Glucedee It's hard to see any effort in the film. There's no comedy to speak of, no real drama and, worst of all.

Tayloriona Although I seem to have had higher expectations than I thought, the movie is super entertaining.

Hayden Kane There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

Billy Ollie Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable

Sean Payne First off let me say this is NOT a Film for CHILDREN in NO way shape or form. This is Violence form the Get co This has very Inappropriate subject mater for any one under 16 and even then one should speak to there child. This film will make you think long and hard about events of our time past present, and about how sick some people are. I was on the edge of my seat the whole time it is a real tar tearjerker this was a insightful film well written and though out and Historically accurate it is a thought provoking film and one all mature minds will be talking about for some time, I would give this Ten out of Ten stars But I will say it again NOT a film for CHILDREN under Sixteen.

barnesyard This film was terrible in every aspect. The acting, filming, sound, character drama - all bad.The idea was captivating - I kept hoping it would get better...but it didn't.Someone could make a good version of this movie and it would be decent...it would probably be tainted by the stink of this movie.I believe this was supposed to be some kind of drama - there was nothing dramatic about it though. Lots of long slow pans over scenery were used. Why would someone go to all the trouble of making this movie, and then after watching it say, "I still want other people to suffer through this."

normrinks What are these horror fans out there thinking? Especially in in way down under? Guys, this ain't a horror flick, alright? It's an art film, a personal journey. I know some people who - like me - really enjoyed this film, but it's made for an intellectual art house crowd, not for horror fans. I guess the big mistake the producers made was to market this as a horror film, that way they got the wrong people viewing it. I've seen those things happen over and over again, especially from Lionsgate in the U.S., they go ahead and create a gigantic horror campaign only to disappoint and anger horror fans, why they keep doing this is beyond me. Anyway, I really liked this movie, I found it inspiring and engrossing and different and very, very personal. And I think Ken Foree did one hell of a job! This is his best role and his best performance ever. And it is Lommel's best film in many years, so stop beating up on this film and check it out again, alright?

justaskdan OK let's review key elements of which at least one or more are required in order to make a movie interesting, viewable, likable, thought provoking and perhaps even stunning or beautiful. This movie had bad writing (really bad), bad acting, bad casting, bad directing, bad cinematography, a bad plot and yes, even a bad score. In other words this film has absolutely no redeeming qualities about it whatsoever. I don't know how a project could fail so horribly in the year 2010 especially with such interesting and relevant material to deal with.The 2003 made for TV movie entitled DC Sniper: 23 days of Fear, was excellent by the way! I guess they couldn't even come up with an original name for this turd.I could tell that it was going to be a B movie with just the credits but many B budget movies I have watched and enjoyed. This was not one of them. Things that really bothered me were: [1] Two real bad characterizations of the 'Texan' and the initial FBI agent who in the end took the sole credit for catching the duo. [2] This was supposedly based on fact yet the script deviated away from the facts at every opportunity. [3] How the dynamic duo teamed up and during routinesurveillance while undercover they just happened to find them in a parking lot. I love the writing around this point where it becomes so cheesy that it is actual humorous. "That 50,000 dollar reward sure would go along ways in finding my daughter". As if cops get cash rewards for doing their jobs. [4] The dinner scene was so laughable. How could anyone write so poorly.[5] They couldn't afford a real gun I guess as the one they used was sooooo bad and everyone knows they were using a high tech semiautomatic rifle.[6] The position of the kid in the trunk trying to shoot was so unrealistic that yet again I liked it because it was so humorous. No one could hit anything like that.[7] Making a big deal of getting out and replacing the tail light after every shoot (which never happened by the way) and yet they forget to put it back on when they were caught napping in the parking lot.I could go on easily but I won't. The movie was so bad that it forced me to register with IMDb to vent.