ThiefHott Too much of everything

Megamind To all those who have watched it: I hope you enjoyed it as much as I do.

Lollivan It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.

Brenda The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

lth25 Overall this is a good film about a great horse, Ruffian. It presented a time capsule of the racing world in 1974-75. One theme was that racing needed a great horse to draw crowds and the tracks (the New York tracks particularly) were empty due to lack of interest. This isn't entirely true. Secretariat raced in 1972-73 and he was in the first running of the Marlboro Cup which attracted champion horses. And the Marlboro Cup which was a pre Breeders Cup race attracted huge crowds. The film implies that Ruffian got more people to the empty track. Not entirely true--she most likely attracted new fans but the fans packed the stands for the Big races like the Belmont Stakes and Marlboro Cup. Also, Foolish Pleasure is raised to War Admiral like quality in the run through to the match race. However, Foolish Pleasure was not THE standout three year old colt of 1975--it was actually Wajima who became Champion three year old colt of that year. Foolish Pleasure was a nice racehorse but nowhere near this superhorse the movie implied he was.Also, there was a painfully long sequence of the run on the backstretch where Ruffian broke down (run in slow motion showing the leg actually snapping in close up). I think perhaps just running the actual race would have been shown to better effect.Sam Shepard did an excellent job as Ruffian's trainer Frank Whitely. The actors playing the owners were given rather unsympathetic parts particularly when they pushed for the match race. The film also had an interesting angle of the viewpoint of the Newsday reporter who followed the career of the great filly.The sequences of the real Ruffian in the closing credits were refreshing to watch. More scenes of her races (not the simulated ones) would have been welcome.

pdopd I'm a full time trainer, horseman on the Mid-Atlantic circuit, in my off time I see five movies a week. Rarely am I treated to as an enthralling story about my first love as this.From the timing, and character development there's an honesty about Ruffian, her handlers and their story. The horses used were beautiful, the racing scenes surprisingly realistic, and the camera shots were magnificent. This one ranks slightly below my all time favorite Caseys Shadow and above Seabiscuit, with solid high paced interest toward the eventual tears. Quite a feat for TV. The strength of the movie was the writing, the directing and cast all displaying superior theatrics. Given the budget restraints for a TV movie, I accepted the difference in the substitution of era vans for trailers, and other difficult to substitute prop switches. There were many more strengths in the production than weaknesses.The ending is done well, with dignity, gently lifting the viewer into a better place,for all that had happened.I especially like the post log and what happened to the characters later in life. All in all, a wonderful two hours of entertainment.

