Hellen I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

TrueJoshNight Truly Dreadful Film

Unlimitedia Sick Product of a Sick System

Stellead Don't listen to the Hype. It's awful

AAChaoshand Wow, simply Wow. This movie is also craptastic. I gave it a 4 because of a great scene where a mercenary chick has sex but thats bout it. This movie is about a guy that gets killed by a little girl by means of a flesh eating virus in a research plant, or so it seems since they don't actually tell you. Anyway she grow up and becomes a security guard there and these random mercenaries show up for the virus since it sells for a lot. They raid the place and take over while Mr. hell comes out of a oozing can of slime. He kills people and takes their eyes to stay alive and in the end that stack of eyes is destroyed and so is he. The only good part is when the blonde mercenary gets naked and has sex then puts on her red thong. Bad acting, bad props, bad funding, bad idea, wasteful crap.

Defiance Boy I resisted about 20minutes in front of the screen, but it wasn't the flick nor the murders...it was the horror acting of those people cause i can't refer to them as actors.I've seen school plays better directed with better acting and why not with even more credibility from the actors than this one, I mean pleeease not even the swearing is believable, so yes i give it a 1 for awful. If he is Mr. Hell than his name probably comes from the acting cause he killed every single line of script and every single frame of film the director wasted on one of the worst movies ever. If you wanna see a better movie with a killer that plucks the eyes of from his victims you should go to see "See no evil" cause even though the "bad childhood" cliché was overdone, you don't get up from your chair screaming in horror cause of the awful non-existing acting

otherworldconspiracy The cover for this movie was amazing. The movie that the case contained, though, was not. It was a completely different story. It turns out that this is a B movie. Have you ever seen Goosebumps? If so, then I'll tell you now that those graphics, when it comes to things such as melting people, are slightly better than the ones in this movie. The storyline is okay, but it could've been better. I won't spoil that for you, though. In some parts of the movie, absolutely nothing makes sense. Two characters will do something just for the heck of it. What am I talking about? I'll tell you. *SPOILER* In the middle of the movie, two characters, for absolutely no reason, right out of the blue, strip down in broad daylight, right in front of Mr. Hell, mind you, and start having sex. It was a scene that had nothing to do with the movie. Right after they're done, they start fighting Mr. Hell using martial arts.*END OF SPOILER* Strange. But the graphics, events, actors, and stupidity of some of the characters itself makes this movie worth it. It seems that some of the characters have absolutely no mind of their own. I give it a 5/10 just because of the humor.

fangomatic Acting in this movie is amateur (makes one wonder what motivated the choice of genre), representing typical, nonetheless exasperating, mix of inadequate feelings (consequently, behavior) and involuntary pauses between lines being filled with either blank or bewildered facial expressions.Arguably, the plot isn't much worse than that of the "exclusive horror" movie majority, meaning it's plain, predictable and thus, boring (when not silly).Dialogues complete "Mr. Hell" as a cinematographic disaster, being fragmentary, extremely uninformative and unnatural. Moreover, sadly, the writers chose to uphold the flawed tradition of covering up the lack of scariness with would-be humor, would-be irony and would-be sarcasm, manifested in shabby, overly repetitive "cliché - change of context - touché" form.The only thing that counts positive is solid B-class photography.