesp I wanted to but couldn't!

Odelecol Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.

Lidia Draper Great example of an old-fashioned, pure-at-heart escapist event movie that doesn't pretend to be anything that it's not and has boat loads of fun being its own ludicrous self.

Woodyanders Slimy C.J. (a sturdy portrayal by Nathan Day) and his wimpy reluctant partner Stan (solid Stacey T. Gillespie) are a couple of bumbling wannabe crooks who try to steal twenty pounds of weed from fearsome local pot farmer Bud (robustly played with lip-smacking wicked relish by Kevin Taylor). However, things go awry after Bud catches the inept pair in the act and forces the duo to do his evil bidding by abducting a trio of women over the course of three days.Writer/director Jacob Ennis cooks up a pleasing trashy good time complete with salty dialogue, a constant brisk pace, a sweet smidgen of tasty gratuitous female nudity, a blithely scuzzy atmosphere, colorful low-life redneck characters, a tight 77 minute running time, a pungent evocation of the downhome Kentucky backwoods environment, and startling moments of nasty violence and raw brutality. Scream queen Debbie Rochon acquits herself well in a nice supporting role as distraught mother Miss Brooks. Toshiyuki Hiraoka's twangy score hits the flavorsome spot. Fans of pure fetid celluloid filth should dig this one.

Shashank c First of all, story hasn't got anything new or special. badly directed movie, worst acting ever accompanied by ridiculous and funny music with stupid dialog delivery by the actors. this movie doesn't make any sense in whatever is happening in the movie. you need to be really foolish if you want to agree the way things are going on in this movie. the actors are acting like they are not ready to do some real acting or like they simply don't know how to act. it also looks funny to see how these actors react in different situations of panic as if they are so cool or are not very serious or depressed.Don't watch it. its a boring movie, a waste of time. even i watched this movie skipping a little bit in between the scenes. if u still watch it, you'll regret it. watch some other movie instead. believe me!

juzer I strongly recommend not to watch this film, unless one has a desire of learning what bad film's are all about. This is one film which I would recommend to the Students of Audio Visual studies, so that they learn what silly mistakes they should avoid in film making.The camera moments are jerky, the director seems to have gone on a vacation leaving instructions to the cameramen to film whatever seems suitable. And the eye movement of the actors will remind you the kind of films that appear under the category of amateur porn films made in eastern Europe.The lead lady, Karen Boles does seem to make a brave attempt in giving some semblance, but unfortunately the cameramen does not do justice to her. Suffice to say its one film she will regret having accepted. One really feels sorry for her. God save the art of film making from Jacob Ennis.The horror of the film is, in wasting our precious time watching it.

thejoo05 Let me first off by saying this was good idea for a horror flick, but this was just a difficult movie to watch, and to take seriously as an independent film. The acting was just poor and it looked like it was made by a group of friends who think they can act, with a cheap digital camera, and edited with iMovie. The dialogue seemed very forced, and that I can believe that even the actors were reading lines than acting their roles. Even all the physical contact just looked fake. And the fact that they show every detail just got annoying, if someone lost service, I get that by seeing a reaction and a line, I don't need to see the phone that shows it. I know that we all start somewhere, and I hope that these people keep trying, I just hope that they get better with time. If this was their first attempt I say they gave it a good shot.