Moustroll
Good movie but grossly overrated
Odelecol
Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.
karlito31
but not far from it either. Can rise some mild interest, but every now and than it also blow it by some stupid, not needed scene ( one where two main characters fight with swarm of flying bots is really beyond comprehension, both technically and logic wise), copycat cliché usage and , as someone already mentioned, worst "should be post-apoc" sets I have ever seen in any movie. Nevertheless, I watched it to the end. Main actor did rather solid job, despite some criticism here. It looks refreshingly underplayed as opposed to regular overplay standard for this type and level of movies. Some of effects are decent (???), and story itself is not that horrible. All in all, not the worst movie(just in last few weeks I saw at least two much worse, one of them being Living hell), but not too far either.
Johnny Kay
Seriously. What the hell was that? I'd give it minus 10 if I could. Awful scenario, awful acting, awful effects, awful choreography... there was absolutely nothing in this movie that can make you feel anything but a complete loss of time. I'd never write a comment like this, just because I respect people's effort to create something, but this is by far the worst movie I've seen... By the way, most of it is shot in Sofia, Bulgaria, in a place called "Business Park Sofia", and is what I see everyday when I look out the window. Well, that was the only thrilling thing for me in this movie, but it won't be for you, so PLEASE don't waste your time :) Oh. There's one reason to watch it - "what shouldn't your movie/acting look like". I apologize to the crew that worked on this movie but it's a shame to charge people money that they have worked for to see this. It really is. I bet you didn't spend more than a 500 000$ on this movie. And who made the 3D... guess what? IT'S AWFUL! My little brother make better 3d than you, and he's a high school student.
charlesdias
This movie has all characteristics to be one of the mos awful movies of the year. It's a mix of superficial story with poor dramatization, far than poor sets and cheap CGI (computer generated images).I choose to watch it because the poster I saw on a website but I needed just three minutes to realize it was a waste of time I just accepted to go on with because it was a lazy rainy Sunday night.I'm really curious to know why people design, work on and put on the market such crap movies like this one. I barely believe it's minimum profitable. Perhaps it's a way to get some business tax reduction by "supporting culture financing movies production"./ Anyway, just think about watching it in a lazy rainy Sunday with no other good movie aveible for watching.
skylerh
This has got to be one of the most disappointing films of recent memory. And I just got finished watching License to Wed. The basic notion is intriguing enough: people live in a dystopic future but the "Man" keeps it hidden from them using computer chips implanted in their brains. Our hero is a stand-up, police-officer kind of guy who, for fairly unclear reasons, decides to join a rag-tag group of rebels (by group I mean one or two) dedicated to showing the world the truth. But this didn't even rise to the level of a Sci-Fi channel original movie, but was slightly better than that one zombie movie made by those kids in their trailer park one weekend... and Transmorphers. The acting was as good as could be expected, given the wooden dialogue, bad direction and snails-pace editing. No, that's not true. The acting was also pretty bad. The music sounded like something out of a mid-80's video game. This was more like someone's proof of concept of a movie than the actual movie itself. If I had a chip implanted in my brain I'd program it to make myself remember doing something slightly enjoyable for the last hour and a half of my life. Avoid at all costs.