sol (SOME SPOILERS) Very factual account of the sensational front running filly Ruffian who blazed across the sports pages and major east coast racetracks, Aqueduct Belmont Monmoth and Saratoga, running up a string of ten victories, setting or breaking track records while doing it. Ruffian ended her racing career by meeting a tragic end at the Belmont Race Track on July 6, 1975 in her long awaited match race with the Kentucky Derby winner and last years, 1974, two-year colt champion Foolish Pleasure when she broke a bone in her right front foreleg, as the two champion horses were battling it out on the backstretch just before the half mile pole.Starting her racing career in Belmont Park on May 22, 1974 in a 5 1/2 furlong maiden race Ruffian ,overlooked by the betters, went on to defeat a field of 2 year old fillies by an astounding 15 lengths. Running up a string of four victories Ruffian then went on to win the Spinaway Stakes at Saratoga by 13 lengths at the unbelievable time of 1:08 3/5. A feat that even the great Secretariat and Man O' War, breaking 1:09 at six furlongs as a two year old, couldn't do!It was in the fall of 1974 that the racing world began buzzing about a match race between the super filly Ruffian and champion two year old colt Foolish Pleasure with both horses undefeated in their respected, two year old Colt & Filly, divisions. This lead to Ruffian suffering a sprained ankle in her rigorous training schedule by her trainer Frank Whiteley, Sam Shepard, that sidelined her for the rest of the year. The injury caused Ruffian to miss a chance to face Foolish Pleasure at the mile two year old Champaign Stakes at Belmont Park, that Foolish Pleasure won, on October 5, 1974.1975 started out like gang busters with trainer Frank Whiteley getting his now three year old filly Ruffian into razor sharp condition as she stormed out of the starting gate and rolled over all the competition. Winning every race that she was entered in including the filly version of the Triple Crown, The Triple Tiara, that included the one mile Acron the 1 1/8 mile Mother Goose and the grueling 1 1/2 mile Coaching Club American Oaks setting stakes records in each. This set the stage for the big showdown at the Belmont Race Track the 1 1/4 mile match race that was to take place on July 6, 1975. Tragically it was to be the last time that the great Ruffian would ever step on a race track.Heart-wrenching movie that leaves you using up all your handkerchiefs as we see how Ruffian ran her heart out and ended up breaking down just as she was about to break away and take the lead from Foolish Pleasure in their match race. Ending up being put to sleep when she, with everything possible being done to save her life, not only re-fractured her right leg but broke her left as well as she came out of surgery and tried to stand on all fours which the poor filly, even with a brace on, couldn't do.The tragic death of Ruffian left Newsday sports reporter Bill Nack, Frank Whaley, who covered the great filly's career races so traumatized that he just couldn't bring himself to ever watch a horse race or write about horse-racing again. Great racing action, archived film as well as reenactments, makes "Ruffian" one of the best films about horse-racing ever made. The movie brought you back to those magical days in 1974-75 when Ruffian set record after record in burning her exploits across the sports pages that ended so tragically just over a year after she made her debut on the racing scene. What other athlete, human or animal, ever accomplished so much yet ended his or her career so suddenly. It's next to impossible to find any one in sports that can even remotely compare with her!Ruffian was buried in the park that she had some of her greatest victories as well as met her only defeat that also ended her life Belmont Park and was buried at the finish line where she was in 10 out of the 11 races that she raced ahead of any of the horses that she raced against. There's also a strange irony in not just Ruffian the great filly but "Ruffian" the movie that was broadcast on the ABC network on the evening of June 9, 2007! It's on that very day that another super filly "Rags to Riches" raced into the horse racing record books by winning the 1 and 1/2 mile Belmont Stakes becoming the first filly ever to win that race in 102 years! You can just see Ruffian having a track-side seat at the finish line, where she's been eternally entombed, smiling as "Rags to Riches" roared across the line beating the boys and doing what Ruffian set out to do, but sadly didn't, at that very same race track some 32 years ago.P.S As for "Rags to Riches" amazing Belmont Stakes victory Ruffian in winning the Grade I Coaching Club American Oaks, the very last race she was to win in her racing career, which was the exact same distance as the Belmont Stakes amazingly ran that race a full second, five lengths, faster then the Belmont Stakes winning Filly! How About That!

qatmom Movies hardly ever get horse racing right. Seabiscuit was the closest approach I have seen, but even that movie had problems. Ruffian is loaded with problems.WHY WHY WHY do movies with racing invariably confabulate odd little human subplots that anyone with any knowledge of the sport knows are pure hokum? I do KNOW the sport, having raised, handled, and raced my own horses, and having written about the sport professionally. The actual history of Ruffian was compelling enough without the make-believe elements of this movie.The horses used to portray the title character were some of the coarsest, plainest beasts imaginable. Ruffian--the real one--was a tall, nearly 17 hand filly, quite leggy and graceful. With all the cast-off TBs available for purchase on a per-pound meat price basis, couldn't at least one been found for close shots that did not look like a chunky pony??? I am sure that many people in racing would have cheerfully advised the movie's makers on details, gratis, just to be sure things were not gotten laughably wrong. The notion that Claiborne Farm, in the 1970s, shipped horses in a rusty beige trailer with "CF" on the side is silly. Claiborne was and is one of the last remaining family, multi-generational outfits, and has been involved not just with foaling and raising good horses, but in shaping and influencing the breed globally. It is not a marginal operation without presence or reputation. Go to the farm, and note that the gates, the (very large) water tower, the trim on the main stallion barn--are all painted Cadmium Yellow, the farm colors. Rusty beige trailers? Pulled by aged pickup trucks? I think not.This was a FICTIONAL movie appropriating the name of a real filly, and beyond that, not much more. It was never really explained why Ruffian was extraordinary--the movie makers seemed confused between stakes record time and track record time--or that she had an average winning margin of 7 lengths after 10 races, or that there has never been anything like her since, and in what seems a glaring omission, there was no hint of all the advances in caring for catastrophic breakdowns since 1975. Foolish Pleasure's reputation was inflated beyond what it was at the time--he was a good 3-y-o, but not a great one, and he finished his days in obscurity, pasture-breeding mares somewhere out west.No wonder Frank Whiteley and Jacinto Vasquez sought to legally block the airing of this movie without adequate disclaimers.