Exoticalot People are voting emotionally.

Rio Hayward All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

Taha Avalos The best films of this genre always show a path and provide a takeaway for being a better person.

Geraldine The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

gemandeye1 Just another routine possession movie. Noting really groundbreaking. Was really wanting a good supernatural movie. This wasn't it. It killed some time though. And every so often a good possession movie does come out and surprise us. Nothing will ever top the Exorcist IMO but I have enjoyed several including recent ones like Deliver Us from Evil, The Devil Inside. The Exorcism of Emily Rose, A Haunting in Connecticut, amongst others including older classics This just doesn't come close to any of them. Yu can pass by this one unless like me you want to kill time watching am OK possession film. Just don't expect much.

toymatinee Watching this film, I was constantly struck by the way the director inserted himself into the project with such a loud thud.Playing camera and light tricks that seem designed only to showboat his technique, what is really revealed is an object lesson in the old phrase "Knowing just enough to get oneself in trouble." I can only hope that with the passage of time, the director/writer/editor/Svengali behind this wet splat comes to be humiliated by how amateurish he once was as he's grown into creating valid works.Plotwise, NO new ground is covered here. Not a centimeter of fresh ideas, but a fairly sizable contribution to teen-boy gratification fantasies wherein pretty girls say the c-word and a bleach blonde gives generously to the public nipple fund and the heroine is ...naturally, a virgin. Completely gratuitous gazongas (In the shower, of course!) is a sign someone has lost focus. This film doesn't ever seem to have bothered so much as looking for its reading glasses.To get performances this poor on film requires determination in casting, extraordinary bad-luck or a George Lucas level micro-managerial determination to suck any kind of reality out of the otherwise human-shaped beings verbalizing and mugging on the beleaguered screen. Add to that a series of times where you can literally speak the dialogue before the characters do, and you have a morbid product to foist upon people who could have otherwise put that hour and a half of their fleeting lives into anything and found it more worthwhile.The question of why it was made has been tossed out in a few reviews and while it seems like a bit of a mystery, I don't think it is at all. The answer lies in the opening of this review. It was a vanity piece created by a would-be auteur without talent or technique enough to assemble a film worth watching. I just hope he's able to grow using this film as experience. Another film this bad and Ewe Boll is going to be hiring hit people to come after this guy for working his stretch of sidewalk.Best recommendation is for 12 year-old boys who've never heard of horror films before. THAT would be a happy group. Anyone else is going to find themselves checking their phones during most of this digital face-palm.

adi_2002 After a night at the club Alex along with her friend goes to a fortune teller and here the news aren't so good. Soon she begins to be sleepwalking, feels and heard weird sounds around her, on her body appears all sort of bruises and has visions. She is documenting on-line about demonic possessions when she is convinced that something is inside her. Nobody believes her and the only escape is the father of her teacher at school because he passed with this kind of event.Although is seems like the movie is a imitation of the classic back in '73 it isn't. First in "The Devil in Me" aka "Devil Seed" the person who is possessed is a student girl and not a little girl. In this the signs appeared after she went to a witch, in "The Exorcist" Regan did not go anywhere. Here the girl is not bounded with ties by the bed. The priest makes only one visit at the girl while in the other movie the priest makes more visits and the comparison could continue so let's enjoy the film on how it is and let the similitude in peace.

Dejan VasiljeviÄ Oh well, here is the review... The movie itself is acceptable. It is not bad... ...that much. I have the impression that the director wanted to copy the movie The Exorcism of Emily Rose, as I noted elements of that movie in this movie. I have nothing much to say about this film other than just deja vu. Nothing special. Not to sound harsh, but I lost time watching this movie. I really do not recommend others to watch this movie because there is nothing to see. At the beginning of the movie, I was expecting some terrible/scary scene at the end of it. I thought for the beginning of this movie to be just an introductory story into much more horrifying scenes. But none of this. The actors are bad. Too bad. I rated movie with a good 3, because the film does not deserve a higher rating... ...Too bad.