Ride the High Country

1962 "Showdown in the High Sierra!"
7.4| 1h34m| NR| en
Details

An ex-lawman is hired to transport gold from a mining community through dangerous territory. But what he doesn't realize is that his partner and old friend is plotting to double-cross him.

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

Alicia I love this movie so much
GamerTab That was an excellent one.
Deanna There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.
Marva It is an exhilarating, distressing, funny and profound film, with one of the more memorable film scores in years,
Michael O'Keefe This is an overlooked classic Western that helps cement director Sam Peckinpah's career. Down and out, strapped for cash, two former lawmen Steve Judd (Joel McCrea) and Gil Westrum (Randolph Scott) are hired by a bank to deliver a huge amount of gold from a mining camp in the high Sierras down to the bank. More or less swan songs for McCrea and Scott as their long lasting careers wane. To be exact, this is the final effort of Scott. The two old friends wrestle with ethics as one wants to take the proceeds and run, while the other intends to finish the assignment agreed to. The action scenes are full of realism and the two stars turn in memorable performances. The sweeping vistas are terrific.Rounding out the cast: Mariette Hartley, R.G. Armstrong, Ron Starr, James Drury, L.Q. Jones and Warren Oates.
PimpinAinttEasy I watched Ride the High Country on Blu-ray yesterday and rated it a 7 on IMDb. I wasn't bored. The sub plot with the antics of the silly girl causing all the problems was quite interesting. And disturbing too. Paint Your Wagon, The Trap (the Oliver Reed film) and Mccabe and Mrs.Miller were some of the other films which shed light on this unique problem of frontier America where there were more men than women. I loved the scenery. But then most Westerns do have amazing scenery. The shoot outs were nothing to write home about. I am willing to concede that many of the biblical references went over my head because I have not read the bible. The background score was over the top (especially in the scene where the girl's father hits her). Joel Mcrea and Ron Starr were annoying. I didn't hate it. In fact I quite enjoyed it. But I don't know why people rate it so highly. I also thought the film's beginning with the people waiting for the horse racers and Mcrea thinking they were waiting for him was quite slap-sticky.
MisterWhiplash At one point about two-thirds of the way into Ride the High Country, Elsa practically spells out the point of the movie: we're taught by our elders that there's good and evil, black and white, but the world isn't that simple (Joel McCrea responds that it should be simpler but it isn't). This is a magnificent Western for its story and character, but also for something more: in the same year that John Ford made The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, another twist in the screws of the genre that the director helped to innovate, Peckinpah made a movie that was both deeply footed in the past (the actors Scott and McCrea were veterans in the industry and had acted together many times, often in sort of stock genre films that have likely not aged well) while also looking ahead to the future. What happens when you don't always have such sharply defined lines between good and evil? What happens if the person you think you trust has a crappy family or lives in a town that's not exactly savory, or on the flipside the person you don't quite trust wins it back, somehow? What happens if there's a double-cross? The world's much more complicated, despite such trusty and classically styled old-timers like the ones here.It's a film with its focus on two things but they merge together very well: Scott and McCrea are old friends who team up, along with a young hot-shot to go to a small town and bring back some gold and profits (nowhere near what McCrea's Judd expected - more like $20,000 instead of $200,000, such is the way of life sometimes post-1849), and along the way they on their trek they go to a farm tended by a not-comically-but-still-extremely religious man named Knudsen and his daughter Elsa. This is where the emotional component sort of kicks in; she isn't allowed by her strict father to talk to men he sees unfit, which means basically anyone, even as she intends to marry a young man named Billy Hammond who has stopped by a few times.Against his wishes she leaves and tags along with the other men. Ron Starr plays the young cowboy, his first name is Heck, and they take a liking to each other until he takes things too far one night in an almost-rapey sort of way. When she gets to the small mining town - complete with whorehouse, of course - and meets again with the man she intends to marry, she doesn't seem to understand his brothers are part of the package (this includes future Peckinpah regulars like Warren Oates in a wildly funny performance and LQ Jones). And then there's the wedding night.The plot involving the gold isn't unimportant here, and to be sure a major reveal upends things for the audience, but like in many other films that the director made (and extremely well), he is more fascinated by behavior, how the brothers interact with one another as human cretins, like in being filthy and unkempt and, well, unable to keep it in their pants around a woman like Elsa especially when the booze kicks in. This is a movie where a wedding scene includes perhaps the greatest wedding speech by the officiator I've ever seen (try and find it online, it's actually thoughtful and philosophical and you'll want it for your wedding), and then in the next beat a whirlwind of Elsa being taken this way and that by Billy's drunken louts. What is she to make of all of this? Could she have dealt with this had she grown up in that town and not been so sheltered? What are the gray areas in this world? Peckinpah gets a good contrast with the movie's questions of morals whether it's with a young man and a young woman who may be in love (and the young man in question, Starr as the sort of weak link in the cast though he's not bad as this would-be-f***-up of a love interest), or with these two grizzled men who have lived full lives and gone through many ordeals together and separate. The director really loves just watching these two guys on horses talking about how things used to be but how things also are now, and yet makes the drama that comes up between them feel real. At the same time the script brings up a lot of moments of clever dialog - Scott delivers it a little more dryly than McCrea, but this works - so that you're having a good time more often than not... then when a dramatic revelation happens, or we see the outcome of this disastrous wedding Elsa takes part in, it makes a more sizable impact.Themes of loyalty, trust, honor, respect to women, and what it means to face people with guns head on get explored here in an entertaining and exciting and funny script, and here we see this filmmaker take shape with the first, shall one say, "true" Peckinpah film. Though certainly not bloody like future films - it's still for MGM before the code broke down, and it's almost surprising how much is shown of the prostitutes in the film - it's got plenty of tremendous gun-fights, and the ending has bad-ass written in ballsy gunsmoke. It's among the director's finest, and it gives a lot to do for McCrea (who I like her as much as I do in Sullivan's Travels) and Scott, who dig in to a script with a lot of potential and take it to another level. Its a soulful film about what it means to be IN this place and time and what lines are drawn for good men, not so good men, and judges who get drunk after performing wedding ceremonies.
gavin6942 An ex-union soldier is hired to transport gold from a mining community through dangerous territory. But what he doesn't realize is that his partner and old friend is plotting to double-cross him.The movie was released on the bottom half of a double bill. William Goldman says he spoke to an MGM executive at the time who says the film had tested strongly but they felt the film "didn't cost enough to be that good". Funny looking back now and thinking that Peckinpah or Joel McCrea could ever find themselves working in a B-movie. But it is apparently true.And stranger still, despite the growing praise over the last several decades, the film allegedly lost money when it debuted. Was this because of the billing, or were people truly not interested?