Invaderbank The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.

Hadrina The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful

Kaydan Christian A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.

Isbel A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.

Blazehgehg This is a tragically dumb movie. I don't mean that it's a tragedy that it's so dumb, I mean this is a movie about people who don't have a thought in their head engaging in tragic situations. Much blood is spilled, but largely by people who lack any sort of basic reasoning skills or a shred of common sense. Occasionally the movie jabs you with its elbow, as if to say "Isn't this wacky and fun?" But there's no fun here, no whimsy, and very little camp or schlock. It's like beating yourself in the head with a rock for 104 minutes. I couldn't laugh with it, I couldn't laugh at it, I only rolled my eyes at how grotesquely nonsensical it was getting.The rubbery special effects are as cheap looking as they are rarely shown. The writing has that slightly "off" quality about it that makes you wonder if it was written in a foreign language and then translated in to English (poorly). Regardless of whether the movie is trying to be wacky, scary, or horrific, there is never any kind of suspension of disbelief. Even when the craziest things are happening, all of the characters have a weirdly disconnected "Eh, just roll with it." blasé mentality about everything. It's like a space alien's idea of what human beings act like.Don't even consider it; there's nothing redeemable to be had here.

oprlvr33 THIS is a sequel to the first two...???? Since when?I more than agree with the prior reviews here. This is an utter train wreck. What began promising quickly escalates into pure and utter nonsense. What the devil (no pun) were Clavell and Dudelson thinking? Apparently zilch. There is absolutely zero plot, mediocre acting (at best), and no script. It is merely a "chain" of nonsensical hooker story action that goes nowhere... fast. At least with the first two, action and lines flowed decently - connecting Romero's origination. This fiasco makes a mockery of that with its own pathetic 'twist'Stay with the real horror film rubes. This is not close to crap.

MistyNoble1987 I wish I could have given this movie a rating of less then one star. But alas, I cannot. This is the biggest abomination for a Creepshow I have ever had the displeasure of gazing my eyes and ears upon. I am extremely happy and relieved that I knew this was an unofficial sequel to the cult classic Anthology before I watched the thing. I may have cried a little bit if Romero and King had been involved with this mockery of a Flopshow! It makes me sick to think they can take a cult classic name, such as Creepshow, and drop it on what is this monstrosity known as Creepshow 3. The only thing I can even remotely say I liked about it is the fact that in one way or another, all five stories got tied together. However, that still does not erase the below mediocre acting, the effects were okay, but they certainly could have been loads better. This is one anthology I wish I had never found out had an unofficial squeal. The worst part about the whole shenanigans is I bought the three Creepshows as Italian Imports. But, alas, I was to naive to realize there is a possibility that if it is an import that it may not play on an American player. So I curled up with my blanket and put 3 in to my American DVD player only find out it was not compatible with my player. So I rushed out and spent $10 on an American copy without even exploring the possibility that I may be able to watch it on my computer. Fiddled with it last night, got it on the computer, now I have two copies of a movie that I won't even consider using for a coaster. Pathetic to say the least!

SteveResin The original Creepshow, way back in the early 80s, was a masterful film full of horror, gore, humour & general all-round fun. It featured some talented, big name actors like Ted Danson, Lesley Nielsen, Adrian Barbeau, Ed Harris & E. G. Marshall. The film was directed by the master himself, George Romero and written by none other than Stephen King. It did a wonderful job of bringing horror comic books to life and has become a cult classic. The second installment was a ropier affair, it seemed rushed and under-budgeted yet still included a few good stories and some quality actors like Dorothy Lamour & George Kennedy. Suddenly and almost out of the blue came the much anticipated Creepshow III and everything, and I mean everything that made the first two films watchable are missing. The stories are uninspired and dull, the humour is asinine, the direction is so poor it's a wonder to behold and the actors are people you haven't seen before and don't particularly wish to see again. The fact that most of them who took leading roles haven't worked in film since says a lot about the 'quality' on offer here. Even the music is loathsome, the producers deciding to avoid any kind of horror score and instead going for the most awful third rate 'jazz' muzak you can imagine. It hurts the ears just making it through this wreck. I rated it a 3 star affair for the car crash factor alone, it's so bad you really can't pull yourself away from it. Ultimately though you won't ever want to see it again.