Spidersecu Don't Believe the Hype

Merolliv I really wanted to like this movie. I feel terribly cynical trashing it, and that's why I'm giving it a middling 5. Actually, I'm giving it a 5 because there were some superb performances.

Siflutter It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.

Married Baby Just intense enough to provide a much-needed diversion, just lightweight enough to make you forget about it soon after it’s over. It’s not exactly “good,” per se, but it does what it sets out to do in terms of putting us on edge, which makes it … successful?

zardoz-13 The last film on Peter Lawford's contract at Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, director Allan Davis' "Rogue's March" amounts to a lightweight rehash of Zoltan Korda's classic "The Four Feathers" (1939) with John Clements. Despite an end credits thanks to India for allowing MGM to lense scenes in the Khyber Pass, most of this black & white epic was shot at the studio and at Vasquez Rocks in Southern California. Only the grain on the film betrays the fact that footage from the Errol Flynn adventure film "Kim" (1950) was used. A stellar cast, including Richard Greene, Janice Rule, Leo G. Carroll, Michael Pate, Sean McClory, Hayden Rorke, John Lupton, and Sidney Lawford, surround Peter Lawford. Mind you, it is routine from fade in to fadeout, but this 84-minute escapade depicts the court-martial of Captain Dion Lenbridge (Peter Lawford of "Sergeants 3") just as the Royal Midlands Fusiliers has been ordered to leave for action on the Afghan-Indian border. The military convict Lenbridge of selling secrets to the Russians, strip him of his rank, boot him out of the army, and prepare to try him in civil court. Lenbridge gives his minders the slip and re-enlists in another regiment. All of this comes at a particularly distressful time because Lenbridge had proposed marriage to Jane Wensley (Janice Rule of "Alvarez Kelly"). Although it qualifies as a potboiler, "Rogue's March" is a tolerably entertaining endeavor with a crisp Peter Lawford performance. Too bad it wasn't shot in color to take advantage of all those beautiful British uniforms.

esmondj This is our old friend the Bengal Lancers movie. Hero in disgrace, redeems himself by saving the honour of the regiment. Unlike most of the genre (The Charge of the Light Brigade, The Four Feathers, etc) this one is actually set in India or nearby for the most part. Peter Lawford is too weak for the lead; Richard Greene slightly too fruity, as always, for the second banana; and I don't know how Janice Rule got a gig as the English girlfriend, although she wears her best corset and a stunning Victorian ballgown trimmed with flowers at the bodice. Overall it's a fun example of the genre, and the battle scenes at the end, shot in the real Khyber Pass somehow, are alone worth the price of admission, giving you some idea of strategy & tactics, not just the usual hand to hand biffing.

SanteeFats Made in 1953 when Hollywood ruled. This film has some aspects of the movie Four Feathers. There is the wronged soldier (Peter Lawford) dismissed from the service, sentenced to civilian custody where he some how escapes. What I thought was a nice twist was when Lawford enlists in another outfit. He ends up serving in India where his original unit is there and in trouble. He distinguishes himself and with the capture of a Russian scum sucking agent is cleared of the original charges and while it is not actually shown I assume returned to his former station in the military. I really liked the scenes with the mules carrying the mountain artillery and when the gun crews start setting it up. That is not shown very often especially in older movies where they are more interested in the main characters and the action scenes. I also really liked seeing Leo G. Carroll as the commander of the units involved, he usually got supporting roles of a lesser tier than in this film or as a comedic element in a movie.

frankfob ---SPOILER---In this period picture set in the Indian "raj" in the mid-1800s, Peter Lawford is a British army officer framed for espionage by Russian spies and drummed out of the army. He escapes from the police on his way to prison and makes his way to India to gather evidence to clear himself, a task he figures to accomplish by enlisting in the army under a different name. A variation on the old "Four Feathers" story, this low-budgeter from MGM can't make up its mind whether it's a thriller (Lawford trying to clear his name and find the real spies) or an action picture (the British fighting rebellious Afghan tribesmen in the Khyber Pass) and doesn't really succeed at either--you know that Lawford's going to clear himself (he does) and that the British army will win the day (they do). There's some odd casting (Janice Rule is Lawford's British sweetheart but doesn't even try to hide her American accent, Australian actor Michael Pate plays a Cockney soldier with a laughably exaggerated Cockney accent, American actor Richard Hale--who often played Indian chiefs in westerns--plays a Russian spymaster in the same kind of chopped, singsong manner in which he played Indians), and the picture overall is stiff and mechanical; a burst of action at the end isn't particularly well done (although it was filmed on location at the Khyber Pass and uses hundreds of extras), and even Lawford's charm, good looks and way with a line can't really save it.It's a bit better than most of the innumerable period "action" clunkers Sam Katzman was churning out at Columbia--several of them with the same setting as this picture--at around the same time, but that's about all that can be said for it.