Life Itself

2014 "The only thing Roger loved more than movies"
7.8| 2h1m| R| en
Details

The surprising and entertaining life of renowned film critic and social commentator Roger Ebert (1942-2013): his early days as a freewheeling bachelor and Pulitzer Prize winner, his famously contentious partnership with Gene Siskel, his life-altering marriage, and his brave and transcendent battle with cancer.

Director

Producted By

Film Rites

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Also starring Chaz Ebert

Reviews

Pacionsbo Absolutely Fantastic
FuzzyTagz If the ambition is to provide two hours of instantly forgettable, popcorn-munching escapism, it succeeds.
Allison Davies The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.
Fleur Actress is magnificent and exudes a hypnotic screen presence in this affecting drama.
clifflutz Life itself is a Documentary film about the life and career Roger Ebert a host on the very popular show Siskel and Ebert and a Pulitzer Prize-winning film critic. For about a day I debated whether I should write a review of this film at all. I had never watched the Siskel and Ebert show, never even read a word of Roger Ebert's countless film reviews. I was an outsider and felt that in a way my opinion was unimportant, but then I reflected back on the way that Roger democratized film criticism at the Conference on World Affairs with his Cinema Interrupts series, and I was sufficiently emboldened. The film starts with a clip of Roger speaking about the advancement of civilization and the importance of empathy. When he mentions film he makes it clear that the most important thing a movie can do is put you in the shoes of someone else and give you that experience in a way no other media can. After watching Life Itself I am struck by just how perfectly Director Steve James and Roger Ebert accomplish this. I went from being someone who knew nothing of Roger to feeling as though we could have been friends. This film made me do more than laugh and cry it drove me to take up writing movie reviews again! Roger had his own newspaper column at 15 years old when he was still delivering that same paper! My friends and I were newspaper boys for a short while in high school and none of us were bright enough to have written for the advertisement and coupon holder of a paper we delivered! As much of a hit to the ego as this all was I couldn't help but be inspired by the ability Ebert displayed. This was a young man who at one point literally stopped the presses! We are taken through time in a mostly linear fashion during the movie aside from the occasional interviews with Roger in the hospital. The film starts by giving us an idea of Roger's childhood and the relationship he had with his parents through questions posed in the interview, quotes from his memoir, and photographs from his youth. The Documentary skillfully continues to weave together interviews with friends, family, and excerpts from Rogers's reviews, along with many photos and video clips. Director Steve James pulls all these fragments together giving us a clear impression of Roger's life. Some of the most memorable clips were of the behind the scenes bickering between Gene Siskel and Roger on the Siskel and Ebert show. The two of them would do anything to knock the other off his game and always had a snarky remark for when the other messed up a take! Over time though they started to gain respect for each other and even grew close when doing the later seasons of the show. As the feature comes to a close we are introduced to more of Rogers health struggles and hear more from his wife and family. There are many touching exchanges that are initiated by Roger who has seemingly come to terms with his mortality and wishes to put things in order. Emails between Roger and Steve the director become more labored and eventually stop. When Roger posts his final blog entry you feel as if you've lost an old friend. Documentary films offer us something other movies can not. We are given a window into the lives of people rather than characters, life rather than cleverly or clumsily written stories. I have developed a deep adoration for a man who only a few days ago I knew barely a thing about. Life Itself is a beautiful walk in someone else's shoes.
Clifton Johnson At this film's outset, Ebert talks about movies being "machines for empathy," and this film was just that. It moved me, to tears and to laughter. James managed to capture the beauty of a well lived, even with only a couple months to work. There were so many little moments that were beautiful, and I think that's true for all of us.
Eddie Cantillo Life Itself(2014) Starring:Roger Ebert,Chaz Ebert,Martin Scorsese,and A.O Scott Directed By:Steve James Review A long time I go while I was watching a requested review by filmmasteradam on the movie Daredevil. He started the review by talking about what Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert said in a video that has been shown to journalism students and while I was watching that part I was like I really like these film critics and from there I've been watching videos on Roger Ebert from Nostalgia Critic,Chris Stuckman and some times reading his reviews or watching them on movies I haven't seen yet and I still do. But when Roger passed I found myself at dismay if he's gone who am I suppose to listen to when it comes to watching movies or just wanting to see an opinion on another critic,Chris Stuckman is still just a young man who I'm pretty sure doesn't have a picture under Rotten Tomatoes along with JeremyJahns and Filmmasteradam takes forever uploading a movie review because he's busy with college.That was until I noticed that my father or mother put a subscription for Entertainment Weekly and every now and then read the reviews from either critics Chris Nashawaty or Owen Gilberman along with two other critics who are associated with Roger Matt Zoller Seltz and Richard Roper. Even though I don't agree with Roper too often. The movie is of course a documentary,which is hard for any person to watch because you have to be either fond and familiar to the subject matter. But I was fond and familiar with Roger Ebert and I'm watching this documentation on him thinking that the best thing I can give about any documentary is that it is informative and enjoyable which this is.When you would watch any of Roger's friends or coworkers talk about I honestly felt that like I think i know what it is there feeling about how his work was and the things he did or his relationships with his family. I think that is the highlight of this film. I didn't take this film for an emotional tour of a critic who I enjoyed and you shouldn't either unless you've watched a good amount of his shows of Siskel&Ebert or Ebert and Roper,but if you haven't then take the film/documentation tour for the same reason I did,a tour into a mans life who loved movies just as much as you should if you are on this site/group and when the film is finished always remember one thing that I like to say for every time I ask a question,make a statement or leave a link to a review of a film that I enjoyed, always remember that no matter how bad films can be that there is an art to them for their badness and for the others their goodness remember to enjoy the movies! I give Life Itself a two thumps up and a five out of five.
Hitchcoc I wish I had half the insights and historical perspectives this wonderful critic and man had. I aspire to write about films but as a dilettante. There are moments of pure joy in one's life. Places where for a few moments we are transported from our mundane existences. When Siskel and Ebert were waxing profound, I forgot about what ailed me. The hard part was that it was only a half hour, but the good thing was that it was only a half hour. This documentary which set out to show a masterful man who was not perfect. He was arrogant at times and inflexible. But who could ask for anything more. This film is a film about love in the face of the barbarity of cancer. It is a glimpse into the working life of a newspaper man. My only criticism is that it would have been nice to see a bit more of the non-Siskel part of the man's professional life. But we are limited to a couple hours, and, of course, there are limitations. This is also about how we face death. As I get older, I wonder if someday soon a doctor will tell me what I don't want to hear. We should not go gentle into that good night. Ebert did not. But he knew when the body that he was given could no longer weather the storms of cancer. I miss both of these men.